Literature DB >> 35344601

The influence of reinforcement schedule on experience-dependent changes in motivation.

Amy R Johnson1, Brooke A Christensen1,2, Shannon J Kelly1, Erin S Calipari1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

The progressive ratio procedure is used across fields to assess motivation for different reinforcers, define the effects of experimental interventions on motivation, and determine experience-dependent changes in motivation. However, less is known about how operant training schedules affect performance on this widely utilized task. Here we designed an experiment to examine the effect of variable ratio versus fixed ratio training schedules of reinforcement on progressive ratio performance while holding other performance variables constant between groups. We found a robust increase in maximum ratio completed between the pretest and posttraining test highlighting a robust training effect on progressive ratio performance. However, it did not matter if the training was under a fixed or variable ratio schedule. Additionally, we show that neither individual rates during training nor extinction responding correlated with maximum ratio achieved during the sessions. Finally, we show that rates during the training sessions do correlate with extinction performance, suggesting that these variables measure a different aspect of performance that does not predict motivation.
© 2022 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fixed ratio; operant; progressive ratio; sucrose; variable ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35344601      PMCID: PMC9090977          DOI: 10.1002/jeab.755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.215


  54 in total

1.  COMPARISON OF FIXED AND VARIABLE-RATIO SCHEDULES OF REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  M D SUBOSKI
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1965-02

Review 2.  Translational Assessment of Reward and Motivational Deficits in Psychiatric Disorders.

Authors:  Andre Der-Avakian; Samuel A Barnes; Athina Markou; Diego A Pizzagalli
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016

3.  Relative response cost determines the sensitivity of instrumental reward seeking to dopamine receptor blockade.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Alisa R Kosheleff; Nigel T Maidment
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 7.853

4.  Self-administration of cocaine on a progressive ratio schedule in rats: dose-response relationship and effect of haloperidol pretreatment.

Authors:  D C Roberts; E A Loh; G Vickers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Revisiting long-access versus short-access cocaine self-administration in rats: intermittent intake promotes addiction symptoms independent of session length.

Authors:  Florence Allain; Anne-Noël Samaha
Journal:  Addict Biol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.280

6.  Ratio and time requirements on operant schedules: effort-related effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions.

Authors:  Susana Mingote; Suzanne M Weber; Keita Ishiwari; Mercè Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Differences in morphine and cocaine reinforcement under fixed and progressive ratio schedules; effects of extinction, reacquisition and schedule design.

Authors:  N Li; S He; C Parrish; J Delich; K Grasing
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.293

Review 8.  Animal models of alcohol's motivational effects.

Authors:  C L Cunningham; T L Fidler; K G Hill
Journal:  Alcohol Res Health       Date:  2000

9.  The Novel Atypical Dopamine Uptake Inhibitor (S)-CE-123 Partially Reverses the Effort-Related Effects of the Dopamine Depleting Agent Tetrabenazine and Increases Progressive Ratio Responding.

Authors:  Renee A Rotolo; Vladimir Dragacevic; Predrag Kalaba; Ernst Urban; Martin Zehl; Alexander Roller; Judith Wackerlig; Thierry Langer; Marco Pistis; Maria Antonietta De Luca; Francesca Caria; Rebecca Schwartz; Rose E Presby; Jen-Hau Yang; Shanna Samels; Merce Correa; Gert Lubec; John D Salamone
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  The VMAT-2 inhibitor tetrabenazine affects effort-related decision making in a progressive ratio/chow feeding choice task: reversal with antidepressant drugs.

Authors:  Patrick A Randall; Christie A Lee; Eric J Nunes; Samantha E Yohn; Victoria Nowak; Bilal Khan; Priya Shah; Saagar Pandit; V Kiran Vemuri; Alex Makriyannis; Younis Baqi; Christa E Müller; Merce Correa; John D Salamone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.