| Literature DB >> 35351005 |
Junfeng Huang1, Fang Yuan1, Ming Zhou1, Tianyue Huang1, Yanjun Zhang1, Qiong Liang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Bletilla genus of Orchidaceae includes plants with great economic value, among which B. striata is the main traditional medicinal plant, and its pseudobulb, known as BaiJi, was first recorded in Shennong's Classic of Materia Medica. However, there has been little systemic evaluation of the germplasm quality of Bletilla plants in China. In order to comprehensive evaluate the Bletilla resources in China and screen out the candidate phenotypic traits determining yield and/or quality of Bletilla, the variation of phenotypic indicators (pseudobulb, leaf, stem, inflorescence, flower) and active ingredients contents (polysaccharide, total phenolics and militarine) in different populations of B. striata and B. ochracea were investigated through 4 years' common-garden experiment.Entities:
Keywords: Active ingredients; Bletilla; Correlation analysis; Gray relation analysis; Phenotypic traits
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35351005 PMCID: PMC8966332 DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03540-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Fig. 1Geographic distribution of the Bletilla plants collected from China. The 33 populations of Bletilla across ten provinces in China. For location details, see Table S1. This map was drawn by ArcGIS software based on longitude and latitude in population information (Table S1). No. 1–28 are populations of B. striata (in blue), while No. 29–33 are populations of B. ochracea (in red)
Summary of the main statistical parameters in the one-way ANOVA of phenotypic traits and the main active ingredient contents
| Plant height (cm) | 2018 | 5 | 57 | 25.79 | 38.61 | 19.62 | 1.08E-72 | 621 |
| 2019 | 10 | 80 | 29.78 | 28.26 | 27.26 | 2.89E-85 | 482 | |
| 2020 | 13 | 68 | 32.32 | 33.33 | 53.19 | 1.14E-150 | 617 | |
| Leaf blade length (cm) | 2018 | 7 | 55 | 29.79 | 24.99 | 15.99 | 1.61E-60 | 621 |
| 2019 | 10 | 54 | 30.02 | 24.16 | 31.67 | 7.39E-95 | 482 | |
| 2020 | 10 | 64 | 30.21 | 27.71 | 33.28 | 3.67E-110 | 617 | |
| Leaf blade width (cm) | 2018 | 1.0 | 12.5 | 4.51 | 40.00 | 22.83 | 2.15E-82 | 617 |
| 2019 | 2.0 | 9.5 | 4.85 | 28.99 | 26.51 | 1.49E-83 | 482 | |
| 2020 | 2.0 | 11.5 | 5.16 | 27.66 | 23.13 | 2.84E-83 | 617 | |
| Leaf number | 2018 | 1 | 6 | 3.69 | 19.79 | 5.87 | 3.49E-20 | 621 |
| 2019 | 2 | 8 | 4.30 | 23.41 | 11.51 | 6.83E-41 | 482 | |
| 2020 | 2 | 43 | 4.01 | 43.04 | 1.53 | 3.26E-02 | 617 | |
| Stem diameter (mm) | 2018 | 0.33 | 9.86 | 5.31 | 33.84 | 15.69 | 1.75E-59 | 621 |
| 2019 | 2.13 | 11.36 | 5.44 | 26.19 | 32.96 | 1.72E-97 | 482 | |
| 2020 | 2.08 | 9.85 | 5.75 | 23.05 | 21.41 | 4.17E-78 | 617 | |
| Inflorescence height (cm) | 2018 | 15 | 71 | 39.83 | 29.67 | 13.65 | 1.35E-38 | 326 |
| 2019 | 10 | 89 | 32.11 | 35.96 | 37.76 | 2.58E-105 | 470 | |
| 2020 | 19 | 83 | 40.35 | 27.98 | 37.33 | 2.05E-119 | 616 | |
| Inflorescence length (cm) | 2018 | 11 | 63 | 32.08 | 33.57 | 13.69 | 9.76E-39 | 327 |
| 2019 | 10 | 69 | 30.27 | 30.51 | 31.96 | 2.81E-94 | 470 | |
| 2020 | 12 | 58 | 32.51 | 28.55 | 33.26 | 4.91E-110 | 616 | |
| Flower number | 2018 | 3 | 17 | 9.00 | 33.27 | 5.19 | 6.49E-14 | 325 |
| 2019 | 1 | 14 | 5.85 | 46.54 | 26.98 | 1.49E-83 | 469 | |
| 2020 | 3 | 17 | 8.83 | 25.70 | 20.16 | 5.61E-74 | 611 | |
| Fruit number | 2018 | 1 | 9 | 2.60 | 51.26 | 1.47 | 6.85E-02 | 244 |
| 2019 | 1 | 5 | 1.47 | 47.06 | 3.70 | 5.89E-09 | 280 | |
| 2020 | 3 | 3 | 1.49 | 50.59 | 7.46 | 1.14E-20 | 263 | |
| Weight of pseudobulb (g) | 2017 | 1.4 | 111.0 | 34.27 | 69.55 | 38.75 | 1.23E-93 | 370 |
| 2018 | 3.2 | 281.1 | 81.92 | 66.25 | 12.05 | 1.37E-05 | 278 | |
| 2019 | 6.7 | 725.0 | 138.97 | 72.34 | 13.21 | 2.55E-22 | 286 | |
| 2020 | 5.8 | 597.0 | 185.32 | 71.06 | 14.28 | 5.29E-89 | 270 | |
| Polysaccharide content (%) | 2017 | 18.36 | 59.38 | 45.03 | 18.92 | 604.53 | 0.00E + 00 | 99 |
| 2018 | 15.36 | 60.00 | 45.66 | 18.68 | 740.31 | 0.00E + 00 | 99 | |
| 2019 | 12.37 | 59.60 | 46.94 | 21.03 | 880.41 | 1.37E-34 | 99 | |
| 2020 | 8.34 | 55.31 | 42.84 | 27.16 | 2343.25 | 3.01E-02 | 99 | |
