| Literature DB >> 35360860 |
Brent W Bever1, Zachary P Dietz1, Jennifer A Sullins1, Ariana M Montoya1, Ulfar Bergthorsson2, Vaishali Katju2, Suzanne Estes1.
Abstract
We provide a partial test of the mitonuclear sex hypothesis with the first controlled study of how male frequencies and rates of outcrossing evolve in response to mitonuclear mismatch by allowing replicate lineages of C. elegans nematodes containing either mitochondrial or nuclear mutations of electron transport chain (ETC) genes to evolve under three sexual systems: facultatively outcrossing (wildtype), obligately selfing, and obligately outcrossing. Among facultatively outcrossing lines, we found evolution of increased male frequency in at least one replicate line of all four ETC mutant backgrounds tested-nuclear isp-1, mitochondrial cox-1 and ctb-1, and an isp-1 IV; ctb-1M mitonuclear double mutant-and confirmed for a single line set (cox-1) that increased male frequency also resulted in successful outcrossing. We previously found the same result for lines evolved from another nuclear ETC mutant, gas-1. For several lines in the current experiment, however, male frequency declined to wildtype levels (near 0%) in later generations. Male frequency did not change in lines evolved from a wildtype control strain. Additional phenotypic assays of lines evolved from the mitochondrial cox-1 mutant indicated that evolution of high male frequency was accompanied by evolution of increased male sperm size and mating success with tester females, but that it did not translate into increased mating success with coevolved hermaphrodites. Rather, hermaphrodites' self-crossed reproductive fitness increased, consistent with sexually antagonistic coevolution. In accordance with evolutionary theory, males and sexual outcrossing may be most beneficial to populations evolving from a state of low ancestral fitness (gas-1, as previously reported) and less beneficial or deleterious to those evolving from a state of higher ancestral fitness (cox-1). In support of this idea, the obligately outcrossing fog-2 V; cox-1 M lines exhibited no fitness evolution compared to their ancestor, while facultatively outcrossing lines showed slight upward evolution of fitness, and all but one of the obligately selfing xol-1 X; cox-1 M lines evolved substantially increased fitness-even beyond wildtype levels. This work provides a foundation to directly test the effect of reproductive mode on the evolutionary dynamics of mitonuclear genomes, as well as whether compensatory mutations (nuclear or mitochondrial) can rescue populations from mitochondrial dysfunction.Entities:
Keywords: adaptation; compensatory evolution; electron transport chain; mating behavior; mitochondria; selfing; sexual conflict; sperm size
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360860 PMCID: PMC8961728 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.742272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.599
Strains, affected ETC proteins, and mating system. Apart from the gas-1 and the isp-1 V; ctb-1 M double mutants, we utilized strains containing each of four ETC mutations (two mtDNA-encoded, and two nDNA encoded) on three genetic backgrounds affecting mating system: wildtype (facultatively outcrossing), xol-1 (obligately selfing), and fog-2 (obligately outcrossing). Because results from a facultatively outcrossing gas-1 mutant (gray highlight) was previously reported in Wernick et al. (2019), it was not included in the current study. For logistical reasons, we also only studied a facultatively outcrossing version of the mitochondrial-nuclear double mutant, isp-1 V; ctb-1 M. Following standard C. elegans genetic nomenclature for such double mutants, the nuclear gene name is shown first alongside the chromosome number, followed by the mitochondrial gene name and “M” to denote the mitochondrial chromosome.
| Strain | Mitochondrial ETC Location | Mating System |
|---|---|---|
| N2 | wildtype | Facultatively outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex IV (mtDNA) | Facultatively outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex IV (mtDNA) | Obligately selfing |
|
| ETC complex IV (mtDNA) | Obligately outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex III (mtDNA) | Facultatively outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex III (mtDNA) | Obligately selfing |
|
| ETC complex III (mtDNA) | Obligately outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex III (nDNA) | Facultatively outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex III (nDNA) | Obligately selfing |
|
| ETC complex III (nDNA) | Obligately outcrossing |
|
|
|
|
|
| ETC complex I (nDNA) | Obligately selfing |
|
| ETC complex I (nDNA) | Obligately outcrossing |
|
| ETC complex III (nDNA) and complex III (mtDNA) | Facultatively outcrossing |
FIGURE 1Average male frequency of RC line sets (8 lines each) generated from ETC mutant/mating system combinations across 60 generations. (A) Average male frequency of RC line sets generated from wildtype N2 and ETC mutants on otherwise wildtype (facultatively outcrossing) genetic backgrounds. The orange line represents evolution of male frequency in the cox-1 RC line set. Note that male frequency of gas-1 lines were reported in Wernick et al. (2019) and that this strain was not re-evolved here. (B) Average male frequency of RC line sets generated from ETC mutants on xol-1 (obligately selfing) genetic backgrounds. (C) Average male frequency of RC line sets generated from ETC mutants on fog-2 (obligately outcrossing) genetic backgrounds. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Some lines at 0 and 50% are not visible.
FIGURE 2Average male frequency across 80 generations for the eight independently-evolved cox-1 RC lines. The dashed line represents RC line B1; the dotted line represents RC line B3.
FIGURE 3Relative fitnesses. (A) Fitness of G0 ancestral mutant strains relative to self-crossed wildtype N2; arranged by increasing mean relative fitness. Asterisks denote statistically significant differences between G0 ancestral mutants and N2. (B) Fitness of RC line groups relative to their appropriate G0 ancestor. n = 8 lines per group except cox-1 RC outcrossed where line B3 was removed owing to an absence of males. Note the change in y-axis scales. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
FIGURE 4Fitness of self-fertilized cox-1 G60 and G87 RC lines relative to their G0 ancestral mutant strain. Error bars = 1 S.E.M. The best-fit line of the data using standard least squares regression where y is G87 fitness and x is G60 fitness: y = 0.7472(x) + 0.0362 (F 1, 8 = 5.78, p = 0.053, nonsignificant intercept); R 2 = 0.490.
Direction of trait evolution in G60 cox-1 RC lines compared to their G0 mutant ancestor. The fitness of the facultatively outcrossing cox-1 RC lines was assayed by self-crossing (s) and outcrossing (o) relative to the selfed or outcrossed G0 ancestor, respectively.
|
| Outcrossing rate | Male sperm number | Male sperm size | Male mating success with coevolved | Male mating success with tester | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| + | |||||
|
| + s | |||||
|
| = o | − | = | + | − | + |
|
| = | − | − | − | − | − |