Literature DB >> 21059791

Positive and negative selection on noncoding DNA close to protein-coding genes in wild house mice.

Athanasios Kousathanas1, Fiona Oliver, Daniel L Halligan, Peter D Keightley.   

Abstract

During the past two decades, evidence has accumulated of adaptive evolution within protein-coding genes in a variety of species. However, with the exception of Drosophila and humans, little is known about the extent of adaptive evolution in noncoding DNA. Here, we study regions upstream and downstream of protein-coding genes in the house mouse Mus musculus castaneus, a species that has a much larger effective population size (N(e)) than humans. We analyze polymorphism data for 78 genes from 15 wild-caught M. m. castaneus individuals and divergence to a closely related species, Mus famulus. We find high levels of nucleotide diversity and moderate levels of selective constraint in upstream and downstream regions compared with nonsynonymous sites of protein-coding genes. From the polymorphism data, we estimate the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of new mutations and infer that most new mutations in upstream and downstream regions behave as effectively neutral and that only a small fraction is strongly negatively selected. We also estimate the fraction of substitutions that have been driven to fixation by positive selection (α) and the ratio of adaptive to neutral divergence (ω(α)). We find that α for upstream and downstream regions (∼ 10%) is much lower than α for nonsynonymous sites (∼ 50%). However, ω(α) estimates are very similar for nonsynonymous sites (∼ 10%) and upstream and downstream regions (∼ 5%). We conclude that negative selection operating in upstream and downstream regions of M. m. castaneus is weak and that the low values of α for upstream and downstream regions relative to nonsynonymous sites are most likely due to the presence of a higher proportion of neutrally evolving sites and not due to lower absolute rates of adaptive substitution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21059791     DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq299

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  20 in total

1.  Estimating the rate of adaptive molecular evolution when the evolutionary divergence between species is small.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Association mapping reveals the role of purifying selection in the maintenance of genomic variation in gene expression.

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; Young Wha Lee; John R Stinchcombe; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast.

Authors:  Yuan O Zhu; Mark L Siegal; David W Hall; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Disproportionate roles for the X chromosome and proteins in adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Methods to detect selection on noncoding DNA.

Authors:  Ying Zhen; Peter Andolfatto
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

6.  A comparison of models to infer the distribution of fitness effects of new mutations.

Authors:  Athanasios Kousathanas; Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Rates and fitness consequences of new mutations in humans.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  The Counteracting Effects of Demography on Functional Genomic Variation: The Roma Paradigm.

Authors:  Neus Font-Porterias; Rocio Caro-Consuegra; Marcel Lucas-Sánchez; Marie Lopez; Aaron Giménez; Annabel Carballo-Mesa; Elena Bosch; Francesc Calafell; Lluís Quintana-Murci; David Comas
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Major role of positive selection in the evolution of conservative segments of Drosophila proteins.

Authors:  Georgii A Bazykin; Alexey S Kondrashov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Variation in base-substitution mutation in experimental and natural lineages of Caenorhabditis nematodes.

Authors:  Dee R Denver; Larry J Wilhelm; Dana K Howe; Kristin Gafner; Peter C Dolan; Charles F Baer
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.