| Literature DB >> 35360201 |
Qipeng Song1,2, Mengzi Sun2,3, Kelsey Lewis2, Jung Hun Choi4, Brad Manor5,6,7, Li Li2.
Abstract
Introduction: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) affects up to 20% of the population over the age of 60. Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) may assess PN adaptation by measuring the function of the peripheral neural system and central nervous system (CNS) modulation. This project aimed to find a reliable muscle among triceps surae muscles during standing and walking among the PN population. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: H-reflex; central nervous modulation; peripheral nerve; peripheral nervous system diseases; postural balance; postural control
Year: 2022 PMID: 35360201 PMCID: PMC8963420 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.800698
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.750
FIGURE 1EMG and stimulation locations. Surface electromyography (EMG) electrodes were placed on the muscle belly of soleus (SOL), the medial (MG), and lateral gastrocnemius (LG), and a disposable electrodes cathode was placed on the skin at popliteal fossa.
FIGURE 2Exemplar H-reflex recruitment curse during standing.
FIGURE 3Flowchart of the customized stimulation control during walking using LabVIEW and footswitch. The connection from the footswitch to the LabVIEW board, and from the LabVIEW board to the stimulator were tethered. Heel strike information was detected though footswitch and collected through a customized LabVIEW program at 1,000 Hz. Stride length was calculated from 10 (11) consecutive strides (foot strikes).
FIGURE 4Exemplar H-reflex recordings with standing condition. The onsets of the M- and H-waves were identified based on a single recording. There was a short period of stabled signal in after the stimulation artifact and before the onset of the M-wave. A much more extended period of the stable signal was observed between the end of the M-wave and the beginning of the H-wave.
FIGURE 5Exemplar H-reflex recordings with walking condition. (A) Walking H-reflex in 10 steps. (B) Average of the 10 steps.
Test-retest reliability of H-index (cm2/s2), includes the mean, standard deviation (SD), standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the H-index.
| Standing | Heel Contact | Midstance | Toe off | ||||||
| Test | Re-test | Test | Re-test | Test | Re-test | Test | Re-test | ||
| Soleus | Mean | 64.2 | 60.3 | 63.4 | 59.6 | 56.3 | 59.5 | 59.3 | 61.5 |
| SD | 19.9 | 8.9 | 10.3 | 8.8 | 6.7 | 7.7 | 13.2 | 11.8 | |
| SEM | 5.74 | 2.57 | 2.99 | 2.55 | 1.94 | 2.22 | 3.81 | 3.41 | |
| ICC | 0.507 | 0.486 |
|
| |||||
| 95%CI | –0.065∼0.828 | –0.091∼0.819 |
|
| |||||
| Medial gastrocnemius | Mean | 61.4 | 60.4 | 60.1 | 62.0 | 61.8 | 63.2 | 64.2 | 67.4 |
| SD | 14.26 | 15.47 | 10.00 | 11.04 | 10.11 | 9.13 | 13.88 | 9.56 | |
| SEM | 4.1 | 4.47 | 2.89 | 3.19 | 2.92 | 2.63 | 4.01 | 2.76 | |
| ICC | 0.221 | 0.223 |
|
| |||||
| 95%CI | –0.378∼0.690 | –0.396∼0.713 |
|
| |||||
| Lateral gastrocnemius | Mean | 63.3 | 64.9 | 65.4 | 62.1 | 65.4 | 61.5 | 63.4 | 61.6 |
| SD | 10.18 | 10.50 | 12.47 | 10.27 | 12.47 | 11.13 | 10.36 | 9.92 | |
| SEM | 2.94 | 3.03 | 3.60 | 2.97 | 3.60 | 3.21 | 2.99 | 2.86 | |
| ICC |
|
|
|
| |||||
| 95%CI | |||||||||
Bolded ICC and 95% CI indicate moderate or high reliability.
Test-retest reliability of H/M ratio, includes the mean, standard deviation (SD), standard error of measurement (SEM), intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the H/M ratio.
| Standing | Heel Contact | Midstance | Toe off | ||||||
| Test | Re-est | Test | Re-test | Test | Re-test | Test | Re-test | ||
| Soleus | Mean | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 0.249 | 0.341 |
|
| 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.18 | 0.43 | |
| SEM | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.12 | |
| ICC |
|
| 0.396 | 0.263 | |||||
| 95%CI |
|
| – | –0.402∼0.747 | |||||
| Medial gastrocnemius | Mean | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.10 |
|
| 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.08 | |
| SEM | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 | |
| ICC | 0.220 |
|
| 0.582 | |||||
| 95%CI | –0.379∼0.689 |
|
| 0.010∼0.867 | |||||
| Lateral gastrocnemius | Mean | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.12 |
|
| 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.14 | |
| SEM | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | |
| ICC |
|
|
|
| |||||
| 95%CI | |||||||||
Bolded ICC and 95% CI indicate high reliability. M-waves used in calculating both H/M ratio during standing and walking were the maximum M-waves for each collection during standing. The H/M ration calculations used maximum H-wave during standing, but H-wave magnitudes during walking were from the stimulation intensive as 15% of that needed for maximum M-wave during standing.