Literature DB >> 35355224

Asymmetric affective perspective taking effects toward valence influenced by personality perspective taken.

Limor Binyamin-Suissa1, Shachar Hochman2, Avishai Henik2,3.   

Abstract

Previously, we found that taking perspectives of two polar targets of the neuroticism dimension of personality influenced affect evaluations of negative pictures more than positive pictures. As neuroticism is more reactive to negative affects, the current follow-up experiment explores the effect of affective perspective taking (APT) when perspectives are derived from extroversion, which is more reactive to positive affects. Stimuli consisted of neutral, sad, and happy pictures, which were rated from the perspectives of an introvert and an extrovert. Emotional strength rating was a dependent variable, and N = 41. We found a significant interaction between APT and valence. The difference in ratings between adopting an introverted and an extroverted perspective toward happiness was larger than toward sadness. Together with the results from our previous study, these results suggest an asymmetric influence of APT toward positive and negative valances and that the direction of influence asymmetry depends on the type of personality dimension from which perspectives are derived.
© 2022. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Happiness; Perspective taking; Sadness; Valence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35355224     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02090-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  26 in total

1.  An fMRI study of personality influences on brain reactivity to emotional stimuli.

Authors:  T Canli; Z Zhao; J E Desmond; E Kang; J Gross; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity.

Authors:  Maarten A S Boksem; Mattie Tops; Anne E Wester; Theo F Meijman; Monicque M Lorist
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Perspective mistaking: Accurately understanding the mind of another requires getting perspective, not taking perspective.

Authors:  Tal Eyal; Mary Steffel; Nicholas Epley
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2018-04

4.  Perspective taking and emotion: The case of disgust and sadness.

Authors:  Limor Binyamin-Suissa; Natali Moyal; Alona Naim; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2019-07-03

5.  Perspective taking effects are modulated by the valence of stimuli.

Authors:  Limor Binyamin-Suissa; Shachar Hochman; Natali Moyal; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2021-02-25

6.  Age-related decline in emotional perspective-taking: Its effect on the late positive potential.

Authors:  Carina Fernandes; A R Gonçalves; R Pasion; F Ferreira-Santos; F Barbosa; I P Martins; J Marques-Teixeira
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Too much experience: a desensitization bias in emotional perspective taking.

Authors:  Troy Campbell; Ed O'Brien; Leaf Van Boven; Norbert Schwarz; Peter Ubel
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2014-02

8.  Negative and Neutral Valences of Affective Theory of Mind are More Impaired than Positive Valence in Clinically Stable Schizophrenia Patients.

Authors:  Thammanard Charernboon
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 9.  Cognitive and Affective Perspective-Taking: Evidence for Shared and Dissociable Anatomical Substrates.

Authors:  Meghan L Healey; Murray Grossman
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder.

Authors:  Alexander L Anwyl-Irvine; Jessica Massonnié; Adam Flitton; Natasha Kirkham; Jo K Evershed
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.