Literature DB >> 35356701

Evaluating connections between nitrogen cycling and the macrofauna in native oyster beds in a New England estuary.

S G Ayvazian1, Nicholas E Ray2, Anna Gerber-Williams3, Sinead Grabbert3, Adam Pimenta1, Boze Hancock4, Donald Cobb1, Charles Strobel1, R W Fulweiler2.   

Abstract

Recent efforts to quantify biogeochemical and ecological processes in oyster habitats have focused on provision of habitat and regulation of the nitrogen cycle. However, it is unclear how these two processes may interact. In this study, seasonal patterns of habitat use and nitrogen removal from natural oyster beds were quantified for comparison with nearby bare sediment in Green Hill Pond, a temperate coastal lagoon in Rhode Island USA. Relationships were tested between benthic macrofaunal abundance and nitrogen removal via denitrification and burial in sediments. Nitrogen removal by oyster bio-assimilation was quantified and compared with nearby oyster aquaculture. Despite limited differences in habitat use by macrofauna, there were fewer non-oyster benthic organisms (e.g., filter-feeders, detritivores) where oysters were present, possibly due to competition for resources. Additionally, low rugosity of the native oyster beds provided little refuge value for prey. There was a shift from net N removal via denitrification in bare sediments to nitrogen fixation beneath oysters, though this change was not statistically significant (t(96) = 1.201; p = 0.233). Sediments contained low concentrations of N, however sediments beneath oysters contained almost twice as much N (0.07%) as bare sediments (0.04%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in tissue N content between wild oysters and those raised in aquaculture nearby, though caged oysters had more tissue per shell mass and length, and therefore removed more N on a shell length basis. These oyster beds lacked the complex structure of 3-dimensional oyster reefs which may have diminished their ability to provide habitat for refugia, foraging sites for macrofauna, and conditions known to stimulate denitrification.

Entities:  

Keywords:  denitrification; macrofauna; nutrient fluxes; oyster beds

Year:  2021        PMID: 35356701      PMCID: PMC8958940          DOI: 10.1007/s12237-021-00954-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Estuaries Coast        ISSN: 1559-2723            Impact factor:   2.976


  14 in total

1.  Nitrogen extraction potential of wild and cultured bivalves harvested from nearshore waters of Cape Cod, USA.

Authors:  Joshua Reitsma; Diane C Murphy; Abigail F Archer; Richard H York
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.553

2.  Nutrient bioassimilation capacity of aquacultured oysters: quantification of an ecosystem service.

Authors:  Colleen B Higgins; Kurt Stephenson; Bonnie L Brown
Journal:  J Environ Qual       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.751

3.  Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Oyster Aquaculture.

Authors:  Nicholas E Ray; Timothy J Maguire; Alia N Al-Haj; Maria C Henning; Robinson W Fulweiler
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 4.  Rebuilding marine life.

Authors:  Carlos M Duarte; Susana Agusti; Edward Barbier; Gregory L Britten; Juan Carlos Castilla; Jean-Pierre Gattuso; Robinson W Fulweiler; Terry P Hughes; Nancy Knowlton; Catherine E Lovelock; Heike K Lotze; Milica Predragovic; Elvira Poloczanska; Callum Roberts; Boris Worm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Opportunities and Challenges for Including Oyster-Mediated Denitrification in Nitrogen Management Plans.

Authors:  Julie M Rose; J Stephen Gosnell; Suzanne Bricker; Mark J Brush; Allison Colden; Lora Harris; Eric Karplus; Alix Laferriere; Nathaniel H Merrill; Tammy B Murphy; Joshua Reitsma; Johnny Shockley; Kurt Stephenson; Seth Theuerkauf; Dan Ward; Robinson W Fulweiler
Journal:  Estuaries Coast       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 2.976

6.  Reversal of the net dinitrogen gas flux in coastal marine sediments.

Authors:  R W Fulweiler; S W Nixon; B A Buckley; S L Granger
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Factors regulating the accumulation and spatial distribution of the emerging contaminant triclosan in the sediments of an urbanized estuary: Greenwich Bay, Rhode Island, USA.

Authors:  David R Katz; Mark G Cantwell; Julia C Sullivan; Monique M Perron; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho; Michael A Charpentier
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Habitat benefits of restored oyster reefs and aquaculture to fish and invertebrates in a coastal pond in Rhode Island, US.

Authors:  Suzanne Ayvazian; Anna Gerber-Williams; Sinead Grabbert; Kenneth Miller; Boze Hancock; William Helt; Donald Cobb; Charles Strobel
Journal:  J Shellfish Res       Date:  2020-12-28       Impact factor: 1.396

9.  Historical ecology with real numbers: past and present extent and biomass of an imperilled estuarine habitat.

Authors:  Philine S E Zu Ermgassen; Mark D Spalding; Brady Blake; Loren D Coen; Brett Dumbauld; Steve Geiger; Jonathan H Grabowski; Raymond Grizzle; Mark Luckenbach; Kay McGraw; William Rodney; Jennifer L Ruesink; Sean P Powers; Robert Brumbaugh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing of Sediment Bacterial Communities in an Oyster Farm in Rhode Island.

Authors:  Joshua T E Stevens; Robinson W Fulweiler; Priyanka Roy Chowdhury
Journal:  Microbiol Resour Announc       Date:  2019-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.