| Literature DB >> 35340413 |
Yu-Fang Xie1,2,3, Yan Wang1,2, Yi Rong1,2,3, Wenjun He1,2,4, Meijuan Yan1,2,4, Xinzhi Li1,2,4, Junqiang Si1,2,3, Li Li3,5, Yingying Zhang1,2,3,6, Ketao Ma1,2,3.
Abstract
Aim: To explore the role of Kir2.1 in hypoxia-induced microglial apoptosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35340413 PMCID: PMC8947871 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5855889
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Sequences of the primers.
| Name | Primer sequence | Product (bp) |
|---|---|---|
| Bax | Forward: 5′-CCAGGACGCATCCACCAAGAAG-3′ | 138 |
| Reverse: 5′-GCTGCCACACGGAAGAAGACC-3′ | ||
|
| ||
| Caspase-3 | Forward: 5′-GTACAGAGCTGGACTGCGGTATTG-3′ | 84 |
| Reverse: 5′-AGTCGGCCTCCACTGGTATCTTC-3′ | ||
|
| ||
| Bcl-2 | Forward: 5′-ACGGTGGTGGAGGAACTCTTCAG-3′ | 168 |
| Reverse: 5′-GGTGTGCAGATGCCGGTTCAG-3′ | ||
|
| ||
| Kir2.1 | Forward: 5′-ATGGGCAGTGTGAGAACCAAC-3′ | 113 |
| Reverse: 5′-TGGACTTTACTCTTGCCATTCC-3′ | ||
Figure 1CCK-8 analysis results of cell activity changes and Western blot analysis results of cleaved caspase-3 protein expression. (a) CCK-8 detected BV2 cell activity after CoCl2 intervention. (b) The expression of the apoptosis protein cleaved caspase-3 in BV2 cells was assessed via Western blot analysis. (c) Semiquantitative analysis of the apoptosis protein cleaved caspase-3 levels in BV2. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the control group.
Figure 2Effect of hypoxia on Kir2.1 protein expression. (a) Kir2.1 expression in BV2 (scale bar = 2.5 μm). (b) Statistical analysis of the fluorescence intensity of Kir2.1 expression. (c) Kir2.1 and GAPDH blotting bands. (d) Kir2.1 protein statistical analysis diagram. (e) Kir2.1 mRNA statistical analysis diagram. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus the control group.
Figure 3Effect of hypoxia on Kir2.1 and BV2 membrane potential. (a) Control group BV2 inward rectifier current. (b) Inward rectifying current of BV2 in the CoCl2 group. (c) Kir2.1 statistical diagram of the current amplitude of the net current. (d) BV2 membrane potential statistical diagram. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus the control group.
Figure 4Effect of ML133 on the apoptosis of BV2 cells. (a) The apoptosis rate of BV2 cells was detected via flow cytometry. (b) Statistical diagram of the apoptosis rate of BV2 cells. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗P < 0.05 versus the control group; #P < 0.05 versus the CoCl2 group.
Figure 5Effect of ML133 on mitochondrial membrane potential of BV2 cells. (a) The mitochondrial membrane potential of BV2 cells was detected using the JC-1 Assay Kit by flow cytometry. (b) Statistical diagram of the JC-1 ratio of BV2 cells. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the control group; ##P < 0.01 versus the CoCl2 group.
Figure 6Expressions and distribution of Bax, caspase-3, and Bcl-2 on BV2 cells detected via immunofluorescence cytochemical staining. (a–c) Expression and localization of Bax, caspase-3, and Bcl-2 in BV2 (scale bar = 2.5 μm). (d–f) Semiquantitative statistical analysis of fluorescence intensity. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus the CoCl2 group.
Figure 7Western blot analysis and real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of Bax, caspase-3, and Bcl-2 protein expressions in BV2 cells. (a) Protein bands of Bax, Bcl-2, and cleaved caspase-3 were detected. (b–d) Bax, Bcl-2, and cleaved caspase-3 proteins were analyzed. (e–g) Bax, caspase-3, and Bcl-2 mRNA were analyzed. Mean ± standard deviation. n = 3. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01 versus the control group; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 versus the CoCl2 group.