Literature DB >> 27995176

Epithelial ovarian cancer inherent resistance: May the pleiotropic interaction between reduced immunosurveillance and drug-resistant cells play a key role?

Antonio Simone Laganà1, Vincenza Sofo2, Salvatore Giovanni Vitale1, Onofrio Triolo1.   

Abstract

Cancer cells may have inherent chemoresistance which allows an indefinite expansion.•Transformed ovarian epithelial cells may undergo an immunoediting process.•Immunoedited ovarian cancer drug-resistant cells escape first-line chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27995176      PMCID: PMC5154672          DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2016.09.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep        ISSN: 2352-5789


Dear Editor, We read with great interest the paper by Giannakeas et al. (2016) about a novel mathematical model to describe ovarian cancer progression, based on the assumption that a small proportion of ovarian cancer cells are chemoresistant from the beginning. We truly appreciated accuracy of the reported information, which stimulated us to further to point out several elements, hoping to trigger a constructive debate. As appropriately stated by the Authors, slow-growing cancer stem cells may have inherent chemoresistance which allows an indefinite expansion, although limited due to the tendency for stem cells to undergo asymmetric self-renewal. Nevertheless, numerous important steps of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) initiation and progression may depend, at least in part, by the interaction between different types of committed stem cells within the ovary and the surrounding microenvironment. To date, accumulating evidence (Smolikova et al., 2012) suggests a pivotal role of several immune cells, including mast cells, T-cells, neutrophils and macrophages, in the remodeling processes after the ovulation. In this regard, the possible role of ovarian stem cells in the initiation and progression of EOC is getting growing attention: as widely reviewed by Thompson and Mok (2009), the typical upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines during ovulation may generate a local microenvironment which induce the transformation of normal ovarian epithelial cells within in the ovary; subsequently, these transformed ovarian epithelial cells may undergo an immunoediting process which orchestrates the interaction between the infiltrating immune cells and ovarian stromal microenvironment toward the progression of EOC. The notion that the immune system not only protects the host against tumor formation but also shapes tumor immunogenicity is the basis of the cancer immunoediting hypothesis, which stresses the dual host-protective and tumor-promoting actions of immunity on developing tumors. As summarized by Schreiber et al. (2011), this mechanism proceeds sequentially through three distinct phases termed “elimination” (the innate and adaptive immune systems work together to detect the presence of a developing tumor and destroy it before it becomes clinically apparent), “equilibrium” (rare tumor cell variants may survive the elimination phase and enter the equilibrium phase, in which the adaptive immune system prevents tumor cell outgrowth and also sculpts the immunogenicity of the tumor cells) and “escape” (tumor cells that have acquired the ability to circumvent immune recognition and/or destruction emerge as progressively growing, visible tumors). Corroborating this view, it was already demonstrated that high presence of intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (Zhang et al., 2003), low presence of FoxP3+ T regulatory cells (Tregs) TILs (Barnett et al., 2010) and high CD8 +/Treg ratio (Sato et al., 2005) correlate with improved survival in EOC. In addition, tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) seem to be crucial in the “immunoescaping” of EOC cells: according to recent data (Deng et al., 2015), M2 macrophages produce a selective cytokine pattern which address toward the immunosuppression respect to the M1 counterpart. Not surprisingly, it was recently evidenced that ovarian cancer drug-resistant cells promote the M2 polarization of macrophages through the proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ)/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway (Deng et al., 2015). From the clinical point of view, patients affected by EOC usually undergo satisfactory response to the initial surgical cytoreduction and chemotherapy, although most of them have drug-resistant recurrence later in time, that is conceivably due to the ability of ovarian cancer drug-resistant cells to escape first-line chemotherapy (Laganà et al., 2015). Recent data suggest that platinum- and taxane-based chemotherapy for EOC can enhance anti-tumor immunity through immunogenic cell death, resulting in increased T cell activation and tumor infiltration: such effects could potentially sensitize tumors to immunotherapies, including checkpoint blockade. In particular, neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with increased densities of cytotoxic (CD3+, CD8+, CD8TIA-1+, PD-1+ and CD20+) TILs (Lo et al., 2016), suggesting a possible key role for immunotherapy after the “canonical” chemotherapy in order to target drug-resistant EOC cells. In conclusion, we appreciate the mathematical model proposed by Giannakeas et al. (2016) and we solicit future studies about the topic in order to clarify the role of ovarian cancer drug-resistant cells in the initiation and progression of the disease, taking into account the role of immune system and surrounding microenvironment and addressing toward a tailored immune target-therapy.

Declaration of interest

All authors have no proprietary, financial, professional, or other personal interest of any nature in any product, service, or company. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper. No specific funding was obtained.
  10 in total

1.  Intraepithelial CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and a high CD8+/regulatory T cell ratio are associated with favorable prognosis in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Eiichi Sato; Sara H Olson; Jiyoung Ahn; Brian Bundy; Hiroyoshi Nishikawa; Feng Qian; Achim A Jungbluth; Denise Frosina; Sacha Gnjatic; Christine Ambrosone; James Kepner; Tosin Odunsi; Gerd Ritter; Shashikant Lele; Yao-Tseng Chen; Haruo Ohtani; Lloyd J Old; Kunle Odunsi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ovarian cancer stem cells induce the M2 polarization of macrophages through the PPARγ and NF-κB pathways.

