Literature DB >> 31093766

XEN implant device versus trabeculectomy, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, in open-angle glaucoma patients.

María Teresa Marcos Parra1, Javier Alejandro Salinas López2, Noelia Soledad López Grau2, Ana María Ceausescu2, Juan José Pérez Santonja2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of the XEN45 implant with that of trabeculectomy (TRAB), either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification (PHACO), in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).
METHODS: Retrospective, single-center and comparative study conducted on OAG patients. Patients were divided into four groups: group 1 (XEN alone); group 2 (XEN+PHACO); group 3 (TRAB alone); group 4 (TRAB+PHACO). For statistical purposes, groups 1 and 2 were combined (XEN implant), while groups 3 and 4 were also combined (TRAB surgery). The main outcome measure was intraocular pressure (IOP).
RESULTS: Ninety-one patients (121 eyes; 65 XEN and 56 TRAB) were included. IOP reduction was - 6.7 (- 10.4 to - 3.0) mmHg, p = 0.0013; - 3.5 (- 5.0 to - 2.0) mmHg, p < 0.0001; - 8.1 (- 10.4 to - 5.9) mmHg, p < 0.0001l; and - 7.3 (- 9.3 to - 5.3) mmHg, p < 0.0001 in the XEN alone, XEN+PHACO, TRAB alone, and TRAB+PHACO, respectively. At month 12, an IOP ≥ 6 and ≤ 16 mm without treatment was achieved by 44 (67.7%) and 43 (76.8%), p = 0.2687 in the XEN implant and the TRAB surgery groups, respectively. The mean number of antiglaucoma medications was significantly reduced in all the study groups (p < 0.0001 each). Needling occurred in 20.0% (13/65) of eyes in the XEN implant group, while hyphema occurred in 30.4% (17/56) of eyes in the TRAB group.
CONCLUSIONS: XEN implant, either alone or in combination with phacoemulsification, significantly reduces both IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications to a similar rate than trabeculectomy, but with a better safety profile.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glaucoma; Intraocular pressure; Open-angle glaucoma; Trabeculectomy; XEN implant

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31093766     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-019-04341-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  25 in total

1.  Multicenter case series of standalone XEN implant vs. combination with phacoemulsification in Turkish patients.

Authors:  Muhsin Eraslan; Altan Atakan Özcan; Volkan Dericioğlu; Emine Çiloğlu
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  [Treatment of secondary glaucoma following intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy with the XEN® gel stent and mitomycin C].

Authors:  Mohammad Seleman Bedar; Ulrich Kellner
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Complications and post-operative interventions in XEN45 gel stent implantation in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bjorn Kaijun Betzler; Sheng Yang Lim; Boon Ang Lim; Vivien Cherng Hui Yip; Bryan Chin Hou Ang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Outcomes of XEN 63 Device at 18-Month Follow-Up in Glaucoma Patients: A Two-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Antonio Maria Fea; Martina Menchini; Alessandro Rossi; Chiara Posarelli; Lorenza Malinverni; Michele Figus
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Does mitomycin-C concentration have any influence on XEN45 gel stent outcomes in a real-world setting?

Authors:  Natalia Monja-Alarcón; Susana Perucho-Martínez; Miriam Buenasmañanas-Maeso; Nicolás Toledano-Fernández
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.535

6.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes with Open Versus Closed Conjunctiva Implantation of the XEN45 Gel Stent.

Authors:  Anna Do; Elyse McGlumphy; Aakriti Shukla; Sonal Dangda; Joel S Schuman; Michael V Boland; Jithin Yohannan; Joseph F Panarelli; E Randy Craven
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-12-13

Review 7.  Standalone XEN45 Gel Stent implantation versus combined XEN45-phacoemulsification in the treatment of open angle glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheng Yang Lim; Bjorn Kaijun Betzler; Leonard Wei Leon Yip; Syril Dorairaj; Bryan Chin Hou Ang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Efficacy and safety of XEN®-Implantation vs. trabeculectomy: Data of a "real-world" setting.

Authors:  Felix Mathias Wagner; Alexander Karl-Georg Schuster; Julia Emmerich; Panagiotis Chronopoulos; Esther Maria Hoffmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  XEN Glaucoma Implant for the Management of Operated Uncontrolled Glaucoma: Results and Complications during a Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Katarzyna Lewczuk; Joanna Konopińska; Joanna Jabłońska; Jacek Rudowicz; Patrycja Laszewicz; Zofia Mariak; Marek Rękas
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Trends in Surgical Glaucoma Treatment in Germany Between 2006 and 2018.

Authors:  Jan Luebke; Daniel Boehringer; Alexandra Anton; Moritz Daniel; Thomas Reinhard; Stefan Lang
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 4.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.