| Literature DB >> 22160786 |
C Hendricks Brown1, Sheppard G Kellam, Sheila Kaupert, Bengt O Muthén, Wei Wang, Linda K Muthén, Patricia Chamberlain, Craig L PoVey, Rick Cady, Thomas W Valente, Mitsunori Ogihara, Guillermo J Prado, Hilda M Pantin, Carlos G Gallo, José Szapocznik, Sara J Czaja, John W McManus.
Abstract
What progress prevention research has made comes through strategic partnerships with communities and institutions that host this research, as well as professional and practice networks that facilitate the diffusion of knowledge about prevention. We discuss partnership issues related to the design, analysis, and implementation of prevention research and especially how rigorous designs, including random assignment, get resolved through a partnership between community stakeholders, institutions, and researchers. These partnerships shape not only study design, but they determine the data that can be collected and how results and new methods are disseminated. We also examine a second type of partnership to improve the implementation of effective prevention programs into practice. We draw on social networks to studying partnership formation and function. The experience of the Prevention Science and Methodology Group, which itself is a networked partnership between scientists and methodologists, is highlighted.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22160786 PMCID: PMC3398691 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-011-0387-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health ISSN: 0894-587X