Literature DB >> 35355145

Permeability of P. gingivalis or its metabolic products through collagen and dPTFE membranes and their effects on the viability of osteoblast-like cells: an in vitro study.

Giuseppina Nocca1,2, Pierfrancesco Filetici3,4, Francesca Bugli5,6, Alvaro Mordente7,5, Antonio D'Addona8,9, Leonardo Dassatti8,9.   

Abstract

Membrane exposure is a widely reported and relatively common complication in Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) procedures. The introduction of micro-porous dPTFE barriers, which are impervious to bacterial cells, could reduce the technique sensitivity to membrane exposure, even if there are no studies investigating the potential passage of bacterial metabolites through the barrier. Aim of this study was the in vitro evaluation of the permeability of three different GBR membranes (dPTFE, native and cross-linked collagen membranes) to Porphyromonas gingivalis; in those cases, where bacterial penetration could not be observed, another purpose was the analysis of the viability and differentiation capability of an osteosarcoma (U2OS) cell line in presence of bacteria eluate obtained through membrane percolation. A system leading to the percolation of P. gingivalis broth culture through the experimental membranes was arranged to assess the permeability to bacteria after 24 and 72 h of incubation. The obtained solution was then added to U2OS cell cultures which underwent, after 10 days of incubation, MTT and red alizarin essays. The dPTFE membrane showed resistance to bacterial penetration, while both types of collagen membranes were crossed by P. gingivalis after 24 h. The bacteria eluate filtered through dPTFE membrane didn't show any toxicity on U2OS cells. Results of this study demonstrate that dPTFE membranes can contrast the penetration of both P. gingivalis and its metabolites toxic for osteoblast-like cells. The toxicity analysis was not possible for the collagen membranes, since permeability to bacterial cells was observed within the first period of incubation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Society of The Nippon Dental University.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacteria; Guided bone regeneration; Membrane; Permeability; dPTFE

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35355145     DOI: 10.1007/s10266-022-00705-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Odontology        ISSN: 1618-1247            Impact factor:   2.885


  48 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Ronald E Jung; Andreas Feloutzis
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 2.  Guided Bone Regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications.

Authors:  Maria Retzepi; N Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 3.  On the repair potential of periodontal tissues.

Authors:  A H Melcher
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 6.993

Review 4.  Current barrier membranes: titanium mesh and other membranes for guided bone regeneration in dental applications.

Authors:  Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia; Yasunori Ayukawa; Akihiro Furuhashi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  J Prosthodont Res       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 4.642

5.  The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering.

Authors:  J R Spray; C G Black; H F Morris; S Ochi
Journal:  Ann Periodontol       Date:  2000-12

6.  The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest.

Authors:  D P Tarnow; S C Cho; S S Wallace
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  Treatment of dehiscences and fenestrations around dental implants using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes associated with bone autografts: a comparative clinical study.

Authors:  M Simion; U Misitano; L Gionso; A Salvato
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  The regenerative potential of the periodontal ligament. An experimental study in the monkey.

Authors:  S Nyman; J Gottlow; T Karring; J Lindhe
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 8.728

Review 9.  Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?

Authors:  Tara L Aghaloo; Peter K Moy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 10.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.