| Literature DB >> 35355159 |
Maximilian Fischer1,2, Tobias Weinberger1,2, Guido Boening3, Andrei Todica4,5, Denise Messerer1,2, Mathias J Zacherl3, Christian Schulz1,2, Steffen Massberg1,2, Peter Bartenstein3, Sebastian Lehner3,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Animal models for myocardial injuries represent important cornerstones in cardiovascular research to monitor the pathological processes and therapeutic approaches. We investigated the association of 18F-FDG derived left ventricular metabolic volume (LVMV), defect area and cardiac function in mice after permanent or transient ligation of the left anterior descending artery (LAD).Entities:
Keywords: 18F-FDG; Cardiac positron emission tomography; Heart function; Ischemia–reperfusion injury; Myocardial infarction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35355159 PMCID: PMC9132804 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-022-01734-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Nucl Med ISSN: 0914-7187 Impact factor: 2.258
Fig. 1Assessment of myocardial defect in 18F-FDG PET imaging after transient and permanent LAD ligation. A Representative polar bulls-eye image of the left ventricle in IR day 6 and day 30 (upper images) and MI day 6 and day 30 (lower images) showing the defect by diminished 18F-FDG uptake. Colour Scale from QPS (Cool and in percentage range). B Representative histology section of hearts 30 days after IR (upper panel) and MI (lower panel) LAD ligation. Right ventricle (RV), left ventricle (LV). Sirius Red fast green staining of the left ventricle indicates the defect area. Bar equals 100 µm. C Quantification of the left ventricular defect after IR injury (in grey) and MI (in rose). D and E Correlation of histological defect to PET defect at day 30 after IR and MI injury. All groups: n = 9–10. All data represent mean ± SD. *p = 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 2Alterations in LVMV and cardiac %ID/g after transient and permanent LAD ligation. A Representative static image after permanent LAD ligation exported from Siemens Inveon Workplace in different axes (left (L), right (R), planar (P), anterior (A), inferior (I), and sagittal (S). Bar equals uptake in from 0 to 5.9 × 106 Bq/ml. Quantification of the cardiac %ID/g in the different groups on the right side. Control (in white), MI (in rose), and IR (in grey). All groups: n = 8–10. All data represent mean ± SD. *p = 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. B Illustration of the LVMV (in green) after permanent LAD ligation. Quantification of the LVMV after transient and permanent LAD ligation is shown on the right side. All groups: n = 8–10. All data represent mean ± SD. *p = 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 3Increasing LVMV from day 6 to day 30 and correlation to defect area. A Difference in LVMV and %ID/g from day 30 to day 6 among the two cardiac injury models. B Quantification of the maximum ID/g among the different experimental groups. C Correlation of LVMV d30-d6 to defect area at day 6 (on the left side) and to day 30 (on the right side). All groups: n = 8–10. All data represent mean ± SD. *p = 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. D Correlation of LVMV d30-d6 to histological defect area after MI and IR injury
Fig. 4Longitudinal functional left ventricular parameters. A Illustrates three-dimensional evaluation from QGS software of the left ventricular EDV in the RAO view. Left picture: EDV at IR day 30 and right picture: EDV at MI day 30 illustrating the LV dilation. B Comparison of cardiac volume and function parameters at day 6 and d 30. Control (in white), IR (in grey) and MI (in rose). All groups: n = 8–10. All data represent mean ± SD. *p = 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
Fig. 5Correlation of LVMV to %ID/g and cardiac function parameters. Correlation of LVMV to EDV (A) after MI and IR injury. Data resemble cumulative day 6 and day 30. Illustration of the correlation of ESV (B), SV (C), and EF (D) to LVMV after permanent and transient LAD ligation. Pearson correlation was used for all analyses