Nicollas Nunes Rabelo1, João Paulo Mota Telles2, Leonardo Zumerkorn Pipek2, Louise Makarem3, Antonio Luis Boechat4, Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira2, Eberval Gadelha Figueiredo2. 1. Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. nicollasrabelo@hotmail.com. 2. Division of Neurosurgery, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. 3. School of Medicine, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil. 4. Department of Parasitology, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Brazil.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous meta-analyses comparing microsurgery and coiling that include BRAT may be inaccurate to compare the outcomes of ruptured saccular aneurysms. This study aims to evaluate 10-year efficiency, safety, and advantages of coiling compared with clipping in patients with spontaneous saccular aneurismal SAH as a primary outcome. Also analyzed secondary outcomes: no-occlusion, mortality, rebleeding, and retreatment. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature on microsurgical clipping versus coiling was done to identify RCTs with at least 10 years of follow-up published between 2000 and 2021. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2. Secondary outcomes were no-occlusion, mortality, rebleeding, and retreatment. Quality of the included trials was analyzed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Two studies reported 10-year follow-up results, and the meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between groups (OR 0.9, 95%CI 0.66-1.24, I2 = 21%). No differences were observed compared clipping and coiling regarding occlusion rates (OR 5.3, 95%CI 0.8-36.3, I2 = 89%). Mortality rates did not show significant differences between treatment modalities (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.77-1.21, I2 = 0%). Rebleeding rates were also similar between groups (OR 1.63, 95%CI 0.25-10.7, I2 = 37%); however, significantly higher retreatment rates were associated with coiling (OR 10.6, 95%CI 2.1-52.5, I2 = 80%). Overall, risk of bias was low. CONCLUSION: There are no long-term differences regarding no-occlusion, mortality, and rebleeding rates between coiling and clipping. Higher retreatment rates were associated with coiling.
INTRODUCTION: Previous meta-analyses comparing microsurgery and coiling that include BRAT may be inaccurate to compare the outcomes of ruptured saccular aneurysms. This study aims to evaluate 10-year efficiency, safety, and advantages of coiling compared with clipping in patients with spontaneous saccular aneurismal SAH as a primary outcome. Also analyzed secondary outcomes: no-occlusion, mortality, rebleeding, and retreatment. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature on microsurgical clipping versus coiling was done to identify RCTs with at least 10 years of follow-up published between 2000 and 2021. The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score ≤ 2. Secondary outcomes were no-occlusion, mortality, rebleeding, and retreatment. Quality of the included trials was analyzed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 (RoB 2.0) tool. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Two studies reported 10-year follow-up results, and the meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant differences between groups (OR 0.9, 95%CI 0.66-1.24, I2 = 21%). No differences were observed compared clipping and coiling regarding occlusion rates (OR 5.3, 95%CI 0.8-36.3, I2 = 89%). Mortality rates did not show significant differences between treatment modalities (OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.77-1.21, I2 = 0%). Rebleeding rates were also similar between groups (OR 1.63, 95%CI 0.25-10.7, I2 = 37%); however, significantly higher retreatment rates were associated with coiling (OR 10.6, 95%CI 2.1-52.5, I2 = 80%). Overall, risk of bias was low. CONCLUSION: There are no long-term differences regarding no-occlusion, mortality, and rebleeding rates between coiling and clipping. Higher retreatment rates were associated with coiling.
Authors: Andrew Molyneux; Richard Kerr; Irene Stratton; Peter Sandercock; Mike Clarke; Julia Shrimpton; Rury Holman Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-10-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: S Suzuki; A Kurata; M Yamada; K Iwamoto; K Nakahara; K Sato; J Niki; M Sasaki; T Kitahara; K Fujii; S Kan Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2011-04-29 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Cameron G McDougall; Robert F Spetzler; Joseph M Zabramski; Shahram Partovi; Nancy K Hills; Peter Nakaji; Felipe C Albuquerque Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2011-11-04 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Robert F Spetzler; Cameron G McDougall; Felipe C Albuquerque; Joseph M Zabramski; Nancy K Hills; Shahram Partovi; Peter Nakaji; Robert C Wallace Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2013-04-26 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Ali M Elhadi; Joseph M Zabramski; Kaith K Almefty; George A C Mendes; Peter Nakaji; Cameron G McDougall; Felipe C Albuquerque; Mark C Preul; Robert F Spetzler Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Robert F Spetzler; Cameron G McDougall; Joseph M Zabramski; Felipe C Albuquerque; Nancy K Hills; Jonathan J Russin; Shahram Partovi; Peter Nakaji; Robert C Wallace Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 5.115