| Total phenol content (%) | 2017 | 1.57 | 4.84 | 3.73 | 21.00 | 481.12 | 3.84E-05 | 99 |
| 2018 | 1.36 | 5.07 | 3.63 | 22.61 | 427.51 | 1.42E-33 | 99 | |
| 2019 | 0.84 | 4.97 | 3.77 | 23.47 | 334.64 | 0.00E + 00 | 99 | |
| 2020 | 1.21 | 5.01 | 3.42 | 29.48 | 312.33 | 0.00E + 00 | 99 | |
| Militerane content (%) | 2017 | 0.45 | 3.99 | 1.44 | 46.62 | 602.31 | 6.51E-38 | 99 |
| 2018 | 0.51 | 3.68 | 1.43 | 45.93 | 670.60 | 2.38E-01 | 99 | |
| 2019 | 0.55 | 3.11 | 1.51 | 40.05 | 469.44 | 1.67E-02 | 99 | |
| 2020 | 0.69 | 4.29 | 1.60 | 44.19 | 284.97 | 7.44E-38 | 99 |
Min and Max the minimum value and maximum value in the sample; Mean, the average value of the sample, CV (%) coefficient of variation; F, ratio of MSA/MSE, P P value; n, sample size
Fig. 2Summary of morphological measurements, pseudobulb weight and main active ingredient content of B. striata and B. ochracea. Comparison of morphological measurements (a), pseudobulb weight (b) and the main active ingredient contents (c) in different growth stages and different species of B. striata and B. ochracea. Values are the mean ± SD (standard deviation), and different lowercase letters indicate significant differences with the parameter of P < 0.05
The fresh weight of pseudobulbs of 28 populations of B. striata and 5 populations of B. ochracea
No. 1–28 are B. striata, No. 29–33 are B. ochracea. Red represents the top five populations of pseudobulb weight in different years, while green represents the last five populations. Values represent the mean ± SD of ten individuals, and different lowercase letters with superscripts indicate significant differences between populations with the parameter of P < 0.05
Active ingredient contents of 28 populations of B. striata and 5 populations of B. ochracea
No. 1–28 are B. striata, No. 29–33 are B. ochracea. Red represents the top five populations in terms of active ingredient contents in different years, while green represents the last five populations. Values represent the mean ± SD of three biological replicates, and different lowercases letters with superscript indicate significant differences between populations with the parameter of P < 0.05
Correlation degree and rank of pseudobulb weight and main active ingredient contents based on gray relational analysis
| Population code | Correlation degree | Relative correlation | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HNSZ | 0.721 | 0.432 | 0.625 | 1 |
| AHBZ | 0.683 | 0.434 | 0.611 | 2 |
| HBLT | 0.676 | 0.471 | 0.589 | 3 |
| HBSN | 0.631 | 0.452 | 0.583 | 4 |
| JSNJ | 0.628 | 0.465 | 0.574 | 5 |
| GXHZ | 0.635 | 0.501 | 0.559 | 6 |
| HBWH | 0.611 | 0.483 | 0.558 | 7 |
| SCLS ( | 0.607 | 0.485 | 0.556 | 8 |
| HBXG | 0.649 | 0.525 | 0.553 | 9 |
| HBYL | 0.639 | 0.532 | 0.545 | 10 |
| SCWY | 0.608 | 0.508 | 0.545 | 11 |
| GZZY | 0.566 | 0.505 | 0.528 | 12 |
| HBXS | 0.577 | 0.522 | 0.525 | 13 |
| SXZP ( | 0.595 | 0.558 | 0.516 | 14 |
| HNLS | 0.552 | 0.538 | 0.506 | 15 |
| HBLC | 0.528 | 0.518 | 0.505 | 16 |
| HBHF | 0.571 | 0.568 | 0.501 | 17 |
| HBWF ( | 0.574 | 0.575 | 0.500 | 18 |
| XSSC | 0.525 | 0.533 | 0.496 | 19 |
| YCWZ | 0.488 | 0.531 | 0.479 | 20 |
| HBMC | 0.531 | 0.590 | 0.474 | 21 |
| HNLS ( | 0.501 | 0.571 | 0.467 | 22 |
| SCLS | 0.515 | 0.597 | 0.463 | 23 |
| HBXE | 0.476 | 0.593 | 0.445 | 24 |
| HNSZ ( | 0.467 | 0.599 | 0.438 | 25 |
| HNCL | 0.494 | 0.652 | 0.431 | 26 |
| HBJS | 0.451 | 0.612 | 0.424 | 27 |
| HBSY | 0.445 | 0.633 | 0.413 | 28 |
| SXXX | 0.446 | 0.655 | 0.405 | 29 |
| SYZS | 0.438 | 0.646 | 0.404 | 30 |
| GXLY | 0.440 | 0.665 | 0.398 | 31 |
| HBJM | 0.406 | 0.694 | 0.369 | 32 |
| YNBS | 0.409 | 0.757 | 0.351 | 33 |
The populations of unmarked species are B. striata
Fig. 3Correlation analysis of phenotypic traits, pseudobulb weight and active ingredient contents. Correlation analysis of phenotypic traits, pseudobulb weight and main active ingredient contents in 2018 (a), 2019 (b) and 2020 (c) was carried out. Values are Pearson correlation coefficients, which are used to construct the heat map. * or ** represent a significant difference with the parameters of P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively