Literature DB >> 35344796

Appreciative inquiry and the co-creation of an evaluation framework for Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO) implementation: a two-country experience.

Smita Ghosh1, Bruce B Struminger2, Neeta Singla3, Brenna M Roth4, Anil Kumar5, Sunil Anand5, Emmanuel Mtete6, Jacob Lusekelo7, Irene Massawe8, Elizabeth Jarpe-Ratner9, Steven M Seweryn9, Kris Risley9, Patrick K Moonan10, Eve Pinsker9.   

Abstract

Persistent gaps exist in healthcare workers' capacity to address HIV and tuberculosis in Asia and Africa due to constraints in resources and knowledge. Project ECHO (Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes) leverages video-enabled technology to build workforce capacity and promote collaboration through mentorship and case-based learning. To understand current perceptions of ECHO participants and develop a comprehensive evaluation framework for ECHO implementation, we utilized modified appreciative inquiry guided focus group discussions (FGD) in India and Tanzania and called it SCORE (Strengths, Challenges, Opportunities, Results, and Evaluation). Content and thematic analysis of transcripts from FGDs and key-informant interviews triangulated perceptions of diverse stakeholders about ECHO implementation and identified key elements for development of the framework. The perceived strengths (S) were capacity building and establishing communities of practice. The perceived challenges (C) included securing resources, engaging leadership, and building systems for monitoring impact. Improved internet connectivity, addressing logistical challenges, encouraging session interactivity, and having strategic scale-up plans were perceived opportunities (O). Additionally, gathering measurable results (R) led to development of a comprehensive evaluation (E) framework. Contextualizing and facilitating SCORE with qualitative analysis of findings 6-12 months post-ECHO implementation may serve as a best practice to assess mid-course corrections to improve ECHO implementation quality. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appreciative inquiry; Evaluation; HIV; Qualitative research; Strategic planning; Systems thinking; Tuberculosis

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35344796      PMCID: PMC9177619          DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  18 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.

Authors:  M Q Patton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

3.  What is participatory research?

Authors:  A Cornwall; R Jewkes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Appreciative inquiry in medical education.

Authors:  John Sandars; Deborah Murdoch-Eaton
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.650

5.  How best practices are copied, transferred, or translated between health care facilities: A conceptual framework.

Authors:  Gustavo Guzman; Janna Anneke Fitzgerald; Liz Fulop; Kathryn Hayes; Arthur Poropat; Mark Avery; Steve Campbell; Ron Fisher; Rod Gapp; Carmel Herington; Ruth McPhail; Nerina Vecchio
Journal:  Health Care Manage Rev       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

6.  [HIV in Sub-Saharan Africa: Where Are We Today?]

Authors:  Anna Eichenberger; Maja Weisser; Manuel Battegay
Journal:  Praxis (Bern 1994)       Date:  2019-11

7.  Building virtual communities of practice for health.

Authors:  Bruce Struminger; Sanjeev Arora; Sarah Zalud-Cerrato; David Lowrance; Tedd Ellerbrock
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Uncovering the mysteries of inclusion: Empirical and methodological possibilities in participatory evaluation in an international context.

Authors:  Jill Anne Chouinard; Peter Milley
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2017-12-08

Review 9.  Agile, a guiding principle for health care improvement?

Authors:  Sara Tolf; Monica E Nyström; Carol Tishelman; Mats Brommels; Johan Hansson
Journal:  Int J Health Care Qual Assur       Date:  2015

10.  Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.

Authors:  Peter Craig; Paul Dieppe; Sally Macintyre; Susan Michie; Irwin Nazareth; Mark Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2008-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.