Literature DB >> 35359396

Case Report: Niraparib-Related Pulmonary Embolism During the Treatment of BRCA Mutant Advanced Ovarian Cancer.

Qiang Wei1, Dong-Sheng Chen2, Yuan-Hua Liu3.   

Abstract

Niraparib, an oral, potent, highly selective poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has promising clinical benefit for maintenance treatment of patients with ovarian cancer in partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, especially in patients with BRCA mutation. In publicly available niraparib treatment-related adverse events, gastrointestinal disorders and hematological toxicities were most commonly reported with manageable safety profile. Herein, we first describe a severe and never-reported pulmonary embolism (PE) associated with the use of niraparib in a patient with BRCA mutation advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer and received anticoagulant therapy after PE. There have been no reports of PE caused by the use of niraparib in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer; knowledge of the occurrence of PE after the use of niraparib may assist other clinicians in managing this rare but potentially serious toxic effect.
Copyright © 2022 Wei, Chen and Liu.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA mutation; Niraparib; ovarian cancer; pulmonary embolism

Year:  2022        PMID: 35359396      PMCID: PMC8960313          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.853211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


Background

Niraparib, an oral, potent, highly selective poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has promising clinical benefit for maintenance treatment of patients with ovarian cancer in partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, especially in patients with BRCA mutation or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD)-positive disease (1, 2). In publicly available niraparib treatment-related adverse events, the most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia and thrombocytopenia, and the most common treatment-emergent serious adverse events were small intestinal obstruction, thrombocytopenia and vomiting.1 Herein, we first describe a severe and never-reported PE associated with the use of niraparib in a patient with BRCA mutant advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer.

Case Presentation

A 55-year-old female patient was diagnosed with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer after comprehensive multidisciplinary consultation. Platinum-based chemotherapy was administered as first-line treatment, and the disease was evaluated as partial response. To seek for an effective maintenance therapy, tumor BRCA mutation and HRD status were analyzed using a next-generation sequencing assay in patient providing tissue sample in a CAP-authenticated lab. Subsequently, BRCA2 c.6860G>T (1.85% abundance), CDK12 c.956dupA (22.04% abundance), and ATM c.5692C>T (1.64% abundance) mutations ( ) were detected and confirmed by polymerase chain reaction assay, suggesting PARP inhibitor may show promising clinical benefit for the maintenance treatment.
Figure 1

(A–C) The integrative genomics viewer snapshot of BRCA2 c.6860G>T, CDK12 c.956dupA, and ATM c.5692C>T mutation. (D, E) Contrast-enhanced CT revealed dilated pulmonary veins with hypodense filling defect (E), 35.0 × 13.2 mm) highlighting the presence of thrombosis (arrow).

(A–C) The integrative genomics viewer snapshot of BRCA2 c.6860G>T, CDK12 c.956dupA, and ATM c.5692C>T mutation. (D, E) Contrast-enhanced CT revealed dilated pulmonary veins with hypodense filling defect (E), 35.0 × 13.2 mm) highlighting the presence of thrombosis (arrow). Two months after the ending of the last cycle of chemotherapy, niraparib (200 mg once daily) was administered for the following maintenance treatment; clinical and radiological follow-up within the first 2 months showed no evidence of progression and severe adverse reactions. In the second and a half month of taking niraparib, the patient was presented to the emergency room with the chief complaints of dyspnea, chest pain, and lower abdominal pain that had begun a few days earlier. On presentation, she was mild febrile and had tachycardia with a regular rate. Laboratory studies revealed activated partial thromboplastin time of 22.3 s (normal range (NR), 25.0 to 31.3 s); the serum D-dimer was 23.19 μg/ml (NR < 0.55 µg/ml); and the serum fibrinogen was 4.38 g/L (NR, 2–4 g/L). Other coagulation parameters such as prothrombin time and thrombin time were within normal ranges. Emergency contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) revealed dilated pulmonary veins with hypodense filling defect highlighting the presence of thrombosis (). Based on the clinical presentation, CT images, and remarkably increased serum D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, a diagnosis of PE caused by the use of niraparib was made; she was then transported to the high care unit under anticoagulant therapy. Three days after the treatment, CT examination detected the remaining thrombi and her serum D-dimer decreased to 3.66 μg/ml. A week later, she was discharged and discontinued from the use of niraparib; no PE symptoms occurred on the follow-up treatment.

