| Literature DB >> 35340258 |
Jian Cao1,2.
Abstract
Entrepreneurship is a test of people's knowledge and specific application ability, especially the psychological quality of entrepreneurs. In the process of starting a business, people's psychological qualities have a very important influence on the ultimate success of starting a business. The significance of cultivating college students' entrepreneurial psychological quality lies in that it is not only the requirement of the development of the times but also the realistic requirement of improving college students' entrepreneurial ability. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to bring the cultivation of college students' entrepreneurial psychological quality into entrepreneurship education. Good entrepreneurial psychological quality is the cornerstone of the building of entrepreneurship, which can lay the foundation for entrepreneurship and support the whole entrepreneurial process. Because of the importance of entrepreneurial psychological quality in the process of entrepreneurship, it is necessary to analyze the entrepreneurial psychological quality of college students and guide and cultivate them correctly. Based on this, this paper analyzes the penetration of mental health education in the cultivation of College Students' entrepreneurship education, which has a strong practical significance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35340258 PMCID: PMC8942645 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9668220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Spanning tree process.
Empirical analysis results of social entrepreneurship policy and entrepreneurial attitude.
| Variable | Perceptual skills | Perceived opportunity | Entrepreneurial intention | Fear of failure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrepreneurial support | 0.077 | 0.155 | 0.069 | 0.264 |
| Entrepreneurship education | 0.059 | 0.248 | 0.054 | 0.381 |
| Entrepreneurial environment | 0.012 | 0.081 | 0.038 | 0.042 |
| Type of economy | 0.017 | 0.082 | 0.096 | 0.041 |
Figure 2Data relationship between weight value and evaluation value.
Figure 3Overview model.
Evaluation test data.
| Stage | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency | 80.31 | 88.52 | 74.77 | 88.52 | 81.97 | 72.84 |
| Accuracy | 70.59 | 78.78 | 85.64 | 87.96 | 76.35 | 88.29 |
Classification of talent training evaluation.
| Personnel training evaluation parameters | 0–20 | 20–25 | 25–30 | 35–40 | 40–45 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normalized value | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.45 |
Figure 4Data relationship between weight value and evaluation value.
Figure 5Comparison of accuracy data of two analysis methods.
Figure 6The relationship between economic monopoly, enterprise-scale, and technological innovation capability.
Figure 7Network structure system of talent entrepreneurship awareness management.