| Literature DB >> 35358362 |
Carsten Peukert1, Sachin Popat Gholap2, Ori Green2, Lukas Pinkert1, Joop van den Heuvel3, Marco van Ham3, Doron Shabat2, Mark Brönstrup1.
Abstract
The sensitive detection of bacterial infections is a prerequisite for their successful treatment. The use of a chemiluminescent readout was so far hampered by an insufficient probe enrichment at the pathogens. We coupled siderophore moieties, that harness the unique iron transport system of bacteria, with enzyme-activatable dioxetanes and obtained seven trifunctional probes with high signal-to-background ratios (S/B=426-859). Conjugates with efficient iron transport capability into bacteria were identified through a growth recovery assay. All ESKAPE pathogens were labelled brightly by desferrioxamine conjugates, while catechols were weaker due to self-quenching. Bacteria could also be detected inside lung epithelial cells. The best probe 8 detected 9.1×103 CFU mL-1 of S. aureus and 5.0×104 CFU mL-1 of P. aeruginosa, while the analogous fluorescent probe 10 was 205-305fold less sensitive. This qualifies siderophore dioxetane probes for the selective and sensitive detection of bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Bacterial Diagnostics; Chemiluminescence; Drug Delivery; Imaging; Siderophores
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35358362 PMCID: PMC9322335 DOI: 10.1002/anie.202201423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl ISSN: 1433-7851 Impact factor: 16.823
Figure 1Design concept for bacteria‐targeting chemiluminescent dioxetanes. A) Untargeted dioxetanes diffuse into Gram‐positive bacteria, but uptake into Gram‐negative bacteria and activation is minor or absent due to their double‐layered cell membrane. Conjugation to siderophores enables active uptake via bacterial siderophore transporters (structures PDB: 1FEP and 1FCP). Subsequent enzymatic activation via the trigger moiety (pink), followed by the self‐immolation of the excited phenolate IV yields a bright luminescence emission. B) Structural variations of the siderophores with regard to their core, the number and the chemical nature of iron‐chelating groups. OM=outer membrane, IM=inner membrane, OMR=outer membrane receptor.
Figure 2Synthesis of dioxetanes 1–2 and siderophore dioxetane probes 3–9. A) See also Figures S1, S2 and S6. (i) K2CO3, DMF, 50 °C, 2 h, (ii) LiOH, THF:H2O (2 : 1), 50 °C, 2 h, 67 % over 2 steps, (iii) cat. methylene blue, O2, yellow light, DCM/DMF (9 : 1), 20 min, 67 % (iv) 31, iso‐butyl chloroformate, N‐methylmorpholine (NMM); THF, 0–25 °C, 2 h, then NMM, THF, 0–25 °C, 1 h, 43 %, (v) NHS, DCC, DCM, 1.5 h, (vi) 3‐azidopropan‐1‐amine, DMF, 30 min, 69 % over 2 steps, (vii) cat. methylene blue, O2, yellow light, DCM/DMF (9 : 1), 20 min, 85 %. B) See also Figures S2 and S3. (i) 21, Zn(OAc)2, DMSO/H2O (2 : 1), 23 °C, 5 min, then 20 in DMSO, 5 min, 23 °C; then sodium ascorbate/CuSO4, THPTA, 1×PBS pH 7.4, 23 °C, 1 h, 76 % (ii) 50 % TFA, anhydrous DCM, TIPS, 2 h, 25 °C, Et2O wash then centrifuge 4500 rcf, 15 min, 0 °C (iii) 23, 1 M HEPES buffer pH 7.5, DMF (1 : 1), overnight, 25 °C, 96 % over 2 steps, (iv) 2 a, MeOH, overnight, 25 °C, quantitative, (v) cat. methylene blue, DCM/DMF (1 : 9), O2, yellow light, 10 min, 85 %, (vi) 25, iso‐butyl‐chloroformate, NMM,THF, 0–23 °C, 2 h, then 24, NMM, THF, 0–23 °C, 1 h, 67 % (vii) cat. methylene blue, O2, yellow light, DCM/DMF (1 : 9), 1 % AcOH, 25 °C, 30 min, 47 %. C) See also Figures S4 and S5. (i) 26, TFA, DCM, 1 h, (ii) 16, NHS, DCC, DCM, (iii) TEA, DMF, yield over 3 steps 59 %, (iv) cat. methylene blue, O2, yellow light, DCM:DMF (9 : 1), 30 min, 84 %, (v) 28, 2‐azido acetic acid, sodium ascorbate, CuSO4, THPTA, DMSO, 1xPBS pH 7.4, 24 °C, 3 h, 1 % AcOH, 74 %, (vi) iso‐butyl chloroformate, NMM,THF, 0–23 °C, 2 h, (vii) 24, NMM, THF, 0–23 °C, 1 h, 67 % (viii) cat. methylene blue, O2, yellow light, DCM/DMF (1 : 9), 1 % AcOH, 25 °C, 30 min, 63 %. D) See also Figures S7 and S8. i) 13, DCC, NHS, 1.5 h, (ii) desferrioxamine (DFO) mesylate salt, TEA, DMF, 30 min, (iii) cat. methylene blue, O2, yellow light, DCM, 5 min, 52 % over 3 steps. (iv) 32, TEA, DMF, 40 %. For more details and substrate structures, see the Supporting Information.
