Literature DB >> 35336950

OraSure InteliSwab Rapid Antigen Test Performance with the SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern-Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron.

Zachary A Weishampel1, Janean Young2, Mark Fischl2, Robert J Fischer1, Irene Owusu Donkor1,3, Jade C Riopelle1, Jonathan E Schulz1, Julia R Port1, Taylor A Saturday1, Neeltje van Doremalen1, Jody D Berry2, Vincent J Munster1, Claude Kwe Yinda1.   

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 in the human population and the resulting COVID-19 pandemic have led to the development of various diagnostic tests. The OraSure InteliSwab™ COVID-19 Rapid Test is a recently developed and FDA emergency use-authorized rapid antigen-detecting test that functions as a lateral flow device targeting the nucleocapsid protein. Due to SARS-CoV-2 evolution, there is a need to evaluate the sensitivity of rapid antigen-detecting tests for new variants, especially variants of concern such as Omicron. In this study, the sensitivity of the OraSure InteliSwab™ Test was investigated using cultured strains of the known variants of concern (VOCs, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron) and the ancestral lineage (lineage A). Based on dilution series in cell culture medium, an approximate limit of detection for each variant was determined. The OraSure InteliSwab™ Test showed an overall comparable performance using recombinant nucleocapsid protein and different cultured variants, with recorded limits of detection ranging between 3.77 × 105 and 9.13 × 105 RNA copies/mL. Finally, the sensitivity was evaluated using oropharyngeal swabs from Syrian golden hamsters inoculated with the six VOCs. Ultimately, the OraSure InteliSwab™ COVID-19 Rapid Test showed no decrease in sensitivity between the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and any VOCs including Omicron.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Delta; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; rapid antigen-detecting test; variants of concern

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35336950      PMCID: PMC8951130          DOI: 10.3390/v14030543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Viruses        ISSN: 1999-4915            Impact factor:   5.048


1. Introduction

Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, a wide variety of diagnostic assays have been developed. These assays primarily use quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (qRT-PCRs) which detect viral RNA. Due to their high sensitivity and specificity, qRT-PCRs function as the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnostics [1]. However, qRT-PCR-based diagnostics require advanced laboratory infrastructure and trained personnel. Furthermore, the relatively long time to receive results could hamper direct decision making. Another diagnostic assay is the rapid antigen-detecting test (RDT). RDTs can be performed at home, produce results within hours [2,3,4,5], and complement qRT-PCR-based diagnostics [6]. As the name suggests, RDTs are based on the detection of antigen presence. The emergence of new variants of concern (VOCs) highlights the need to continuously validate current diagnostic assays. Here, we assess the sensitivity of the OraSure InteliSwab™ using all currently identified VOCs (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron [7]) compared to the ancestral lineage (lineage A) of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we employ the Syrian hamster COVID-19 model to determine the InteliSwab™ performance in a controlled infection environment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Recombinant Nucleocapsid Protein Assay

SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteins (NPs) of described variants were expressed with an N-terminus poly-histidine tag in BL21(DE3) cells. Affinity capture of the protein was performed using nickel sepharose HP, followed by a buffer exchange into Tris/NaCl using a GE HiTrap 26/10 desalting column. The lineage A variant was expressed using reference sequence QHD43423.2, amino acids 1–419. Subsequent SARS-CoV-2 variant mutations were cloned via mutagenesis and sequenced confirmed. All recombinant NPs used for device testing were of >95% purity. Expression levels of purified NP were 80–150 mg/L depending on the variant. To load the sample on the test device, 50 µL of sample was introduced at the center of the flat pad. With the developer solution vials resting in the test stand’s slots, the loaded test devices were placed in separate vials containing the developer solution. Each test device was left in the developer solution for 30 min, after which the result was read. A positive result was a red line at the test and control zones.

2.2. Cells and Viruses

The SARS-CoV-2 isolates used in this study are summarized in Table S1. Virus propagation was performed in VeroE6 cells in DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin (DMEM2). VeroE6 cells were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/mL penicillin, and 50 μg/mL streptomycin. At regular intervals, mycoplasma testing was performed. No mycoplasma and no contaminants were detected. Sequencing from viral stocks included libraries prepared from Stranded Total RNA Prep Ligation with Ribo-Zero Plus kit per the manufacturer’s protocol (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq at 2 × 150 base pair reads. No nucleotide change was found >5%.

