Heather A Feldner1, Alyssa LaForme Fiss2, Lynn M Jeffries3, Sarah Westcott McCoy1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. School of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Dallas, TX, USA. 3. Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: On Track Developmental Monitoring System (DMS) is a novel series of tools to assist in shared-decision making, guide rehabilitation intervention based on functional ability levels, and promote episodic care service models. Further understanding of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of On Track DMS in clinical settings is critical. The purpose of this study was to understand clinician perspectives of the acceptability of On Track DMS and to identify potential implementation barriers and facilitators within pediatric physical therapist practice. METHODS: Three, day-long training workshops were conducted with 32 pediatric physical therapists across the US. Focus groups with 21 workshop participants were conducted following training. Results were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded into themes. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (1) Valuing the On Track Approach to Intervention; (2) Setting-Specific Needs and Challenges to Implementation; and (3) Training Material/Tool Strengths and Limitations. CONCLUSIONS: On Track DMS appears to have initial value and acceptability for pediatric physical therapists across practice settings. Perceived benefits include facilitation of data-driven practice and therapist/family collaboration to improve health outcomes for children with CP. Using this data to understand and assess barriers and facilitators to knowledge use are first steps in successfully implementing On Track DMS.
AIMS: On Track Developmental Monitoring System (DMS) is a novel series of tools to assist in shared-decision making, guide rehabilitation intervention based on functional ability levels, and promote episodic care service models. Further understanding of the acceptability, feasibility, and appropriateness of On Track DMS in clinical settings is critical. The purpose of this study was to understand clinician perspectives of the acceptability of On Track DMS and to identify potential implementation barriers and facilitators within pediatric physical therapist practice. METHODS: Three, day-long training workshops were conducted with 32 pediatric physical therapists across the US. Focus groups with 21 workshop participants were conducted following training. Results were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded into themes. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the data: (1) Valuing the On Track Approach to Intervention; (2) Setting-Specific Needs and Challenges to Implementation; and (3) Training Material/Tool Strengths and Limitations. CONCLUSIONS: On Track DMS appears to have initial value and acceptability for pediatric physical therapists across practice settings. Perceived benefits include facilitation of data-driven practice and therapist/family collaboration to improve health outcomes for children with CP. Using this data to understand and assess barriers and facilitators to knowledge use are first steps in successfully implementing On Track DMS.
Authors: Ian D Graham; Jo Logan; Margaret B Harrison; Sharon E Straus; Jacqueline Tetroe; Wenda Caswell; Nicole Robinson Journal: J Contin Educ Health Prof Date: 2006 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Dianne J Russell; Lisa M Rivard; Stephen D Walter; Peter L Rosenbaum; Lori Roxborough; Dianne Cameron; Johanna Darrah; Doreen J Bartlett; Steven E Hanna; Lisa M Avery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-11-23 Impact factor: 7.327