Literature DB >> 21348007

[Vaginal birth versus Cesarean section on demand - which mode of delivery is preferred by pregnant women?].

F Hainer1, I Kowalcek.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Cesarean section rate continues to increase across the developed nations since there are still a number possible reasons for this development including medical and non-clinical indications. The aim of this study was to analyse how pregnant women themselves think about Cesarean section and vaginal delivery, and which mode of delivery they prefer.
METHODS: Pregnant women booked for prenatal diagnosis at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck between October 2004 and January 2005 were invited to participate in the study. 534 pregnant women completed a questionnaire on their method of choice for delivery and selected background variables. RESULT: Women favour a natural birth and place high importance on the criteria physiology, active birth experience and personal assistance. Characteristics of the Cesarean section that were viewed negatively include surgery and pain.
CONCLUSION: The rise in Cesarean section rates cannot be explained by the patients' preferences. In terms of patient autonomy, obstetricians should respect a woman's wish for vaginal delivery, avoiding medical intervention if clinically possible. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21348007     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol        ISSN: 0948-2393            Impact factor:   0.685


  2 in total

1.  Can the Rate of C-sections Performed in a Level I Perinatal Center Be Reduced? - An Analysis of the University Gynecology Clinic Rostock, 2008 - 2014.

Authors:  Nele Genuttis; Michael Bolz; Volker Briese
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Depression, anxiety and stress in women with breech pregnancy compared to women with cephalic presentation-a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Madeleine Schauer; Elisabetta Latartara; Maria Alonso-Espias; Emma Rossetti; Pimrapat Gebert; Wolfgang Henrich; Larry Hinkson
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-27       Impact factor: 2.344

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.