Literature DB >> 35342864

Statistical Decision-Making Accuracies for Some Overlap- and Distance-based Measures for Single-Case Experimental Designs.

Michael T Carlin1, Mack S Costello1.   

Abstract

Selecting a quantitative measure to guide decision making in single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) is complicated. Many measures exist and all have been rightly criticized. The two general classes of measure are overlap-based (e.g., percentage nonoverlapping data) and distance-based (e.g., Cohen's d). We compare several measures from each category for Type I error rate and power across a range of designs using equal numbers of observations (i.e., 3-10) in each phase. Results showed that Tau and the distance-based measures (i.e., RD and g) provided the highest decision accuracies. Other overlap-based measures (e.g., PND, dual-criterion method) did not perform as well. It is recommended that Tau be used to guide decision making about the presence/absence of a treatment effect, and RD or g be used to quantify the magnitude of the treatment effect. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-021-00317-8. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Ratio of distances; Statistical analysis; Tau

Year:  2021        PMID: 35342864      PMCID: PMC8894531          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00317-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  20 in total

1.  Inconsistent visual analyses of intrasubject data.

Authors:  A Deprospero; S Cohen
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1979

2.  Comparing N = 1 effect size indices in presence of autocorrelation.

Authors:  Rumen Manolov; Antonio Solanas
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2008-05-22

3.  Summarizing single-subject research. Issues and applications.

Authors:  T E Scruggs; M A Mastropieri
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  1998-07

4.  Development of a Distance-Based Effect Size Metric for Single-Case Research: Ratio of Distances.

Authors:  Michael T Carlin; Mack S Costello
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2018-02-21

5.  Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures.

Authors:  James E Pustejovsky
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2018-06-18

6.  Reconsidering overlap-based measures for quantitative synthesis of single-subject data: what they tell us and what they don't.

Authors:  Mark Carter
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2013-02-12

7.  Interrater Agreement on the Visual Analysis of Individual Tiers and Functional Relations in Multiple Baseline Designs.

Authors:  Katie Wolfe; Michael A Seaman; Erik Drasgow
Journal:  Behav Modif       Date:  2016-04-21

8.  An evaluation of the agreement between the conservative dual-criterion method and expert visual analysis.

Authors:  Katie Wolfe; Michael A Seaman; Erik Drasgow; Phillip Sherlock
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2018-03-25

Review 9.  Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.

Authors:  Ulrike Hahn; Paul A Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Machine Learning to Analyze Single-Case Data: A Proof of Concept.

Authors:  Marc J Lanovaz; Antonia R Giannakakos; Océane Destras
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2020-01-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.