2.3. InteliSwab™ Assay on SARS-CoV-2 Isolates

Prior to dilutions and tests, each SARS-CoV-2 stock variant was inactivated using irradiation with 2 Mrad. To evaluate the effect of the irradiation process on the InteliSwab™ results, the test was performed on irradiated and unirradiated 10-fold serially diluted Delta variant stocks. The results showed that the sensitivity of OraSure InteliSwab™ COVID-19 Rapid Test was the same for both the irradiated and the unirradiated stocks (Figure S1). Then, 10-fold serial dilutions of irradiated SARS-CoV-2 variants were performed with 1× Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Three OraSure InteliSwab™ COVID-19 Rapid Tests were used to test each dilution, making a total of 15 test devices per variant. The test procedure was carried out as above. More precise limits of detection (LODs) for the test were determined by performing 2-fold serial dilutions in 3 replicates for each variant beginning at the 10-fold dilution LOD. Three test devices were used for each dilution. The same procedures for loading samples and analyzing test results were followed for the 10-fold serial dilutions. The final LOD for each variant was determined to be the minimum concentration (dilution) for which all 9 test devices were positive.

2.4. Ethics Statement

Animal experiments were conducted in an AAALAC International-accredited facility and approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Institutional Care and Use Committee following the guidelines put forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edition, the Animal Welfare Act, United States Department of Agriculture and the United States Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The Institutional Biosafety Committee (IBC) approved work with SARS-CoV-2 strains under BSL3 conditions. Virus inactivation of all samples was performed according to IBC-approved standard operating procedures for the removal of specimens from high containment areas.

2.5. Animal Experiment

Four six-week-old Syrian golden hamsters (N = 6 per group, Envigo Indianapolis) were challenged intranasally with 40 µL of 1 × 103 Median Tissue Culture Infectious Dose (TCID50)/mL virus in sterile DMEM. All virus stocks were full genome sequenced, and no SNPs >10% in spike or nucleoprotein were detected. Weights were recorded daily. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected in 1 mL of DMEM2 on day post infection (DPI) 1–7. A volume of 50 µL of medium was pipetted onto the absorbent pad of the InteliSwab™ as outlined in the instructions for use, described previously.

2.6. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

RNA was extracted from 140 µL of sample for each dilution with the Qiagen QIAamp Viral RNA Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions with an elution volume of 60 µL. Following the extraction, copies of genomic RNA were determined by qRT-PCR with the TaqMan™ Fast Virus One-Step Master Mix and QuantStudio 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System from Applied Biosystems according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The qRT-PCR applied targets the E gene of SARS-CoV-2 [8]. Ten-fold dilutions of SARS-CoV-2 standards with known copy numbers were used to construct a standard curve and calculate copies/mL.

3. Results

Through the use of monoclonal antibodies, the OraSure InteliSwab™ COVID-19 Rapid Test detects the conserved SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (NP). To assess the performance of the InteliSwab™ for different VOCs, we first generated recombinant NP for the identified SARS-CoV-2 VOCs and the ancestral lineage A (Table 1). Sample dilutions were prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 50 µL of the dilution was used on each RDT. In order to determine the limit of detection (LOD), the assay was performed for each of the variant NPs with N = 20 tests. Limited variation was observed between the different NPs; the NP LOD was either 0.313 ng/mL for Alpha and Gamma or 0.469 ng/mL for lineage A, Beta, Delta, and Omicron (Table 2).
Table 1

Nucleocapsid protein mutations of the SARS-CoV-2 variants.

VariantNucleocapsid Mutations by Relative Position
AlphaD3L R203KG204R S235F
Beta T205I
Gamma P80RR203KG204R
Delta D63G R203M D377Y
Omicron P13L R203M
Table 2

InteliSwab™ limits of detection for SARS-CoV-2 variants.

