Literature DB >> 35348098

Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Oncological Outcomes.

Jessica Lam1, Michael S Tam1, R Luke Retting2, Elisabeth C McLemore2.   

Abstract

The treatment of rectal cancer is complex and involves specialized multidisciplinary care, although the tenet is still rooted in a high-quality total mesorectal excision. The robotic platform is one of many tools in the arsenal to assist dissection in the low pelvis. This article is a comprehensive review of the oncological outcome comparing robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer resection, with a particular focus on total mesorectal excision. There is no statistical difference in total mesorectal grade, circumferential margin, distal margin, and lymph node harvest. Survival data are less mature, but there is also no difference in disease-free or overall survival between the two techniques. Although additional randomized trials are still needed to validate these findings, both techniques are currently acceptable in the minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer, and surgeon preference is paramount to safe and optimal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35348098      PMCID: PMC8782436          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/21.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  37 in total

Review 1.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Alain Valverde; Nicolas Goasguen; Olivier Oberlin; Magali Svrcek; Jean-François Fléjou; Alain Sezeur; Henri Mosnier; Rémi Houdart; Renato M Lupinacci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Annibale D'Annibale; Graziano Pernazza; Igor Monsellato; Vito Pende; Giorgio Lucandri; Paolo Mazzocchi; Giovanni Alfano
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Rectal cancer: the Basingstoke experience of total mesorectal excision, 1978-1997.

Authors:  R J Heald; B J Moran; R D Ryall; R Sexton; J K MacFarlane
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1998-08

6.  Factors associated with noncomplete mesorectal excision following surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ipek Sapci; Jorge Silva Velazco; Xhileta Xhaja; Alexandra Aiello; Emre Gorgun; Luca Stocchi; Conor P Delaney; Scott R Steele; Michael A Valente
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Implementation of a hospital-based quality assessment program for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Ellen McKeown; Arden M Morris; Sandra L Wong; Mary Oerline; Lyndia Poe; Darrell A Campbell; Nancy J Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Short- and medium-term outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic rectal resection.

Authors:  Alberto Patriti; Graziano Ceccarelli; Alberto Bartoli; Alessandro Spaziani; Alessia Biancafarina; Luciano Casciola
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study.

Authors:  Min Soo Cho; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Byung Soh Min; Seung Hyuk Baik; Kang Young Lee; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Effect of the plane of surgery achieved on local recurrence in patients with operable rectal cancer: a prospective study using data from the MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16 randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Phil Quirke; Robert Steele; John Monson; Robert Grieve; Subhash Khanna; Jean Couture; Chris O'Callaghan; Arthur Sun Myint; Eric Bessell; Lindsay C Thompson; Mahesh Parmar; Richard J Stephens; David Sebag-Montefiore
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-03-07       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.