Literature DB >> 27018510

Emerging Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Jacob Budny1, Joseph Fox2, Michael Rauh2, Marc Fineberg2.   

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed and researched orthopedic procedures. As technology and comparative research have advanced, surgical practices have changed to achieve a superior outcome. Our group performed a survey of orthopedic surgeons to evaluate current practice trends and techniques as a follow-up to similar surveys performed in 1999 and 2006. In a survey between 2013 and 2014 consisting of 35 questions regarding the surgical technique, graft choice, fixation method, and perioperative care in ACL reconstruction was sent electronically to the members of the American Orthopaedic Society of Sports Medicine and the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Responses were recorded and compared with previous results. Survey responses were received from 824 active surgeons. Of the respondents, 89.4% are subspecialty trained, 98% of which in sports medicine. Preoperatively, full-knee extension was the only "very significant" factor in surgical timing. Approach preference via an arthroscopic-assisted single-incision approach predominated (89%)-similar to earlier results. Bone-patellar-tendon-bone use decreased relative to hamstring allograft at 45 and 41%, respectively. Tibial tunnel placement shifted anteriorly and femoral tunnel placement shifted posterosuperiorly as compared with the results obtained 5 years ago. Femoral drilling through a low medial portal was preferred in 47% of responses, increased from 15%. Preferred fixation on both the tibial and femoral sides was either metal or bioabsorbable interference screws. The use of transfixation pins and other devices decreased. Postoperative rehab protocols did not significantly change, 68.7% preferred full-weight bearing, 55% using a range of motion knee brace locked in extension, 66.4% starting physical therapy 1 week postoperatively, with unrestricted activity at 6 to 9 months. Overall, an increasing trend toward using hamstring autograft and drilling the femoral tunnel through an accessory portal in primary ACL reconstruction was observed. This may reflect recent literature supporting more anatomic reconstruction of the ACL. Considerations including deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis, brace use, timing of surgery, weight-bearing restrictions, physical therapy, graft choice in athletes, and return to activity remained largely unchanged. Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27018510     DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1579788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Knee Surg        ISSN: 1538-8506            Impact factor:   2.757


  29 in total

Review 1.  What Factors Influence the Biomechanical Properties of Allograft Tissue for ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Drew A Lansdown; Andrew J Riff; Molly Meadows; Adam B Yanke; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Anatomic Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Improves Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Combined with Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Hua Zhang; Man Qiu; Aiguo Zhou; Jian Zhang; Dianming Jiang
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Adjustable buttons for ACL graft cortical fixation partially fail with cyclic loading and unloading.

Authors:  J Glasbrenner; C Domnick; M J Raschke; T Willinghöfer; C Kittl; P Michel; D Wähnert; Mirco Herbort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Rehabilitation Predictors of Clinical Outcome Following Revision ACL Reconstruction in the MARS Cohort.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Biomechanics of hamstring tendon, quadriceps tendon, and bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Darren Hart; Tanner Gurney-Dunlop; Jeff Leiter; Robert Longstaffe; Ahmed Shawky Eid; Sheila McRae; Peter MacDonald
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 6.  Osteoarthritis and ACL Reconstruction-Myths and Risks.

Authors:  Edward C Cheung; Marcus DiLallo; Brian T Feeley; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2020-02

7.  Preferences in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and return to sport: A survey among surgeons in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Baris B Koc; Martijn G M Schotanus; Edwin J P Jansen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-02-10

8.  [Short-term effectiveness of arthroscopic single bundle four-strand reconstruction using autologous semitendinosus tendon and anterior half of peroneus longus tendon for posterior cruciate ligament injuries].

Authors:  Xiao Wang; Xu Han; Xiaotao Shi; Yanhao Yuan; Hongnue Tan
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-05-15

9.  Accelerated Versus Non-accelerated Rehabilitation After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.

Authors:  Sang-Gyun Kim; Dae Hee Lee; Jae Gyoon Kim; Won Seok Kim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Tripled semitendinosus with single harvesting is as effective but less invasive compared to standard gracilis-semitendinosus harvesting.

Authors:  Luca Drocco; Daniele Camazzola; Riccardo Ferracini; Sebastien Lustig; Laura Ravera; Eugenio Graziano; Alessandro Massè; Alessandro Bistolfi
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2018-04-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.