Literature DB >> 33551544

Habitat benefits of restored oyster reefs and aquaculture to fish and invertebrates in a coastal pond in Rhode Island, US.

Suzanne Ayvazian1, Anna Gerber-Williams2, Sinead Grabbert2, Kenneth Miller3, Boze Hancock4, William Helt5, Donald Cobb1, Charles Strobel1.   

Abstract

Oyster habitat restoration seeks to recover lost ecosystem services including increased provisioning of refuge and foraging habitat for fish and invertebrate communities. The goal of this study was to quantify the ecosystem service benefit of habitat provisioning in Ninigret Pond, RI following oyster restoration. We measured four metrics, abundance, biomass, species richness and diversity, as well as isotopic composition in fish and invertebrates collected seasonally from restored oyster, aquaculture, and bare sediment sites, to examine whether the oyster habitat outperformed the bare sediment habitat. Sampling locations were chosen in Foster's Cove north and south, Grassy Point, South Sanctuary, and an Aquaculture lease; each had two restored oyster sites and one bare sediment site. Each site was sampled using a box trap, seine net, shrimp trap, and minnow trap. Oyster habitats had significantly greater metrics than did bare sediment habitats in some comparisons from the box trap and seine net samples. Restored oyster sites at South Sanctuary had lower metric values than the other oyster sites. Metrics from the Aquaculture sites were comparable to the Foster's Cove and Grassy Point restored oyster sites and often outperformed South Sanctuary restored oyster sites. Seasonally, spring and autumn samples tended to have higher abundance and biomass values than summer. Isotopic composition of five species occurring at both restored oyster and bare sediment sites demonstrated some differences in the trophic levels between species but not between habitat types. In Ninigret Pond, fish and invertebrate abundance, biomass, species richness, and diversity benefit from the use of oyster and bare sediment habitats. Coastal zone managers interested in restoring the ecological function of oyster reefs to support fish and invertebrate communities should consider strategically locating restoration projects within the mosaic of structured habitats and monitoring them for selected ecosystem services.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aquaculture; habitat preference; nekton; oyster reef; restoration

Year:  2020        PMID: 33551544      PMCID: PMC7859913          DOI: 10.2983/035.039.0306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shellfish Res        ISSN: 0730-8000            Impact factor:   1.396


  8 in total

Review 1.  Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems.

Authors:  J B Jackson; M X Kirby; W H Berger; K A Bjorndal; L W Botsford; B J Bourque; R H Bradbury; R Cooke; J Erlandson; J A Estes; T P Hughes; S Kidwell; C B Lange; H S Lenihan; J M Pandolfi; C H Peterson; R S Steneck; M J Tegner; R R Warner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  The robustness of ecological indicators to detect long-term changes in the macrobenthos of estuarine systems.

Authors:  Joana Patrício; João Magalhães Neto; Heliana Teixeira; Fuensanta Salas; João Carlos Marques
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2009-04-14       Impact factor: 3.130

Review 3.  Rebuilding marine life.

Authors:  Carlos M Duarte; Susana Agusti; Edward Barbier; Gregory L Britten; Juan Carlos Castilla; Jean-Pierre Gattuso; Robinson W Fulweiler; Terry P Hughes; Nancy Knowlton; Catherine E Lovelock; Heike K Lotze; Milica Predragovic; Elvira Poloczanska; Callum Roberts; Boris Worm
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Factors regulating the accumulation and spatial distribution of the emerging contaminant triclosan in the sediments of an urbanized estuary: Greenwich Bay, Rhode Island, USA.

Authors:  David R Katz; Mark G Cantwell; Julia C Sullivan; Monique M Perron; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho; Michael A Charpentier
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Historical ecology with real numbers: past and present extent and biomass of an imperilled estuarine habitat.

Authors:  Philine S E Zu Ermgassen; Mark D Spalding; Brady Blake; Loren D Coen; Brett Dumbauld; Steve Geiger; Jonathan H Grabowski; Raymond Grizzle; Mark Luckenbach; Kay McGraw; William Rodney; Jennifer L Ruesink; Sean P Powers; Robert Brumbaugh
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Australian shellfish ecosystems: Past distribution, current status and future direction.

Authors:  Chris L Gillies; Ian M McLeod; Heidi K Alleway; Peter Cook; Christine Crawford; Colin Creighton; Ben Diggles; John Ford; Paul Hamer; Gideon Heller-Wagner; Emma Lebrault; Agnès Le Port; Kylie Russell; Marcus Sheaves; Bryn Warnock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A global spatial analysis reveals where marine aquaculture can benefit nature and people.

Authors:  Seth J Theuerkauf; James A Morris; Tiffany J Waters; Lisa C Wickliffe; Heidi K Alleway; Robert C Jones
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Assessing shoreline exposure and oyster habitat suitability maximizes potential success for sustainable shoreline protection using restored oyster reefs.

Authors:  Megan K La Peyre; Kayla Serra; T Andrew Joyner; Austin Humphries
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Evaluating connections between nitrogen cycling and the macrofauna in native oyster beds in a New England estuary.

Authors:  S G Ayvazian; Nicholas E Ray; Anna Gerber-Williams; Sinead Grabbert; Adam Pimenta; Boze Hancock; Donald Cobb; Charles Strobel; R W Fulweiler
Journal:  Estuaries Coast       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.976

2.  Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.

Authors:  Matthew C Harwell; Chloe A Jackson
Journal:  Sustainability       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.