Literature DB >> 35359250

Characterizing Musculoskeletal Tissue Mechanics Based on Shear Wave Propagation: A Systematic Review of Current Methods and Reported Measurements.

Jonathon Blank1, Matthew Blomquist2, Lesley Arant2, Stephanie Cone1, Joshua Roth3,4.   

Abstract

Developing methods for the non-invasive characterization of the mechanics of musculoskeletal tissues is an ongoing research focus in biomechanics. Often, these methods use the speed of shear wave propagation to characterize tissue mechanics (e.g., shear wave elastography and shear wave tensiometry). The primary purpose of this systematic review was to identify, compare, and contrast current methods for exciting and measuring shear wave propagation in musculoskeletal tissues. We conducted searches in the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases for studies published from January 1, 1900, to May 1, 2020. These searches targeted both shear wave excitation using acoustic pushes and mechanical taps, and shear wave speed measurement using ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, accelerometers, and laser Doppler vibrometers. Two reviewers independently screened and reviewed the articles, identifying 524 articles that met our search criteria. Regarding shear wave excitation, we found that acoustic pushes are useful for exciting shear waves through the thickness of the tissue of interest, and mechanical taps are useful for exciting shear waves in wearable applications. Regarding shear wave speed measurement, we found that ultrasound is used most broadly to measure shear waves due to its ability to study regional differences and target specific tissues of interest. The strengths of magnetic resonance imaging, accelerometers, and laser Doppler vibrometers make them advantageous to measure shear wave speeds for high-resolution shear wave imaging, wearable measurements, and non-contact ex vivo measurements, respectively. The advantages that each method offers for exciting and measuring shear waves indicate that a variety of systems can be assembled using currently available technologies to determine musculoskeletal tissue material behavior across a range of innovative applications.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Biomedical Engineering Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone; Cartilage; Laser Doppler vibrometry; Ligament; Magnetic resonance elastography; Muscle; Shear wave tensiometry; Tendon; Ultrasound elastography

Year:  2022        PMID: 35359250     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02935-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  72 in total

1.  Rapid magnetic resonance elastography of muscle using one-dimensional projection.

Authors:  Sabine F Bensamoun; Kevin J Glaser; Stacie I Ringleb; Qingshan Chen; Richard L Ehman; Kai-Nan An
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Biomechanical properties of the calcaneal tendon in vivo assessed by transient shear wave elastography.

Authors:  Sébastien Aubry; Jean-Romain Risson; Adrian Kastler; Benoit Barbier-Brion; Gaye Siliman; Michel Runge; Bruno Kastler
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Evaluation of the Effect of an Anisotropic Medium on Shear Wave Velocities of Intra-Muscular Gelatinous Inclusions.

Authors:  Sébastien Aubry; Jean-Philippe Nueffer; Mathieu Carrié
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Elastic properties of cancellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique.

Authors:  R B Ashman; J D Corin; C H Turner
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Shear Wave Elastography of the Lumbar Multifidus Muscle in Patients With Unilateral Lumbar Disk Herniation.

Authors:  Deniz Alis; Emine Sebnem Memis Durmaz; Ceren Alis; Burak Caglar Erol; Betul Okur; Osman Kizilkilic; Ismail Mihmanli
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Quantitative assessment of the masseter muscle's elasticity using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse.

Authors:  Iulia Badea; Attila Tamas-Szora; Ioana Chiorean; Floarea Fildan; Elisabeta Ciulea; Mîndra Badea
Journal:  Med Ultrason       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.611

7.  Evaluation of healthy and diseased muscle with magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Basford; Thomas R Jenkyn; Kai-Nan An; Richard L Ehman; Guido Heers; Kenton R Kaufman
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.966

8.  Shear wave vibrometry evaluation in transverse isotropic tissue mimicking phantoms and skeletal muscle.

Authors:  Sara Aristizabal; Carolina Amador; Bo Qiang; Randall R Kinnick; Ivan Z Nenadic; James F Greenleaf; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Distributing Synthetic Focusing Over Multiple Push-Detect Events Enhances Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging Performance.

Authors:  Rifat Ahmed; Marvin M Doyley
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Muscle shear wave elastography in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: a case-control study with MRI correlation.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M Alfuraih; Philip O'Connor; Ai Lyn Tan; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Andreas Ladas; Paul Emery; Richard J Wakefield
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.