Literature DB >> 35344007

A comparative assessment of the amount and rate of orthodontic space closure toward a healed vs recent lower premolar extraction site.

Elham S Abu Alhaija, Rami A Al Shayeb, Susan Al-Khateeb, Hasan O Daher, Saba O Daher.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the amount and rate of space closure and tooth tipping during orthodontic space closure toward a recent vs healed first premolar extraction site.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The mandibular arches of 23 patients were included. Treatment plans included lower first premolar extractions. After reaching 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless-steel archwires (SSAW), patients were subdivided into two groups (Group 1: space closure was carried out toward a healed first premolar extraction space and Group 2: space closure was carried out immediately after first premolar extraction). Elastomeric power chain from second molar to second molar was used to close lower extraction spaces. The following time points were defined: T1: just before space closure; T2-T4: 1-3 months after initial space closure. Records consisted of dental study models. The amount and rate of extraction space closure were evaluated at each time point.
RESULTS: In Group 1 (healed socket), a total amount of 1.98 mm (coronally) and 1.75 mm (gingivally) of space closure was achieved. The rate of space closure was 0.66 mm/month coronally and 0.58 mm/month gingivally. In Group 2 (recent socket), the total amount of space closure was 3.02 mm coronally and 2.68 mm gingivally. The rate of space closure was 1.01 mm/month coronally and 0.89 mm/month gingivally. Differences between the two groups were significant (P < .01). Tipping of adjacent teeth during space closure was similar in both groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: In the lower arch, the amount and rate of space closure toward a recent extraction site were higher than that toward a healed extraction socket with similar tipping of teeth in both groups.
© 2022 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healed; Lower arch; Recent; Space closure, Tipping

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35344007      PMCID: PMC9235382          DOI: 10.2319/102921-797.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.684


  23 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-based knowledge on the biology and treatment of extraction sockets.

Authors:  Christoph H F Hämmerle; Mauricio G Araújo; Massimo Simion
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 2.  Factors affecting the duration of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Mavreas; Athanasios E Athanasiou
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Adverse effects of orthodontic treatment: A clinical perspective.

Authors:  Nabeel F Talic
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2011-01-28

4.  Orthodontic retraction into recent and healed extraction sites. A histologic study.

Authors:  P Diedrich; H Wehrbein
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 5.  Split-mouth designs in orthodontics: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trials.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Tanya Walsh; Argy Polychronopoulou; Christos Katsaros; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  How long does treatment with fixed orthodontic appliances last? A systematic review.

Authors:  Aliki Tsichlaki; Siew Yee Chin; Nikolaos Pandis; Padhraig S Fleming
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Moment to force ratios and the center of rotation.

Authors:  K Tanne; H A Koenig; C J Burstone
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Pretreatment characteristics associated with orthodontic treatment duration.

Authors:  Monica A Fisher; Reid M Wenger; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Youn-Ju Lee; Seong-Hwa Jeong; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Orthodontic treatment time: can it be shortened?

Authors:  Ricardo Moresca
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2018 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.