Li-Jung Liang1, Alejandra Casillas2, W T Longstreth3, Lynn PhanVo2, Stefanie D Vassar2, Arleen F Brown2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA. Electronic address: LiangL@ucla.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, University of California, 1100 Glendon Avenue, Suite 850, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA. 3. Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology, University of Washington, 908 Jefferson St, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fish consumption has been associated with better health outcomes. Dietary patterns may vary substantially by neighborhood of residence. However, it is unclear if the benefits of a healthy diet are equivalent in different communities. This study examines associations of fish consumption with stroke incidence and stroke risk factors, and whether these differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 4007 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study who were 65 years or older and recruited between 1989 and 1990 from 4 US communities. Outcomes included fish consumption type (bakes/broiled vs. fried) and frequency, stroke incidence, and stroke risk factors. Multilevel regressions models were used to estimate fish consumption associations with clinical outcomes. Lower NSES was associated with higher consumption of fried fish (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10-1.98) and lower consumption of non-fried fish (0.64, 0.47-0.86). Frequent fried fish (11.9 vs. 9.2 person-years for at least once weekly vs. less than once a month, respectively) and less frequent non-fried fish (17.7 vs. 9.6 person-years for less than once a month vs. at least once weekly, respectively) were independently associated with an increased risk of stroke (p-values < 0.05). However, among those with similar levels of healthy fish consumption, residents with low NSES had less benefit on stroke risk reduction, compared with high NSES. CONCLUSION: Fish consumption type and frequency both impact stroke risk. Benefits of healthy fish consumption differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Fish consumption has been associated with better health outcomes. Dietary patterns may vary substantially by neighborhood of residence. However, it is unclear if the benefits of a healthy diet are equivalent in different communities. This study examines associations of fish consumption with stroke incidence and stroke risk factors, and whether these differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES). METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 4007 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study who were 65 years or older and recruited between 1989 and 1990 from 4 US communities. Outcomes included fish consumption type (bakes/broiled vs. fried) and frequency, stroke incidence, and stroke risk factors. Multilevel regressions models were used to estimate fish consumption associations with clinical outcomes. Lower NSES was associated with higher consumption of fried fish (aOR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.10-1.98) and lower consumption of non-fried fish (0.64, 0.47-0.86). Frequent fried fish (11.9 vs. 9.2 person-years for at least once weekly vs. less than once a month, respectively) and less frequent non-fried fish (17.7 vs. 9.6 person-years for less than once a month vs. at least once weekly, respectively) were independently associated with an increased risk of stroke (p-values < 0.05). However, among those with similar levels of healthy fish consumption, residents with low NSES had less benefit on stroke risk reduction, compared with high NSES. CONCLUSION: Fish consumption type and frequency both impact stroke risk. Benefits of healthy fish consumption differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status.
Authors: Janas M Harrington; Darren L Dahly; Anthony P Fitzgerald; Mark S Gilthorpe; Ivan J Perry Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: L P Fried; N O Borhani; P Enright; C D Furberg; J M Gardin; R A Kronmal; L H Kuller; T A Manolio; M B Mittelmark; A Newman Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1991-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: D G Ives; A L Fitzpatrick; D E Bild; B M Psaty; L H Kuller; P M Crowley; R G Cruise; S Theroux Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 1995-07 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Lewis B Morgenstern; James D Escobar; Brisa N Sánchez; Rebecca Hughes; Belinda G Zuniga; Nelda Garcia; Lynda D Lisabeth Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 10.422