Discussion

The standard of care for frontline therapy of advanced ovarian cancer is mainly platinum-based chemotherapy in some settings (3, 4). Although most patients respond to initial therapy, most of them will ultimately succumb to the disease. Usually, the recurrence of the disease poorly responds to first- and sometimes even second-line chemotherapy. In this scenario, it is possible that the ovarian cancer inherent resistance may be due to reduced immunosurveillance and drug-resistant cells (5, 6). PARP inhibitors are a new treatment approach for ovarian cancer and other cancers with underlying impaired DNA repair. For instance, PARP inhibitors also bring breakthrough progress in prostate cancer (7). The novel combinations of PARP inhibitors with other anticancer therapies, including inhibitors of VEGF, PD-1, or PD-L1, along with anti-CTLA 4 monoclonal antibodies, are well tolerated and clinically effective (8). In publicly available niraparib treatment-related adverse events, gastrointestinal disorders and hematological toxicities were most commonly reported with manageable safety profile. PE is a serious complication of surgery and a leading cause of death in women with gynecologic cancer. Serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC) is currently considered the precursor lesion of pelvic high-grade serous carcinoma. The incidence of STIC in BRCA1–2 variants was low (9). Early detection and adequate intervention are crucially important in order to prevent PE. In our case, the chief complaints of chest pain and lower abdominal pain suggested the possible presence of deep vein thrombosis. During the thrombosis process, the functions of the coagulation system, anticoagulation system, and fibrinolytic system are activated. D-dimer is a degradation product of fibrin, present in the blood when thrombi are broken down. The level of D-dimer reflects fibrin concentration and is known to have a high positive predictive value. In our case, remarkably increased fibrinogen levels and D-dimer levels suggested the rapid progression of blood coagulation and fibrinolysis. The contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed dilated pulmonary veins with hypodense filling defect highlighting the presence of thrombosis. Chemotherapy is considered a significant risk factor for cancer-associated thrombosis and may have contributed to its increasing incidence because of the harm on the vascular epithelium (10). In view of niraparib being administered for the maintenance treatment 2 months after the ending of the last cycle of chemotherapy, this eliminated the possibility of the side effect from chemotherapy. Finally, based on the clinical presentation, CT images, and remarkably increased serum D-dimer and fibrinogen levels, a diagnosis of PE caused by the use of niraparib was made. There are several reports of PE occurring after operation or during chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer (11–13). However, confirmed by publicly available niraparib treatment-related adverse events, there have been no reports of PE caused by the use of niraparib in patients with advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. In summary, we describe for the first time the occurrence of PE associated with the use of niraparib in a patient with BRCA mutant advanced high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Frankly speaking, we cannot give a detailed mechanism to explain the relationship between the use of niraparib and the occurrence of PE; we hypothesized that off-target inhibition of yet another ubiquitously expressed target may be responsible. Anyway, knowledge of the occurrence of PE after the use of niraparib may assist other clinicians in managing this rare but potentially serious toxic effect.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets for this article are not publicly available due to concerns regarding participant/patient anonymity. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

We were all involved in the clinical care and management of the patient, collecting the data, and drafting the manuscript. QW and DC collected data and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. YL supervised the work. All authors critically reviewed and approved the final version.

Conflict of Interest

Author DC was employed by Jiangsu Simcere Diagnostics Co. Ltd., Nanjing, China. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
  13 in total

1.  Niraparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer using an individualized starting dose (NORA): a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial.

Authors:  X H Wu; J Q Zhu; R T Yin; J X Yang; J H Liu; J Wang; L Y Wu; Z L Liu; Y N Gao; D B Wang; G Lou; H Y Yang; Q Zhou; B H Kong; Y Huang; L P Chen; G L Li; R F An; K Wang; Y Zhang; X J Yan; X Lu; W G Lu; M Hao; L Wang; H Cui; Q H Chen; G Abulizi; X H Huang; X F Tian; H Wen; C Zhang; J M Hou; M R Mirza
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  Cytogenetic analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer's stem cells: an overview on new diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  A S Laganà; F Colonese; E Colonese; V Sofo; F M Salmeri; R Granese; B Chiofalo; L Ciancimino; O Triolo
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.196

3.  Niraparib monotherapy for late-line treatment of ovarian cancer (QUADRA): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Kathleen N Moore; Angeles Alvarez Secord; Melissa A Geller; David Scott Miller; Noelle Cloven; Gini F Fleming; Andrea E Wahner Hendrickson; Masoud Azodi; Paul DiSilvestro; Amit M Oza; Mihaela Cristea; Jonathan S Berek; John K Chan; Bobbie J Rimel; Daniela E Matei; Yong Li; Kaiming Sun; Katarina Luptakova; Ursula A Matulonis; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Incidence of post-operative deep vein thrombosis in gynaecological oncology.

Authors:  A J Crandon; J Koutts
Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.100

5.  Efficacy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1-2 variants and clinical outcomes of follow-up in patients with isolated serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma (STIC).

Authors:  Carlo Saccardi; Stefania Zovato; Giulia Spagnol; Giulio Bonaldo; Matteo Marchetti; Lara Alessandrini; Silvia Tognazzo; Angela Guerriero; Amerigo Vitagliano; Antonio Simone Laganà; Marco Noventa
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Timing isn't everything: an analysis of when to start salvage chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; Todd Tillmanns; Taimur Chaudry; Michael Gold; Gary Johnson; Joan Walker; Robert Mannel
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Epithelial ovarian cancer inherent resistance: May the pleiotropic interaction between reduced immunosurveillance and drug-resistant cells play a key role?

Authors:  Antonio Simone Laganà; Vincenza Sofo; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Onofrio Triolo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-09-19

Review 8.  Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A New Light on an Old Story.

Authors:  Sidrah Shah; Afroditi Karathanasi; Antonios Revythis; Evangelia Ioannidou; Stergios Boussios
Journal:  Diseases       Date:  2021-05-04

9.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Derman Basaran; Thomas Boerner; Jessa Suhner; Dib Sassine; Ying Liu; Rachel N Grisham; William P Tew; Ginger J Gardner; Oliver Zivanovic; Yukio Sonoda; Kara Long Roche; Dennis S Chi; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Gerald A Soff; Elizabeth L Jewell
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2021-07-24       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 10.  Combined Strategies with Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors for the Treatment of Ovarian Cancer: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Stergios Boussios; Peeter Karihtala; Michele Moschetta; Afroditi Karathanasi; Agne Sadauskaite; Elie Rassy; Nicholas Pavlidis
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.