Figure 3In vitro chemiluminescence induction. A) Total light emission for quinone oxidoreductase‐triggered dioxetanes 1–2 and siderophore‐conjugates 3—8 ± 1 mM NaBH4, n=3, error bars±standard error of mean (SEM). B) Signal‐to‐background (S/B) ratios for 1–9, n=3, error bars ± SEM. C) Chemiluminescence kinetic profiles following in vitro activation of 8 in PBS at pH 7.4 ± 1 mM NaBH4. D) Chemiluminescence kinetic profiles following in vitro activation of 9 in PBS at pH 7.4 ± β‐galactosidase [1.5 EU mL−1].
Figure 4Quenching of dioxetane chemiluminescence by catechols. A) Reagents were 1 (10 μM) in PBS at pH 7.4, ± 30 μM quencher Q1 (2,3‐dihydroxybenzoic acid), Q2 (2,3‐diacetoxybenzoic acid) or Q3 (dimethoxybenzoic acid), ± 1 mM NaBH4 as a chemical activator. B) Chemiluminescence kinetic profiles and C) summed chemiluminescence over 60 minutes in [RLU] for 10 μM probe 1 ± 30 μM quencher Q1, Q2 or Q3 and ± 1 mM NaBH4 as a chemical activator, including controls (Q +1, Q , PBS),n=3, error bars correspond to±standard error of mean (SEM). Controls are shown in Figure S9A.
Figure 5Probe‐induced growth recovery in siderophore‐deficient E. coli and P. aeruginosa mutants. A) Growth recovery in the E. coli wildtype and enterobactin (ENT)—deficient strain ΔentA. The relative growth normalized to ENT is plotted in %. B) Growth recovery in the P. aeruginosa wildtype and pyoverdine, pyochelin (PYO)—deficient strain. The relative growth, normalized to PYO is plotted in %. All bacteria were grown in phosphate‐buffered LMR medium and incubated in the presence of 10 μM compound (or 1 % DMSO) and 10 μM FeCl3 for 48 hours at 37 °C, n=3. Error bars correspond to±standard error of mean (SEM).
Figure 6Chemiluminescence kinetics in bacterial pathogens. A) Conjugate 8±Gram‐negative bacteria (E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii). B) Conjugate 8±Gram‐positive bacteria (E. faecium, S. aureus). C) Conjugate 9 ± Gram‐negative bacteria E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii). D) Conjugate 9 ± Gram‐positive bacteria (E. faecium, S. aureus). E) Control 2 ± Gram‐positive and ‐negative bacteria (E. faecium, S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii). Dotted lines correspond to the ± standard error of mean (SEM), (n=3). F) Total photon count of 2, 8 and 9 over 20 h. All experiments n = 3, final probe concentration of 10 μM in iron‐depleted, cation‐adjusted medium (IDCAM). The error bars correspond to the ± standard error of the mean (SEM). t max indicates the time point with the highest luminescence signal.
Figure 7Characterization of turn‐on fluorescent TML‐coumarin DFO conjugate 10. A) Structure of 10. The siderophore is shown in black, the coumarin dye in green and the TML trigger in pink. B) Fluorescence kinetics after chemical activation of 10 (10 μM) ±1 mM NaBH4 in PBS at pH 7.4 over 2.5 hours. n = 3, dotted lines depict ± standard error of mean (SEM). C) Signal‐to‐background ratio of 10 ± 1 mM NaBH4. Error bars correspond to ± SEM. D) Fluorescence kinetic profiles of 10 (10 μM)±bacterial pathogens, n=4, dotted lines depict ± SEM. E) Summed fluorescence intensities, n=4, error ± SEM.
Figure 8Detection of intracellular bacteria in A549 lung epithelial cells. A) Experimental workflow for A549 lung epithelial cell (LEC) infection and subsequent bacterial chemiluminescence imaging of P. aeruginosa or S. aureus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10. B) Chemiluminescence kinetic profiles of LECs infected with S. aureus followed by gentamicin treatment or a thorough wash and incubation with 8. C) Chemiluminescence kinetic profiles of LECs infected with P. aeruginosa followed by gentamicin treatment or a thorough wash and incubation with 8. D) Chemiluminescence kinetic profiles of LECs treated with gentamicin or with a thorough wash and incubated with 8. E) Quantification of intracellular bacteria after infection of A549 LECs with S. aureus or P. aeruginosa. F) Summed luminescence values for S. aureus treatments including controls. G) Summed luminescence values for P. aeruginosa treatments including controls. Dotted lines and error bars correspond to ± standard error of mean (SEM), n=3–6. All experiments in iron‐depleted, cation‐adjusted medium (IDCAM). The summed intensities in F) and G) were compared by two‐way ANOVA (****, p<0.0001). Gent.=gentamicin.
Figure 9LOD determination of siderophores probes. A) To determine the limit of detection (LOD), cultures of S. aureus or P. aeruginosa were iron‐starved, then serially diluted in iron‐depleted, cation adjusted medium and then incubated with chemiluminescent probe 8 or fluorescent probe 10 (10 μM each). Total integrated signal after 24 h of incubation of B) 8 with S. aureus, C) 8 with P. aeruginosa, D) 10 with S. aureus and E) 10 with P. aeruginosa (mean ± SEM, n=4) is shown. Horizontal lines show the mean signal of probe in medium ± SEM (dashed) of control samples lacking bacteria. Best‐fit lines show linear regressions of the log‐transformed data. For all experiments, each sample was compared to the no‐bacteria control by one‐way ANOVA (***, p=0.001–0.005, **** p<0.0001). The signal‐to‐background (S/B) ratios were plotted against different S. aureus F) and P. aeruginosa G) concentrations for the two probes. The S/B ratios of the two probes were compared by two‐way ANOVA (****, p<0.0001).