OBJECTIVE: In patients presenting with painful, burning feet with minimal signs of neuropathy, the following questions were addressed: 1) How many of these patients have a peripheral neuropathy? 2) What is the role of skin biopsy in establishing a diagnosis of neuropathy? 3) What conditions are associated with the neuropathy? and 4) What laboratory studies are useful in this patient population? METHODS: A total of 117 consecutive patients referred for evaluation were prospectively studied. All underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS) and a battery of blood tests, including antinerve antibodies. If NCS were normal, a punch biopsy of the skin of the distal leg was performed to ascertain the intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density. In a subset of 32 patients, the sensitivity of skin biopsy was compared to quantitative sudomotor axon test (QSART) and quantitative sensory tests (QST). RESULTS: Three groups emerged. Group 1, with abnormal NCS (n = 60, 34 F/26 M, mean age 60 +/- 14 years), represented 51% of the cohort. The majority had neuropathies of undetermined cause, but 18 (30%) had associated conditions. Group 2, with normal NCS and reduced IENF density (n = 44, 29 F/15 M, mean age 57 +/- 14 years), represented 38% of the cohort. Three in this group had associated conditions. Group 3, with normal NCS and IENF density (n = 13, 6 F/7 M, mean age 53 +/- 13 years), represented 11% of the cohort; most had no diagnoses but two had MS. In a comparative subset analysis, skin biopsy was more sensitive than QSART or QST in diagnosing a neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients presenting with painful feet are heterogeneous, consisting of both large and small fiber sensory neuropathies. In rare cases, a central cause for pain can be found. Over one-third of patients required a skin biopsy to diagnose a small fiber sensory neuropathy. A limited battery of blood tests facilitated diagnosis, but serum antinerve antibodies were not helpful.
OBJECTIVE: In patients presenting with painful, burning feet with minimal signs of neuropathy, the following questions were addressed: 1) How many of these patients have a peripheral neuropathy? 2) What is the role of skin biopsy in establishing a diagnosis of neuropathy? 3) What conditions are associated with the neuropathy? and 4) What laboratory studies are useful in this patient population? METHODS: A total of 117 consecutive patients referred for evaluation were prospectively studied. All underwent nerve conduction studies (NCS) and a battery of blood tests, including antinerve antibodies. If NCS were normal, a punch biopsy of the skin of the distal leg was performed to ascertain the intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density. In a subset of 32 patients, the sensitivity of skin biopsy was compared to quantitative sudomotor axon test (QSART) and quantitative sensory tests (QST). RESULTS: Three groups emerged. Group 1, with abnormal NCS (n = 60, 34 F/26 M, mean age 60 +/- 14 years), represented 51% of the cohort. The majority had neuropathies of undetermined cause, but 18 (30%) had associated conditions. Group 2, with normal NCS and reduced IENF density (n = 44, 29 F/15 M, mean age 57 +/- 14 years), represented 38% of the cohort. Three in this group had associated conditions. Group 3, with normal NCS and IENF density (n = 13, 6 F/7 M, mean age 53 +/- 13 years), represented 11% of the cohort; most had no diagnoses but two had MS. In a comparative subset analysis, skin biopsy was more sensitive than QSART or QST in diagnosing a neuropathy. CONCLUSIONS:Patients presenting with painful feet are heterogeneous, consisting of both large and small fiber sensory neuropathies. In rare cases, a central cause for pain can be found. Over one-third of patients required a skin biopsy to diagnose a small fiber sensory neuropathy. A limited battery of blood tests facilitated diagnosis, but serum antinerve antibodies were not helpful.
Authors: Amanda Peltier; A Gordon Smith; James W Russell; Kiran Sheikh; Billie Bixby; James Howard; Jonathan Goldstein; Yanna Song; Lily Wang; Eva L Feldman; J Robinson Singleton Journal: Muscle Nerve Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.217
Authors: D M Cain; P W Wacnik; M Turner; G Wendelschafer-Crabb; W R Kennedy; G L Wilcox; D A Simone Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2001-12-01 Impact factor: 6.167