| Literature DB >> 35342864 |
Michael T Carlin1, Mack S Costello1.
Abstract
Selecting a quantitative measure to guide decision making in single-case experimental designs (SCEDs) is complicated. Many measures exist and all have been rightly criticized. The two general classes of measure are overlap-based (e.g., percentage nonoverlapping data) and distance-based (e.g., Cohen's d). We compare several measures from each category for Type I error rate and power across a range of designs using equal numbers of observations (i.e., 3-10) in each phase. Results showed that Tau and the distance-based measures (i.e., RD and g) provided the highest decision accuracies. Other overlap-based measures (e.g., PND, dual-criterion method) did not perform as well. It is recommended that Tau be used to guide decision making about the presence/absence of a treatment effect, and RD or g be used to quantify the magnitude of the treatment effect. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40614-021-00317-8. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.Entities:
Keywords: Decision making; Ratio of distances; Statistical analysis; Tau
Year: 2021 PMID: 35342864 PMCID: PMC8894531 DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00317-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perspect Behav Sci ISSN: 2520-8969