| Literature DB >> 35348303 |
Yuya Shirai1, Akiyoshi Nakayama2, Yusuke Kawamura2, Yu Toyoda2, Masahiro Nakatochi3, Seiko Shimizu2, Nariyoshi Shinomiya2, Yukinori Okada4, Hirotaka Matsuo2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The effects of coffee consumption on serum uric acid (SUA) levels and gout risk are controversial. There have hitherto been no reports based on Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis of its effects that consider pleiotropy. Here, we evaluated the effects of coffee consumption across ancestry populations, taking pleiotropy into account.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35348303 PMCID: PMC9190218 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACR Open Rheumatol ISSN: 2578-5745
Figure 1Forest plots describing MR effect size for individual SNPs in the Japanese population. Effect size estimates for coffee consumption on (a) gout or (b) uric acid levels are plotted with 95% confidence intervals for individual SNPs (black) and inverse variance‐weighted analysis (red). The vertical dotted line indicates an effect size estimate of 0. The individual SNPs and the mapped genes are labeled on the left. Coffee‐associated genes common to Europeans and Japanese are underlined. IVW, inverse variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism.
Mendelian randomization analyses results inferring causality between coffee consumption and gout or SUA levels
| Exposure | Outcome | No. of instruments | Method | β | SE | OR [95% CI] |
| Heterogeneity | Pleiotropy | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Population | Cochran's Q | Intercept | ||||||||
| Japanese | Coffee | Gout | 10 | IVW (fixed‐effect) | −1.25 | 0.08 | 0.29 [0.24‐0.34] | 2.5 × 10−49 | 5.5 × 10−19 | — |
| IVW (random‐effect) | −1.25 | 0.29 | 0.29 [0.16‐0.51] | 1.9 × 10−5 | — | |||||
| MR‐Egger | −1.76 | 0.48 | 0.17 [0.07‐0.44] | 6.1 × 10−3 | 1.4 × 10−15 | 0.22 | ||||
| Weighted‐median | −1.40 | 0.33 | 0.25 [0.13‐0.47] | 2.7 × 10−5 | — | — | ||||
| Weighted‐mode | −1.85 | 0.19 | 0.16 [0.11‐0.23] | 3.8 × 10−6 | — | — | ||||
| Coffee | Gout | 7 | IVW (fixed‐effect) | −0.29 | 0.13 | 0.75 [0.58‐0.97] | 0.026 | 0.39 | — | |
| IVW (random‐effect) | −0.29 | 0.13 | 0.75 [0.58‐0.97] | 0.030 | — | |||||
| MR‐Egger | −0.34 | 0.30 | 0.71 [0.39‐1.28] | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.84 | ||||
| Weighted‐median | −0.27 | 0.16 | 0.77 [0.57‐1.04] | 0.086 | — | — | ||||
| Weighted‐mode | −0.28 | 0.16 | 0.76 [0.55‐1.04] | 0.14 | — | — | ||||
| Coffee | SUA levels | 9 | IVW (fixed‐effect) | −0.080 | 0.014 | 0.92 [0.9‐0.95] | 9.6 × 10−9 | 2.0 × 10−16 | — | |
| IVW (random‐effect) | −0.080 | 0.047 | 0.92 [0.84‐1.01] | 0.090 | — | |||||
| MR‐Egger | 8.0 × 10−4 | 0.11 | 1.00 [0.81‐1.24] | 0.99 | 2.2 × 10−15 | 0.44 | ||||
| Weighted‐median | −0.022 | 0.020 | 0.98 [0.94‐1.02] | 0.26 | — | — | ||||
| Weighted‐mode | −0.011 | 0.017 | 0.99 [0.96‐1.02] | 0.55 | — | — | ||||
| European | Coffee | Gout | 5 | IVW (fixed‐effect) | −0.58 | 0.21 | 0.56 [0.38‐0.84] | 5.3 × 10−3 | 0.027 | — |
| IVW (random‐effect) | −0.58 | 0.34 | 0.56 [0.29‐1.1] | 0.092 | — | |||||
| MR‐Egger | −0.29 | 0.83 | 0.75 [0.15‐3.8] | 0.75 | 0.016 | 0.72 | ||||
| Weighted‐median | −0.92 | 0.30 | 0.4 [0.22‐0.72] | 2.1 × 10−3 | — | — | ||||
| Weighted‐mode | −0.98 | 0.39 | 0.37 [0.17‐0.8] | 0.065 | — | — | ||||
| Coffee | SUA levels | 5 | IVW (fixed‐effect) | −0.15 | 0.03 | 0.86 [0.8‐0.92] | 7.9 × 10−6 | 6.8 × 10−8 | — | |
| IVW (random‐effect) | −0.15 | 0.11 | 0.86 [0.7‐1.06] | 0.15 | — | |||||
| MR‐Egger | −0.16 | 0.26 | 0.85 [0.51‐1.43] | 0.58 | 1.7 × 10−8 | 0.97 | ||||
| Weighted‐median | −0.03 | 0.05 | 0.97 [0.87‐1.07] | 0.51 | — | — | ||||
| Weighted‐mode | −0.10 | 0.06 | 0.91 [0.81‐1.01] | 0.16 | — | — |
Abbreviations: IVW, inverse variance weighted; MR, Mendelian randomization; OR, odds ratio; SUA, serum uric acid.
After exclusion of the outlier instruments (rs141471965 on ABCG2) in the forest plot.
After additional exclusion of the three instruments suspected to have pleiotropy effects.
IVW (fixed‐effect) analyses were previously performed by Larsson et al (2).
Figure 2Scatter plots describing the association between coffee consumption (exposure) and gout or SUA levels (outcome). Dots represent the coffee‐associated SNPs plotted along with effect size estimates on coffee consumption (x‐axis) and gout or uric acid levels (y‐axis) with 95% confidence intervals (a‐c) in Japanese and (d and e) in Europeans. The line slopes indicate the effect size estimates in four MR analyses using multiple SNPs (ie, inverse variance weighted, MR‐Egger, weighted‐median, and weighted‐mode). Each method is indicated by differently colored lines. Prior to each of the analyses, we removed the outlier instrument (rs141471965 of ABCG2) in panels a and c and removed the three instruments suspected to have pleiotropic effects on gout in panel b. MR, Mendelian randomization; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; SUA, serum uric acid.