Literature DB >> 12787222

A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients.

Christoph H F Hämmerle1, Ronald E Jung, Andreas Feloutzis.   

Abstract

The aim of the present systematic review was to assess the survival of implants in regenerated bone applying the method of guided bone regeneration (GBR) compared with the survival of implants in non-regenerated bone. Studies to be included in this review needed to provide at least 12-month results following prosthetic reconstruction of titanium implants in bone regenerated by GBR with or without membrane supporting materials. The outcome measures were implant survival described as presence of implant, implant success (according to the criteria in the respective study), absence of clinical implant mobility, absence of implant fracture, absence of progressive peri-implant crestal bone loss as assessed on radiographs without clinical signs of peri-implant infection, absence of peri-implant infection with suppuration. A MEDLINE search and a hand search of relevant scientific journals were conducted including studies from the year 1990 to May 2001. A total of 11 studies could be identified fulfilling the inclusion criteria. All studies except two had the characteristics of case series or cross-sectional surveys. The two different studies had both test and control implants included in their analysis and qualified as controlled clinical trials. Cumulative success or survival rates, respectively, for implants in regenerated bone ranged from 100% after 5 years to 79.4% after 5 years of function. Regarding survival data, no significant differences were found in the controlled clinical trials between implants in regenerated compared to implants in non-regenerated bone. Within the limits of this systematic review characterized by second and third levels of evidence, the following conclusions can be drawn: The survival rate of implants placed into sites with regenerated/augmented bone using barrier membranes varied between 79% and 100% with the majority of studies indicating more than 90% after at least one year of function. The survival rates obtained in the present systematic review are similar to those generally reported for implants placed conventionally into sites without the need for bone augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12787222     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.29.s3.14.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  40 in total

1.  Bone regeneration in dentistry.

Authors:  Paolo Tonelli; Marco Duvina; Luigi Barbato; Eleonora Biondi; Niccolò Nuti; Leila Brancato; Giovanna Delle Rose
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2011-09

2.  Electrical mallet provides essential advantages in split-crest and immediate implant placement.

Authors:  Roberto Crespi; Paolo Capparè; Enrico Felice Gherlone
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01-18

3.  Management of the exposure of a dense PTFE (d-PTFE) membrane in guided bone regeneration (GBR): a case report.

Authors:  P Ghensi; W Stablum; E Bettio; M C Soldini; T R Tripi; C Soldini
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2017-11-30

4.  Wound models for periodontal and bone regeneration: the role of biologic research.

Authors:  Anton Sculean; Iain L C Chapple; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 7.589

5.  Effect of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell in peri-implant bone defect after immediate implant: an experiment study in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Peng-Jie Hao; Zhi-Guo Wang; Quan-Chen Xu; Sheng Xu; Zhuo-Ri Li; Pi-Shan Yang; Zhong-Hao Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-11-15

6.  Effect of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell in peri-implant bone defect after immediate implant: an experiment study in beagle dogs.

Authors:  Peng-Jie Hao; Zhi-Guo Wang; Quan-Chen Xu; Sheng Xu; Zhuo-Ri Li; Pi-Shan Yang; Zhong-Hao Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2014-10-15

7.  Micro-computed tomography analysis of early stage bone healing using micro-porous titanium mesh for guided bone regeneration: preliminary experiment in a canine model.

Authors:  Yunia Dwi Rakhmatia; Yasunori Ayukawa; Yohei Jinno; Akihiro Furuhashi; Kiyoshi Koyano
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.634

8.  Clinical evaluation of a collagen matrix to enhance the width of keratinized gingiva around dental implants.

Authors:  Kang-Ho Lee; Byung-Ock Kim; Hyun-Seon Jang
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 2.614

9.  Guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement using bovine-derived xenograft with and without liquid platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Gözde Işık; Meltem Özden Yüce; Nazan Koçak-Topbaş; Tayfun Günbay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.573

10.  Tetracycline impregnation affects degradation of porcine collagen matrix in healthy and diabetic rats.

Authors:  Haim Tal; Miron Weinreb; Asaf Shely; Carlos E Nemcovsky; Ofer Moses
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.