| Literature DB >> 32397287 |
Praveen Vasudevan1,2, Ralf Gäbel1,2, Jan Stenzel3, Joanna Förster3, Jens Kurth4, Brigitte Vollmar5, Bernd Joachim Krause4, Hüseyin Ince6, Robert David1,2, Cajetan Immanuel Lang6.
Abstract
Cellular inflammation is an integral part of the healing process following acute myocardial infarction and has been under intense investigation for both therapeutic and prognostic approaches. Monocytes and macrophages are metabolically highly active and show increased uptake rates of glucose and its analog, 18F-FDG. Yet, the specific allocation of the radioactivity to the inflammatory cells via positron emission tomography (PET) imaging requires the suppression of glucose metabolism in viable myocardium. In mice, the most important model organism in basic research, this can be achieved by the application of ketamine/xylazine (KX) for anesthesia instead of isoflurane. Yet, while the consensus exists that glucose metabolism is effectively suppressed, a strategy for reproducible image analysis is grossly lacking and causes uncertainty concerning data interpretation. We introduce a simple strategy for systematic image analysis, which is a prerequisite to evaluate therapies targeting myocardial inflammation. Mice underwent permanent occlusion of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), inducing an acute myocardial infarction (MI). Five days after MI induction, 10MBq 18F-FDG was injected intravenously and a static PET/CT scan under ketamine/xylazine anesthesia was performed. For image reconstruction, we used an algorithm based on three-dimensional ordered subsets expectation maximization (3D-OSEM) followed by three-dimensional ordinary Poisson maximum a priori (MAP) reconstruction. Using this approach, high focal tracer uptake was typically located in the border zone of the infarct by visual inspection. To precisely demarcate the border zone for reproducible volume of interest (VOI) positioning, our protocol relies on positioning VOIs around the whole left ventricle, the inferobasal wall and the anterolateral wall guided by anatomical landmarks. This strategy enables comparable data in mouse studies, which is an important prerequisite for using a PET-based assessment of myocardial inflammation as a prognostic tool in therapeutic applications.Entities:
Keywords: FDG-PET; acute myocardial infarction; image analysis; imaging inflammation; mouse model
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32397287 PMCID: PMC7246846 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21093340
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 118F-FDG PET/CT fusion images of healthy mice anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (A) in comparison with isoflurane (B). The upper images show representative coronal planes, the lower images the corresponding axial plane.
Figure 218F-FDG PET/CT fusion images of healthy mice anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (A) and isoflurane (B); n = 2 per group. Representative standard VOIs are placed in whole LV (purple arrow), remote (red arrow) and infarct region (green arrow).
Figure 318F-FDG PET images of mice 5 days after MI induction anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine (A) in comparison with isoflurane (B). Both axial (left) and coronal planes (right) are shown. The respective PET image is shown under each PET/CT fusion image.
Figure 4Representative examples of the analysis strategy underlying the protocol for both mice anesthetized with isoflurane (A) and ketamine/xylazine (B) 5 days after MI induction (n = 4 per group). The “entire left ventricle” VOI reflects the global FDG uptake of the LV (purple arrow). The “remote” VOI was positioned in the inferobasal wall and reflects viable myocardium (red arrow). The “infarct” VOI reflects infarct tissue and contains almost no cardiomyocytes (green arrow). *: p < 0.05 compared to animals anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine. Values are presented as mean ± SD. Values are presented as mean ± SD. p-values were calculated using the student t-test.
Figure 518F-FDG PET/CT fusion images of a healthy mouse anesthetized with isoflurane. The left ventricle can be clearly identified in both coronal (A) and axial (B) planes. VOIs of 5 µL are placed in the inferobasal wall (red arrow) and the anterolateral wall (green arrow).