Literature DB >> 35344029

Infigratinib in Patients with Recurrent Gliomas and FGFR Alterations: A Multicenter Phase II Study.

Andrew B Lassman1, Juan Manuel Sepúlveda-Sánchez2, Timothy F Cloughesy3, Miguel J Gil-Gil4, Vinay K Puduvalli5, Jeffrey J Raizer6, Filip Y F De Vos7, Patrick Y Wen8, Nicholas A Butowski9, Paul M J Clement10, Morris D Groves11, Cristóbal Belda-Iniesta12, Pierre Giglio5, Harris S Soifer13, Steven Rowsey13, Cindy Xu13, Francesca Avogadri13, Ge Wei13, Susan Moran13, Patrick Roth14.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: FGFR genomic alterations (amplification, mutations, and/or fusions) occur in ∼8% of gliomas, particularly FGFR1 and FGFR3. We conducted a multicenter open-label, single-arm, phase II study of a selective FGFR1-3 inhibitor, infigratinib (BGJ398), in patients with FGFR-altered recurrent gliomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adults with recurrent/progressive gliomas harboring FGFR alterations received oral infigratinib 125 mg on days 1 to 21 of 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate by Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed on available pretreatment archival tissue to explore additional molecular correlations with efficacy.
RESULTS: Among 26 patients, the 6-month PFS rate was 16.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.0-32.5], median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI, 1.1-2.8), and objective response rate was 3.8%. However, 4 patients had durable disease control lasting longer than 1 year. Among these, 3 had tumors harboring activating point mutations at analogous positions of FGFR1 (K656E; n = 2) or FGFR3 (K650E; n = 1) in pretreatment tissue; an FGFR3-TACC3 fusion was detected in the other. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-related adverse event (all-grade, 76.9%; grade 3, 3.8%) and is a known on-target toxicity of FGFR inhibitors.
CONCLUSIONS: FGFR inhibitor monotherapy with infigratinib had limited efficacy in a population of patients with recurrent gliomas and different FGFR genetic alterations, but durable disease control lasting more than 1 year was observed in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1 or FGFR3 point mutations or FGFR3-TACC3 fusions. A follow-up study with refined biomarker inclusion criteria and centralized FGFR testing is warranted. ©2022 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35344029      PMCID: PMC9167702          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2664

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   13.801


  32 in total

1.  Efficacy of BGJ398, a Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1-3 Inhibitor, in Patients with Previously Treated Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma with FGFR3 Alterations.

Authors:  Sumanta K Pal; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean H Hoffman-Censits; Raanan Berger; David I Quinn; Matthew D Galsky; Juergen Wolf; Christian Dittrich; Bhumsuk Keam; Jean-Pierre Delord; Jan H M Schellens; Gwenaelle Gravis; Jacques Medioni; Pablo Maroto; Virote Sriuranpong; Chaiyut Charoentum; Howard A Burris; Viktor Grünwald; Daniel Petrylak; Ulka Vaishampayan; Eliahu Gez; Ugo De Giorgi; Jae-Lyun Lee; Jens Voortman; Sumati Gupta; Sunil Sharma; Amir Mortazavi; David J Vaughn; Randi Isaacs; Katie Parker; Xueying Chen; Kun Yu; Dale Porter; Diana Graus Porta; Dean F Bajorin
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Sequence survey of receptor tyrosine kinases reveals mutations in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Vikki Rand; Jiaqi Huang; Tim Stockwell; Steve Ferriera; Oleksandr Buzko; Samuel Levy; Dana Busam; Kelvin Li; Jennifer B Edwards; Charles Eberhart; Kathleen M Murphy; Alexia Tsiamouri; Karen Beeson; Andrew J G Simpson; J Craig Venter; Gregory J Riggins; Robert L Strausberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-09-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  FGFR-TACC gene fusions in human glioma.

Authors:  Anna Lasorella; Marc Sanson; Antonio Iavarone
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Regulation of renal phosphate transport by FGF23 is mediated by FGFR1 and FGFR4.

Authors:  Jyothsna Gattineni; Priyatharshini Alphonse; Qiuyu Zhang; Nisha Mathews; Carlton M Bates; Michel Baum
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2013-11-20

5.  Phase III study of enzastaurin compared with lomustine in the treatment of recurrent intracranial glioblastoma.

Authors:  Wolfgang Wick; Vinay K Puduvalli; Marc C Chamberlain; Martin J van den Bent; Antoine F Carpentier; Lawrence M Cher; Warren Mason; Michael Weller; Shengyan Hong; Luna Musib; Astra M Liepa; Donald E Thornton; Howard A Fine
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan plus carmustine in glioblastoma recurrent or progressive after first-line temozolomide chemotherapy: a phase II study of the Gruppo Italiano Cooperativo di Neuro-Oncologia (GICNO).

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Alicia Tosoni; Umberto Basso; Michele Reni; Francesco Valduga; Silvio Monfardini; Pietro Amistà; Linda Nicolardi; Guido Sotti; Mario Ermani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Monika E Hegi; Annie-Claire Diserens; Thierry Gorlia; Marie-France Hamou; Nicolas de Tribolet; Michael Weller; Johan M Kros; Johannes A Hainfellner; Warren Mason; Luigi Mariani; Jacoline E C Bromberg; Peter Hau; René O Mirimanoff; J Gregory Cairncross; Robert C Janzer; Roger Stupp
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  FGFR genetic alterations predict for sensitivity to NVP-BGJ398, a selective pan-FGFR inhibitor.

Authors:  Vito Guagnano; Audrey Kauffmann; Simon Wöhrle; Christelle Stamm; Moriko Ito; Louise Barys; Astrid Pornon; Yao Yao; Fang Li; Yun Zhang; Zhi Chen; Christopher J Wilson; Vincent Bordas; Mickaël Le Douget; L Alex Gaither; Jason Borawski; John E Monahan; Kavitha Venkatesan; Thomas Brümmendorf; David M Thomas; Carlos Garcia-Echeverria; Francesco Hofmann; William R Sellers; Diana Graus-Porta
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients.

Authors:  Alba A Brandes; Enrico Franceschi; Alicia Tosoni; Valeria Blatt; Annalisa Pession; Giovanni Tallini; Roberta Bertorelle; Stefania Bartolini; Fabio Calbucci; Alvaro Andreoli; Giampiero Frezza; Marco Leonardi; Federica Spagnolli; Mario Ermani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Absence of MGMT promoter methylation in diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant.

Authors:  Rouzbeh Banan; Arne Christians; Stephan Bartels; Ulrich Lehmann; Christian Hartmann
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 7.801

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Small molecule inhibitors targeting the cancers.

Authors:  Gui-Hong Liu; Tao Chen; Xin Zhang; Xue-Lei Ma; Hua-Shan Shi
Journal:  MedComm (2020)       Date:  2022-10-13

Review 2.  FGFR3-TACCs3 Fusions and Their Clinical Relevance in Human Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hanna Gött; Eberhard Uhl
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 3.  Patient Selection Approaches in FGFR Inhibitor Trials-Many Paths to the Same End?

Authors:  Peter Ellinghaus; Daniel Neureiter; Hendrik Nogai; Sebastian Stintzing; Matthias Ocker
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 7.666

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.