| Literature DB >> 35349686 |
Yi-Ye Liang1,2, Xue-Yan Chen1,2, Biao-Feng Zhou1,2, Thomas Mitchell-Olds3, Baosheng Wang1,4.
Abstract
The strength of selection varies among populations and across the genome, but the determinants of efficacy of selection remain unclear. In this study, we used whole-genome sequencing data from 467 Boechera stricta accessions to quantify the strength of selection and characterize the pattern of local adaptation. We found low genetic diversity on 0-fold degenerate sites and conserved non-coding sites, indicating functional constraints on these regions. The estimated distribution of fitness effects and the proportion of fixed substitutions suggest relaxed negative and positive selection in B. stricta. Among the four population groups, the NOR and WES groups have smaller effective population size (Ne), higher proportions of effectively neutral sites, and lower rates of adaptive evolution compared with UTA and COL groups, reflecting the effect of Ne on the efficacy of natural selection. We also found weaker selection on GC-biased sites compared with GC-conservative (unbiased) sites, suggested that GC-biased gene conversion has affected the strength of selection in B. stricta. We found mixed evidence for the role of the recombination rate on the efficacy of selection. The positive and negative selection was stronger in high-recombination regions compared with low-recombination regions in COL but not in other groups. By scanning the genome, we found different subsets of selected genes suggesting differential adaptation among B. stricta groups. These results show that differences in effective population size, nucleotide composition, and recombination rate are important determinants of the efficacy of selection. This study enriches our understanding of the roles of natural selection and local adaptation in shaping genomic variation.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Boecherazzm321990 ; GC-biased gene conversion; adaptive evolution; conserved non-coding region; distribution of fitness effects; effective population size
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35349686 PMCID: PMC9011030 DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evac043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genome Biol Evol ISSN: 1759-6653 Impact factor: 4.065
Fig. 1.Nucleotide diversity (π) at each category of sites in four genetic groups of Boechera stricta. In these box plots, the median is shown by a horizontal line, while the bottom and top of each box represents the first and third quartiles. The whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range. Outliers are not shown in the plot. Different letters (a–d) above each box indicate significant differences among groups based on Mann–Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.05). IntronC, middle region after excluding the first and last 30 bp of each intron; IntronM, the first and last 30 bp of each intron; CNS, conserved non-coding sequence.
Fig. 2.Negative and positive selection in the Boechera stricta genome. (A) Comparisons of the DFE among B. stricta groups at 0-fold sites. (B) The proportion of adaptive substitutions (α), and (C) the rate of adaptive substitution (ω) of 0-fold sites in each group. Different letters (a–d) above each bar indicate significant differences among groups based on Mann–Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3.Effects of gBGC on the efficacy of selection in four Boechera stricta groups. Four statistics and 95% confidence intervals (indicated by error bar) were estimated for different mutation categories: WS (ancestral allele A or T, derived allele G or C; A/T → G/C), SW (ancestral allele G or C, derived allele A or T; G/C → A/T), and WW + SS (ancestral and derived allele are both G or C or both A or T; A/T → A/T; and GC → GC). (A) The proportion of effectively neutral sites (N < 1). (B) The proportion of strongly deleterious mutations (N > 10). (C) The proportion of adaptive substitution (α). (D) The rate of adaptive substitution (ω). Different letters (a–d) above each bar indicate significant differences among groups based on Mann–Whitney U tests with Bonferroni correction (P < 0.05).
Fig. 4.Signatures of positive selection in Boechera stricta. (A) Manhattan plot of CLR values estimated in each group. (B) Number of group-specific and group-shared genes located in swept regions. (C) Manhattan plot of absolute values of iHS. (D) Number of group-specific and group-shared candidate genes identified by iHS. In A and C, alternative colors paint the different chromosomes, and dashed horizontal lines mark the significance threshold (FDR < 0.01).