Literature DB >> 35352300

On the usefulness of graph-theoretic properties in the study of perceived numerosity.

Martin Guest1, Michele Zito1, Johan Hulleman2, Marco Bertamini3,4.   

Abstract

Observers can quickly estimate the quantity of sets of visual elements. Many aspects of this ability have been studied and the underlying system has been called the Approximate Number Sense (Dehaene, 2011). Specific visual properties, such as size and clustering of the elements, can bias an estimate. For intermediate numerical quantities at low density (above five, but before texturization), human performance is predicted by a model based on the region of influence of elements (occupancy model: Allïk & Tuulmets, 1991). For random 2D configurations we computed ten indices based on graph theory, and we compared them with the occupancy model: independence number, domination, connected components, local clustering coefficient, global clustering coefficient, random walk, eigenvector centrality, maximum clique, total degree of connectivity, and total edge length. We made comparisons across a range of parameters, and we varied the size of the region of influence around each element. The analysis of the pattern of correlations suggests two main groups of graph-based measures. The first group is sensitive to the presence of local clustering of elements, the second seems more sensitive to density and the way information spreads in graphs. Empirical work on perception of numerosity may benefit from comparing, or controlling for, these properties.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Graph theory; Numerosity; Occupancy model; Principal component analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35352300      PMCID: PMC9579069          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01733-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  34 in total

1.  Calibrating the mental number line.

Authors:  Véronique Izard; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-08-02

2.  The effect of clustering on perceived quantity in humans (Homo sapiens) and in chicks (Gallus gallus).

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Martin Guest; Giorgio Vallortigara; Rosa Rugani; Lucia Regolin
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Effect of item arrangement on perceived numerosity: randomness vs regularity.

Authors:  N Ginsburg
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

4.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli.

Authors:  Titia Gebuis; Bert Reynvoet
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-12

5.  Network centrality analysis of eye-gaze data in autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Mehrshad Sadria; Soroush Karimi; Anita T Layton
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.589

6.  Clustering leads to underestimation of numerosity, but crowding is not the cause.

Authors:  Ramakrishna Chakravarthi; Marco Bertamini
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2020-01-28

7.  The regular-random numerosity illusion: rectangular patterns.

Authors:  N Ginsburg
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1980-10

8.  Sometimes area counts more than number.

Authors:  Felicia Hurewitz; Rochel Gelman; Brian Schnitzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Grouping by proximity and the visual impression of approximate number in random dot arrays.

Authors:  Hee Yeon Im; Sheng-Hua Zhong; Justin Halberda
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Mechanisms for perception of numerosity or texture-density are governed by crowding-like effects.

Authors:  Giovanni Anobile; Marco Turi; Guido Marco Cicchini; David C Burr
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.