Authors:  Xinchao Deng; Ping Zhang; Tingting Liang; Suye Deng; Xiaojie Chen; Lin Zhu
Journal:  Int J Mol Med       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 4.101

Review 3.  Cytogenetic analysis of epithelial ovarian cancer's stem cells: an overview on new diagnostic and therapeutic perspectives.

Authors:  A S Laganà; F Colonese; E Colonese; V Sofo; F M Salmeri; R Granese; B Chiofalo; L Ciancimino; O Triolo
Journal:  Eur J Gynaecol Oncol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 0.196

4.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Ovarian Cancer Results in Three Patterns of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Response with Distinct Implications for Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Charlotte S Lo; Sanaz Sanii; David R Kroeger; Katy Milne; Aline Talhouk; Derek S Chiu; Kurosh Rahimi; Patricia A Shaw; Blaise A Clarke; Brad H Nelson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Ovarian cancer tumor infiltrating T-regulatory (T(reg)) cells are associated with a metastatic phenotype.

Authors:  Jason C Barnett; Sarah M Bean; Regina S Whitaker; Eiji Kondoh; Tsukasa Baba; Shingo Fujii; Jeffrey R Marks; Holly K Dressman; Susan K Murphy; Andrew Berchuck
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Role of interleukins in the regulation of ovarian functions.

Authors:  K Smolikova; A Mlynarcikova; S Scsukova
Journal:  Endocr Regul       Date:  2012-10

Review 7.  Immunopathogenesis of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M S Thompson; S C Mok
Journal:  Minerva Med       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.806

8.  Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis A Gimotty; Marco Massobrio; Giorgia Regnani; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Heidi Gray; Katia Schlienger; Michael N Liebman; Stephen C Rubin; George Coukos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  A model for ovarian cancer progression based on inherent resistance.

Authors:  Vasily Giannakeas; Victoria Sopik; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity's roles in cancer suppression and promotion.

Authors:  Robert D Schreiber; Lloyd J Old; Mark J Smyth
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

  10 in total
  25 in total

1.  Real-world experience of olaparib as maintenance therapy in BRCA-mutated recurrent ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Angela Cho; Jeong-Yeol Park; Shin-Wha Lee; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Yong-Man Kim; Young-Tak Kim
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 2.344

Review 2.  Tumor markers of uterine cervical cancer: a new scenario to guide surgical practice?

Authors:  Gaetano Valenti; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Antonio Simone Laganà
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-09-16

Review 3.  New procedures for the identification of sentinel lymph node: shaping the horizon of future management in early stage uterine cervical cancer.

Authors:  Diego Rossetti; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Alessandro Tropea; Antonio Biondi; Antonio Simone Laganà
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2017-05-02

4.  RARE MALIGNANT FEMALE ADNEXAL TUMOR OF WOLFFIAN ORIGIN (FATWO) WITH MULTIPLE RELAPSES AND CHEMOTHERAPY REGIMENS.

Authors:  A Piciu; C Cainap; D Sur; A Havasi; B Fetica; O Balacescu; A Mester; S Cainap
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

5.  A prospective multicentric study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation patients.

Authors:  Vera Loizzi; Ettore Cicinelli; Vittoria Del Vecchio; Francesca Arezzo; Xheni Deromemaj; Anila Kardhashi; Angelo Paradiso; Francesco Legge; Maria Iole Natalicchio; Leonardo Resta; Nicoletta Resta; Daria Carmela Loconte; Gennaro Cormio
Journal:  Acta Biomed       Date:  2022-08-31

6.  LncRNA PART1 Stimulates the Development of Ovarian Cancer by Up-regulating RACGAP1 and RRM2.

Authors:  Hui Li; Yuansheng Lei; Shuangxue Li; Feng Li; Jieyun Lei
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Secondary and tertiary ovarian cancer recurrence: what is the best management?

Authors:  Simone Garzon; Antonio Simone Laganà; Jvan Casarin; Ricciarda Raffaelli; Antonella Cromi; Massimo Franchi; Fabio Barra; Ibrahim Alkatout; Simone Ferrero; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

Review 8.  Role of ultrasound in the detection of recurrent ovarian cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Andrea Rosati; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Mariateresa Mirandola; Virginia Vargiu; Camilla Fedele; Stefano Uccella; Carmine Vascone
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

9.  Pomalidomide with or without dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in Japan: a retrospective analysis by the Kansai Myeloma Forum.

Authors:  Yayoi Matsumura-Kimoto; Junya Kuroda; Hitomi Kaneko; Yuri Kamitsuji; Shin-Ichi Fuchida; Aya Nakaya; Hirohiko Shibayama; Nobuhiko Uoshima; Isao Yokota; Hitoji Uchiyama; Hideo Yagi; Satoru Kosugi; Toshimitsu Matsui; Jun Ishikawa; Mitsuhiro Matsuda; Kensuke Ohta; Masato Iida; Hirokazu Tanaka; Masayuki Kobayashi; Katsuya Wada; Chihiro Shimazaki; Shosaku Nomura; Kazunori Imada; Masayuki Hino; Itaru Matsumura; Yuzuru Kanakura; Akifumi Takaori-Kondo
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  Ovarian female adnexal tumor of probable Wolffian origin - Case report.

Authors:  Ljiljana Vučković; Aleksandra Klisic; Mirjana Miladinović
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2021-06-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.