Literature DB >> 35349430

Finding the Spatial Co-Variation of Brain Deformation With Principal Component Analysis.

Xianghao Zhan, Yuzhe Liu, Nicholas J Cecchi, Olivier Gevaert, Michael M Zeineh, Gerald A Grant, David B Camarillo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Strain and strain rate are effective traumatic brain injury metrics. In finite element (FE) head model, thousands of elements were used to represent the spatial distribution of these metrics. Owing that these metrics are resulted from brain inertia, their spatial distribution can be represented in more concise pattern. Since head kinematic features and brain deformation vary largely across head impact types (Zhan et al., 2021), we applied principal component analysis (PCA) to find the spatial co-variation of injury metrics (maximum principal strain (MPS), MPS rate (MPSR) and MPS × MPSR) in four impact types: simulation, football, mixed martial arts and car crashes, and used the PCA to find patterns in these metrics and improve the machine learning head model (MLHM).
METHODS: We applied PCA to decompose the injury metrics for all impacts in each impact type, and investigate the spatial co-variation using the first principal component (PC1). Furthermore, we developed a MLHM to predict PC1 and then inverse-transform to predict for all brain elements. The accuracy, the model complexity and the size of training dataset of PCA-MLHM are compared with previous MLHM (Zhan et al., 2021).
RESULTS: PC1 explained variance on the datasets. Based on PC1 coefficients, the corpus callosum and midbrain exhibit high variance on all datasets. Finally, the PCA-MLHM reduced model parameters by 74% with a similar MPS estimation accuracy.
CONCLUSION: The brain injury metric in a dataset can be decomposed into mean components and PC1 with high explained variance. SIGNIFICANCE: The spatial co-variation analysis enables better interpretation of the patterns in brain injury metrics. It also improves the efficiency of MLHM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35349430      PMCID: PMC9580615          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2022.3163230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.756


  55 in total

1.  Dynamic response of the brain with vasculature: a three-dimensional computational study.

Authors:  Johnson Ho; Svein Kleiven
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Maximum principal strain and strain rate associated with concussion diagnosis correlates with changes in corpus callosum white matter indices.

Authors:  Thomas W McAllister; James C Ford; Songbai Ji; Jonathan G Beckwith; Laura A Flashman; Keith Paulsen; Richard M Greenwald
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 3.934

3.  Mechanistic Insights into Human Brain Impact Dynamics through Modal Analysis.

Authors:  Kaveh Laksari; Mehmet Kurt; Hessam Babaee; Svein Kleiven; David Camarillo
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 9.161

4.  Comparing Region of Interest versus Voxel-Wise Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analytic Methods in Mild and Moderate Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Liane E Hunter; Naomi Lubin; Nancy R Glassman; Xiaonan Xue; Moshe Spira; Michael L Lipton
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 5.269

5.  Time Window of Head Impact Kinematics Measurement for Calculation of Brain Strain and Strain Rate in American Football.

Authors:  Yuzhe Liu; August G Domel; Nicholas J Cecchi; Eli Rice; Ashlyn A Callan; Samuel J Raymond; Zhou Zhou; Xianghao Zhan; Yiheng Li; Michael M Zeineh; Gerald A Grant; David B Camarillo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.934

6.  Instantaneous Whole-Brain Strain Estimation in Dynamic Head Impact.

Authors:  Kianoosh Ghazi; Shaoju Wu; Wei Zhao; Songbai Ji
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 5.269

7.  Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions.

Authors:  Svein Kleiven
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2007-10

8.  The relationship between brain injury criteria and brain strain across different types of head impacts can be different.

Authors:  Xianghao Zhan; Yiheng Li; Yuzhe Liu; August G Domel; Hossein Vahid Alizadeh; Samuel J Raymond; Jesse Ruan; Saeed Barbat; Stephen Tiernan; Olivier Gevaert; Michael M Zeineh; Gerald A Grant; David B Camarillo
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.293

9.  An anatomically detailed and personalizable head injury model: Significance of brain and white matter tract morphological variability on strain.

Authors:  Xiaogai Li; Zhou Zhou; Svein Kleiven
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2020-10-10

10.  Development of head injury assessment reference values based on NASA injury modeling.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Somers; Bradley Granderson; John W Melvin; Ala Tabiei; Charles Lawrence; Alan Feiveson; Michael Gernhardt; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; John Patalak
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2011-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Piecewise Multivariate Linearity Between Kinematic Features and Cumulative Strain Damage Measure (CSDM) Across Different Types of Head Impacts.

Authors:  Xianghao Zhan; Yiheng Li; Yuzhe Liu; Nicholas J Cecchi; Olivier Gevaert; Michael M Zeineh; Gerald A Grant; David B Camarillo
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 4.219

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.