Literature DB >> 35353174

Opportunity loss: care team job satisfaction and urgent care, emergency department, and hospital costs for patients with cardiovascular disease.

Marlon P Mundt1,2, Larissa I Zakletskaia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the association between primary care team job satisfaction and urgent care, emergency department, and hospital costs for their patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). STUDY
DESIGN: Electronic health record (EHR)-extracted observational study alongside a cross-sectional health care professional survey.
METHODS: A total of 143 health professionals, including physicians and clinical staff, at 5 US primary care clinics participated in a cross-sectional survey about job satisfaction. Urgent care visits, emergency department visits, hospital visit days, and medical costs in the past 12 months for each care team's panel of patients were extracted from the EHR. Three-level hierarchical modelling evaluated the link between team job satisfaction, urgent care visits, emergency department visits, hospital visit days, and medical care costs in the past 12 months for the team's patients with diagnosed CVD.
RESULTS: Teams with higher satisfaction with their freedom of work methods, work hours, and income were associated with fewer hospital days (odds ratio = 0.85, 0.72, and 0.81, respectively) and lower medical care costs -$474, -$650, and -$397 per patient, respectively) for their patients with CVD. Overall job satisfaction was not significantly associated with cost of care.
CONCLUSIONS: Health care employee job satisfaction in primary care is an important factor to consider in efforts to lower medical costs for patients with CVD.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiovascular disease; cost-effectiveness; health economics; job satisfaction; primary care; workforce

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35353174      PMCID: PMC9508867          DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmac023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.290


  21 in total

1.  Features of primary health care teams associated with successful quality improvement of diabetes care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  K Stevenson; R Baker; A Farooqi; R Sorrie; K Khunti
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.267

2.  Huddle up!: The adoption and use of structured team communication for VA medical home implementation.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Lisa S Meredith; Alison B Hamilton; Elizabeth M Yano; Lisa V Rubenstein
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

3.  Effects of primary care team social networks on quality of care and costs for patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Marlon P Mundt; Valerie J Gilchrist; Michael F Fleming; Larissa I Zakletskaia; Wen-Jan Tuan; John W Beasley
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

5.  Joy In Medical Practice: Clinician Satisfaction In The Healthy Work Place Trial.

Authors:  Mark Linzer; Christine A Sinsky; Sara Poplau; Roger Brown; Eric Williams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Elements of team-based care in a patient-centered medical home are associated with lower burnout among VA primary care employees.

Authors:  Christian D Helfrich; Emily D Dolan; Joseph Simonetti; Robert J Reid; Sandra Joos; Bonnie J Wakefield; Gordon Schectman; Richard Stark; Stephan D Fihn; Henry B Harvey; Karin Nelson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The value of adding a verbal report to written handoffs on early readmission following prolonged respiratory failure.

Authors:  Dean R Hess; Arthur Tokarczyk; Mary O'Malley; Susan Gavaghan; Judith Sullivan; Ulrich Schmidt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction?

Authors:  J S Haas; E F Cook; A L Puopolo; H R Burstin; P D Cleary; T A Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study.

Authors:  S M Campbell; M Hann; J Hacker; C Burns; D Oliver; A Thapar; N Mead; D G Safran; M O Roland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-06

10.  Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  P E Bogden; R D Abbott; P Williamson; J K Onopa; L M Koontz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.