Literature DB >> 35348055

An Intervention to Tag Findings Suspicious for Lung Cancer on Chest Computed Tomography Has Good Sensitivity and Number Needed to Diagnose.

Jennifer R Dusendang1, Lori C Sakoda1, Thomas H Urbania2, Sora Ely3, Todd Osinski2, Ashish Patel3, Lisa J Herrinton1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California implemented an intervention to improve follow-up for pulmonary findings on diagnostic chest computed tomography (CT). The intervention includes tagging CT reports with the prefix "#PUL" followed by a character (0-6 or X) to track specific findings. #PUL5, indicating "suspicious for malignancy," triggers automatic referral for multidisciplinary care review.
METHODS: Among patients who obtained an index chest CT exam from August 2015 to July 2017 without an exam in the previous 2 years, we computed the frequency of lung cancer diagnosis within 120 days of CT in relation to each #PUL tag. For #PUL5, we computed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and number needed to diagnose. We also performed a chart review to assess why some patients diagnosed with lung cancer were not tagged #PUL5.
RESULTS: Of the 39,409 patients with a tagged CT report, 1105 (2.8%) had a new primary lung cancer diagnosis within 120 days. Among the 2255 patients tagged #PUL5, 821 were diagnosed with lung cancer, with a sensitivity of 74% (95% confidence interval, 72%-77%). The positive predictive value was 36% (35%-38%), number needed to diagnosis was 2.7 (2.6-2.9), and specificity and negative predictive values were > 95%. Chart review identified opportunities to improve system defaults and clarify concepts.
CONCLUSION: The intervention performed well but needed improvement. Automating CT reports was simple and generalizable, and enabled reduction of care gaps and system improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 35348055      PMCID: PMC8817905          DOI: 10.7812/TPP/20.155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perm J        ISSN: 1552-5767


  14 in total

1.  Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; John H M Austin; Gordon Gamsu; Christian J Herold; James R Jett; David P Naidich; Edward F Patz; Stephen J Swensen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Guidelines for Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules Detected on CT Images: From the Fleischner Society 2017.

Authors:  Heber MacMahon; David P Naidich; Jin Mo Goo; Kyung Soo Lee; Ann N C Leung; John R Mayo; Atul C Mehta; Yoshiharu Ohno; Charles A Powell; Mathias Prokop; Geoffrey D Rubin; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop; William D Travis; Paul E Van Schil; Alexander A Bankier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Systems-Level Resources for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation in the United States: A National Survey.

Authors:  James Simmons; Michael K Gould; Jonathan Iaccarino; Christopher G Slatore; Renda Soylemez Wiener
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Addition of the Fleischner Society Guidelines to Chest CT Examination Interpretive Reports Improves Adherence to Recommended Follow-up Care for Incidental Pulmonary Nodules.

Authors:  Jennifer S McDonald; Chi Wan Koo; Darin White; Thomas E Hartman; Claire E Bender; Anne-Marie G Sykes
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.173

5.  Standardized Reporting and Management of Suspicious Findings on Chest CT Imaging Is Associated With Improved Lung Cancer Diagnosis in an Observational Study.

Authors:  Thomas H Urbania; Jennifer R Dusendang; Lisa J Herrinton; Stacey Alexeeff; Douglas A Corley; Sora Ely; Ashish Patel; Todd Osinski; Lori C Sakoda
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Lung Cancers Manifesting as Part-Solid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Rowena Yip; Claudia I Henschke; Dong Ming Xu; Kunwei Li; Artit Jirapatnakul; David F Yankelevitz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Resource use and guideline concordance in evaluation of pulmonary nodules for cancer: too much and too little care.

Authors:  Renda Soylemez Wiener; Michael K Gould; Christopher G Slatore; Benjamin G Fincke; Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 9.  Advances in intelligent diagnosis methods for pulmonary ground-glass opacity nodules.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Hailin Wang; Chen Geng; Yakang Dai; Jiansong Ji
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.819

10.  From focal pulmonary pure ground-glass opacity nodule detected by low-dose computed tomography into invasive lung adenocarcinoma: A growth pattern analysis in the elderly.

Authors:  Xin Nie; Lin Li; Juan Huang; Ping Zhang; Hong Shi; Gang Cheng; Yong-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.