Literature DB >> 15845103

Ratio and time requirements on operant schedules: effort-related effects of nucleus accumbens dopamine depletions.

Susana Mingote1, Suzanne M Weber, Keita Ishiwari, Mercè Correa, John D Salamone.   

Abstract

Accumbens dopamine (DA) depletions produce deficits that are related to the ratio requirement of the operant schedule; however, it is also possible that time without reinforcement is a factor. The present study examined the effects of accumbens DA depletions in rats using variable interval (VI) schedules with additional fixed ratio (FR) requirements. Four VI schedules were used (VI 60/FR 1, VI 120/FR 1, VI 60/FR 10, VI 120/FR 10). Attachment of the additional work requirement increased response rates under control conditions. After surgery, there was no interaction between interval level (i.e. 60 vs. 120 s) and DA depletion, but there was a significant interaction between ratio requirement (i.e. 1 vs. 10) and DA depletion within the first week after surgery. DA depletions substantially impaired performance on the schedules with added FR 10 requirements, an effect that was largely dependent upon a reduction in fast responses (i.e. inter-response times less than 1.0 s). There was little effect of DA depletion on overall responding on VI 60/FR 1 and VI 120/FR 1 schedules. DA depletions also increased the tendency to take long pauses in responding (i.e. > 20.0 s), and this effect was evident across all schedules tested. Thus, accumbens DA depletions interact with work requirements and blunt the rate-enhancing effects of moderate size ratios, and also enhance the tendency to pause. Attachment of ratio requirements to interval schedules is a work-related response cost that provides a challenge to the organism, and DA in nucleus accumbens appears to be necessary for adapting to this challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15845103     DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03972.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Neurosci        ISSN: 0953-816X            Impact factor:   3.386


  48 in total

Review 1.  Reconsidering anhedonia in depression: lessons from translational neuroscience.

Authors:  Michael T Treadway; David H Zald
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-07-11       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of effort-related choice behavior: dopamine, adenosine and beyond.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Merce Correa; Eric J Nunes; Patrick A Randall; Marta Pardo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Calculating utility: preclinical evidence for cost-benefit analysis by mesolimbic dopamine.

Authors:  Paul E M Phillips; Mark E Walton; Thomas C Jhou
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Discrete neurochemical coding of distinguishable motivational processes: insights from nucleus accumbens control of feeding.

Authors:  Brian A Baldo; Ann E Kelley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Effort-related functions of nucleus accumbens dopamine and associated forebrain circuits.

Authors:  J D Salamone; M Correa; A Farrar; S M Mingote
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Forebrain circuitry involved in effort-related choice: Injections of the GABAA agonist muscimol into ventral pallidum alter response allocation in food-seeking behavior.

Authors:  A M Farrar; L Font; M Pereira; S Mingote; J G Bunce; J J Chrobak; J D Salamone
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.590

7.  Differential actions of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D2 antagonism.

Authors:  John D Salamone; Andrew M Farrar; Laura Font; Vatsal Patel; Devra E Schlar; Eric J Nunes; Lyndsey E Collins; Thomas N Sager
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The adenosine A2A antagonist MSX-3 reverses the effort-related effects of dopamine blockade: differential interaction with D1 and D2 family antagonists.

Authors:  Lila T Worden; Mona Shahriari; Andrew M Farrar; Kelly S Sink; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Modeling operant behavior in the Parkinsonian rat.

Authors:  Irene Avila; Mark P Reilly; Federico Sanabria; Diana Posadas-Sánchez; Claudia L Chavez; Nikhil Banerjee; Peter Killeen; Eddie Castañeda
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism reverses the effects of dopamine receptor antagonism on instrumental output and effort-related choice in the rat: implications for studies of psychomotor slowing.

Authors:  Andrew M Farrar; Mariana Pereira; Francisco Velasco; Jörg Hockemeyer; Christa E Müller; John D Salamone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.