| Literature DB >> 35360429 |
Yu Yue1, Qiaochu Gao1, Minwei Zhao2, Dou Li1, Hua Tian2.
Abstract
Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is effective for severe osteoarthritis and other related diseases. Accurate prosthesis prediction is a crucial factor for improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction after TKA. Current studies mainly focus on conventional manual template measurements, which are inconvenient and inefficient.Entities:
Keywords: deep learning; error correct output coding; prosthesis prediction; total knee arthroplasty; transfer learning
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360429 PMCID: PMC8963922 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.798761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Figure 1Research procedure.
Figure 2The distribution of prosthetic size by gender.
Automatic codewords selection procedure.
| Target: a set of codewords S |
Figure 3Hard decision with Hamming distance.
Figure 4Soft decision with Euclidean distance.
Figure 5The distribution of prosthetic size with different genders.
t-test value.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral | 13.65 | 14.36 | 7.943 |
| Tibial | 14.24 | 14.77 | 8.331 |
Correlation coefficient.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral | 0.6151 | 0.6345 | 0.4134 |
| Tibial | 0.6314 | 0.6452 | 0.4300 |
Figure 6Fine-grained ResNet18 with multimodal data.
Figure 7The ratio of positive samples for each binary classifier. (A) Hadamard Code for Femoral Component Prediction; (B) Hadamard Code for Tibial Component Prediction; (C) Hamming Code for Femoral Component Prediction; (D) Hamming Code for Tibial Component Prediction.
Figure 8Accuracy of each binary classifier.
Figure 9Accuracies in different decision rules.
Accuracy metrics for different cases.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Baseline model | 70.59 | 68.72 |
| Optimized baseline model | 84.31 | 84.31 |
| ECOC-based model |
|
|
The bold values are best performances of proposed models.