| Literature DB >> 35337048 |
Shu-Chun Chiu1, Szu-Chieh Hu1, Ling-Min Liao1, Yu-Hua Chen1, Jih-Hui Lin1.
Abstract
The activity of norovirus varies from season to season, and the effect of climate change on the incidence of norovirus outbreaks is a widely recognized yet poorly understood phenomenon. Investigation of the possible association between climatic factors and the incidence of norovirus is key to a better understanding of the epidemiology of norovirus and early prediction of norovirus outbreaks. In this study, clinical stool samples from acute gastroenteritis outbreaks were collected from January 2015 to June 2019 in Taiwan. Data analysis from our study indicated that more than half of the cases were reported in the winter and spring seasons, including those caused by norovirus of genotypes GII (genogroup II).2, GII.3, GII.6, and GII.17, and 45.1% of the patients who tested positive for norovirus were infected by the GII.4 norovirus in autumn. However, GII.6 norovirus accounted for a higher proportion of the cases reported in summer than any other strain. Temperature is a crucial factor influencing patterns of epidemic outbreaks caused by distinct genotypes of norovirus. The results of this study may help experts predict and issue early public warnings of norovirus transmission and understand the effect of climate change on norovirus outbreaks caused by different genotypes and occurring in different locations.Entities:
Keywords: Taiwan; climate change; epidemiology; norovirus
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35337048 PMCID: PMC8948982 DOI: 10.3390/v14030641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Demographic data of patients infected with norovirus by GII genotype in Taiwan, 2015–2019.
| Genotype | GII.2 | GII.3 | GII.4 | GII.6 | GII.17 | Others | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (median, SD) | 12.9 (15.0) | 7.8 (11.3) | 11.5 (30.1) | 16.3 (22.6) | 31.1 (24.0) | 24.0 (17.5) | <0.0001 a |
| Age group | <0.0001 b | ||||||
| <2 y | 4 (0.6) | 7 (8.1) | 20 (12.2) | 1 (0.9) | 1 (0.8) | 4 (6.2) | |
| 2–5 y | 50 (7.8) | 12 (14.0) | 36 (22.0) | 13 (11.7) | 4 (3.0) | 1 (1.5) | |
| 5–12 y | 249 (38.7) | 43 (50.0) | 28 (17.1) | 35 (31.5) | 17 (12.9) | 15 (23.1) | |
| 12–18 y | 88 (13.7) | 9 (10.5) | 11 (6.7) | 10 (9.0) | 14 (10.6) | 1 (1.5) | |
| 18–64 y | 242 (37.6) | 15 (17.4) | 38 (23.2) | 44 (39.6) | 78 (59.1) | 43 (66.2) | |
| 65+ y | 10 (1.6) | 0 (0) | 31 (18.9) | 8 (7.2) | 18 (13.6) | 1 (1.5) | |
| Gender | 0.3989 b | ||||||
| Male | 366 (56.9) | 47 (54.7) | 88 (53.7) | 57 (51.4) | 64 (48.5) | 31 (47.7) | |
| Female | 277 (43.1) | 39 (45.3) | 76 (46.3) | 54 (48.6) | 68 (51.5) | 34 (52.3) | |
| Season | <0.0001 b | ||||||
| Spring | 303 (47.1) | 27 (31.4) | 30 (18.3) | 60 (54.1) | 58 (43.9) | 28 (43.1) | |
| Summer | 38 (5.9) | 11 (12.8) | 12 (7.3) | 23 (20.7) | 11 (8.3) | 7 (10.8) | |
| Autumn | 31 (4.8) | 26 (30.2) | 74 (45.1) | 20 (18.0) | 17 (12.9) | 11 (16.9) | |
| Winter | 271 (42.2) | 22 (25.6) | 48 (29.3) | 8 (7.2) | 46 (34.9) | 19 (29.2) | |
| Area | 0.0439 b | ||||||
| North | 176 (27.4) | 19 (22.1) | 42 (25.8) | 30 (27.0) | 40 (30.5) | 20 (30.8) | |
| West | 177 (27.5) | 24 (27.9) | 60 (36.8) | 39 (35.1) | 42 (32.1) | 20 (30.8) | |
| South | 225 (35.0) | 31 (36.1) | 45 (27.6) | 39 (35.1) | 37 (28.2) | 14 (21.5) | |
| East | 65 (10.1) | 12 (14.0) | 16 (9.8) | 3 (2.7) | 12 (9.2) | 11 (16.9) | |
| Identity | <0.0001 b | ||||||
| common patient | 145 (22.6) | 14 (16.3) | 29 (17.7) | 29 (26.1) | 56 (42.4) | 28 (43.1) | |
| Student | 420 (65.3) | 65 (75.6) | 82 (50.0) | 59 (53.2) | 35 (26.5) | 27 (41.5) | |
| Resident of | 20 (3.1) | 3 (3.5) | 29 (17.7) | 7 (6.3) | 19 (14.4) | 0 (0) | |
| Chef/Kitchen worker | 17 (2.6) | 0 (0) | 6 (3.7) | 7 (6.3) | 5 (3.8) | 5 (7.7) | |
| Nurse | 9 (1.4) | 2 (2.3) | 9 (5.5) | 4 (11.1) | 9 (6.8) | 3 (4.6) | |
| Prisoner/Military | 28 (4.4) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.6) | 1 (0.9) | 7 (5.3) | 0 (0) | |
| Others | 4 (0.6) | 2 (2.3) | 8 (4.9) | 4 (11.1) | 1 (0.8) | 2 (3.1) |
Note: Data are presented as n (%), SD = standard deviation. a p value was calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. b p value was calculated using the χ2 test.
Figure 1Trends in norovirus infections over time and average daily temperature (A), rainfall (B), and sunshine (C) in Taiwan, 2015–2019.
Figure 2Trends of norovirus genogroup II infections over time and daily temperature in diverse regions of Taiwan, 2015–2019: (A) North region; (B) West region; (C) South region; (D) East region. In all regions, except the East region, data archived a level of statistical significance in simple linear regression analysis (p < 0.05).
Relationship between norovirus and climatic factors in Taiwan, 2015–2019.
| Multivariate Linear Regression Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variate | Estimate parameter | R2 | |
| Tempareture | −0.8773 | <0.0001 | 0.1712 |
| Rainfall | 0.0014 | 0.6303 | |
| Sunsine | 0.0328 | 0.0022 | |
Figure 3Relationship between norovirus GII genotypes and temperature; p < 0.0001 as calculated using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Relationship between norovirus genogroup II genotypes and temperature in Taiwan, 2015–2019.
| Norovirus | GII.2 | GII.3 | GII.4 | GII.6 | GII.17 | Others | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | <0.0001 | ||||||
| 15–20 | 210 (32.7) | 19 (22.6) | 36 (22.8) | 9 (8.6) a | 49 (38.6) | 24 (40.0) | |
| 20–25 | 300 (46.7) | 26 (31.0) | 61 (38.6) | 36 (34.3) | 43 (33.9) | 11 (18.3) | |
| 25–30 | 132 (20.6) | 39 (46.4) | 61 (38.6) | 60 (57.1) b | 35 (27.6) | 25 (41.7) |
Note: Data are presented as n (%), SD = standard deviation. a p < 0.05 (χ test) for GII.6 vs. GII.2. GII.3, GII.4, GII.17 and others. b p < 0.05 (χ test) for GII.6 vs. GII.2 and GII.17.