Literature DB >> 35355173

Surgical Treatment for Choledocholithiasis Following Repeated Failed Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography.

Muhammad Younis1, Niv Pencovich2, Reut El-On1, Nir Lubezky1, Yaacov Goykhman1, Adam Phillips3, Ido Nachmany4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the first line treatment for choledocholithiasis. In many occasions, several attempts of ERCP are performed until failure is declared and surgical treatment is applied, in many times following procedure-related complications. We present the results of surgical management of patients with choledocholithiasis following repeated failures of ERCP due to impaction of multiple large stones.
METHODS: Patients that underwent surgical treatment for choledocholithiasis following repeated ERCP attempts between January 2006 and December 2018 were retrospectively assessed. Post-ERCP complications were evaluated and the surgical approach, technique, and outcomes were assessed.
RESULTS: One hundred and two patients were operated on for choledocholithiasis following repeated failed ERCP. All the patients had at least 2 failed attempts (mean = 3.2 ± 1.7), and 25 (23.5%) suffered major ERCP-related complications. Following choledochotomy and stone extraction, bilioenteric anastomosis was done in the vast majority of patients (90.2%), most commonly choledochoduodenostomy (62%). Thirty-eight (37%) patients had minimally invasive procedure (laparoscopic n = 26, robotic assisted n = 12). Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) occurred in 24 patients (23.5%). Nine patients (8.8%) were re-operated and 10 (9.8%) were readmitted within 30 days from surgery. Three patients died within 30 days from surgery. Older patients had significantly more ERCP attempts and suffered higher post-operative mortality. During a median follow-up of 70 months, the only biliary complication was an anastomotic stricture in one patient.
CONCLUSION: Surgery for CBDS after failure of ERCP is safe and provides a highly effective long-term solution.
© 2022. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile duct; Choledochoduodenostomy; Choledochotomy; Hepaticojejunostomy; T-tube

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35355173     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05309-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.267


  12 in total

1.  A prospective study of common bile duct calculi in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: natural history of choledocholithiasis revisited.

Authors:  Chris Collins; Donal Maguire; Adrian Ireland; Edward Fitzgerald; Gerald C O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Management of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Eric S Hungness; Nathaniel J Soper
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforation: Management and prevention.

Authors:  Varayu Prachayakul; Pitulak Aswakul
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 1.337

4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus surgery for choledocholithiasis - A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fernando C Schacher; Sofia M Giongo; Fernanda J P Teixeira; Ângelo Z Mattos
Journal:  Ann Hepatol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.400

5.  Management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related perforations: Experience of a tertiary center.

Authors:  Roi Weiser; Niv Pencovich; Liat Mlynarsky; Adi Berliner-Senderey; Guy Lahat; Erwin Santo; Joseph M Klausner; Ido Nachmany
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Laparoscopic choledochoduodenostomy as a reliable rescue procedure for complicated bile duct stones.

Authors:  Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Dhawal Sharma; Sandeep C Sabnis; S Srivatsan Gurumurthy; E Senthil Anand; V P Nalankilli; Natesan Anand Vijai; Palanivelu Praveen Raj; Ramakrishnan Parthasarathy; Subbaiah Rajapandian; Chinnusamy Palanivelu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Christine Kapral; Lars Aabakken; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Andrea Tringali; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Torsten Beyna; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Istvan Hritz; Alberto Mariani; Gregorios Paspatis; Franco Radaelli; Sundeep Lakhtakia; Andrew M Veitch; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 10.093

Review 8.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related adverse events: post-ERCP pancreatitis.

Authors:  Tarun Rustagi; Priya A Jamidar
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01

Review 9.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related adverse events: general overview.

Authors:  Tarun Rustagi; Priya A Jamidar
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2015-01

10.  [Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with anatomic abnormalities of the stomach due to surgery].

Authors:  Patricia Ruiz Cuesta; Antonio José Hervás Molina; María Muñoz García-Borruel; Juan Jurado García; Valle García Sánchez; María Pleguezuelo Navarro; Luis Leonardo Casáis Juanena; Antonio Naranjo Rodríguez
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.