VariantRecombinant Nucleocapsid Protein (ng/mL)TCID50/mLGenome Copies/mLCt-Value
Lineage A0.4692.5 × 1025.61 × 10524.85
Alpha0.3132.5 × 1026.06 × 10525.16
Beta0.4695.0 × 1023.77 × 10525.41
Gamma0.3132.5 × 1034.30 × 10525.03
Delta0.4695.0 × 1029.13 × 10524.36
Omicron0.4695.0 × 1024.51 × 10525.04
The sensitivity of the RDT was also evaluated using SARS-CoV-2 virus isolates. Virus stocks were serially diluted 10-fold, starting at 1 × 105 median tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50)/mL, and SARS-CoV-2 genome copy number and cycle-threshold value (Ct value) were determined. Next, 50 µL of each dilution was tested in triplicate. The lowest virus concentration at which all 3 RDTs were positive was 1 × 103 TCID50/mL for all variants except Gamma, which was 1 × 104 TCID50/mL. These lowest virus dilutions with 3 positive RDTs represented Ct values between 21 and 23 and corresponded to genome copy numbers between 7.72 × 106 and 1.59 × 106 copies/mL. To differentiate further, 2-fold dilutions were performed in triplicate, beginning at the lowest virus concentration with 3 positive RDTs from the 10-fold dilutions described above. Each of these dilutions was then evaluated in triplicate using 50 µL on the RDT. The LOD was defined as the lowest virus concentration with all 9 positive RDTs. The LODs based on TCID50/mL were 2.50 × 102 for both lineage A and Alpha, 5.00 × 102 for Beta, Delta, and Omicron, and 2.50 × 103 for Gamma (Table 2, Figure 1b). For Ct values, the LODs were 24.85 for lineage A, 25.16 for Alpha, 25.41 for Beta, 25.03 for Gamma, 24.36 for Delta, and 25.04 for Omicron (Figure 1c and Figure S2). These values corresponded to genome copies/mL of 5.61 × 105, 6.06 × 105, 3.77 × 105, 4.30 × 105, 9.13 × 105, and 4.51 × 105, respectively.
Figure 1

InteliSwab™ Test detection ability for SARS-CoV-2 variants. Cell culture stocks of the variants were serially diluted, and viral load was measured by gRNA qRT-PCR. (a) Comparison of a positive InteliSwab™ Test (left) and a negative InteliSwab™ Test (right). (b) Box plots displaying the distribution of positive InteliSwab™ Tests across the 6 variants compared to the Ct values, RNA copies/mL, and TCID50/mL. The positive InteliSwabs™ are from the 2-fold dilution series for each variant (from left to right, N = 145, 31, 27, 19, 30, 18, and 20). Shown is the median, minimum, and maximum. (c) Bar charts representing the percentage of positive InteliSwab™ Tests compared to Ct values. Initial Ct values were rounded to the nearest whole number.

To determine the performance of the RDT in a controlled infection environment, we used the SARS-CoV-2 Syrian hamster model. Six 4–6-week-old male and female Syrian golden hamsters were intranasally inoculated with 1 × 103 TCID50/mL for each variant. Oropharyngeal swabs were collected daily in 1 mL DMEM containing 2% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, and 100 units/mL penicillin/streptomycin. Swabs were analyzed by qRT-PCR and tested on the InteliSwab™ (1 RDT per hamster per day, 50 µL). On average, all 6 animals were positive for 4 consecutive days, starting at 1 day post infection (DPI), for lineage A, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta. For Omicron, however, the RDTs were positive 6/6 on 2 DPI, 5/6 on 3 DPI, and 3/6 on 3 and 4 DPI. At 6 and 7 DPI, the tests were all negative (Figure 2a). This was explained by decreased shedding after Omicron infection as compared to the other variants, and not by decreased test sensitivity (Figure 2b). The overall Ct values of positive RDTs were comparable between the different viruses and were at most 24–26 (Figure 2c). Combined with the reduction in shedding in this animal model, this suggests that the functioning of the RDT is directly related to the infection kinetics within the host.
Figure 2

InteliSwab™ results for SARS-CoV-2 variants in Syrian golden hamsters. For each variant, animals (N = 6) were inoculated with 1 × 103 TCID50/mL. Oropharyngeal swabs were taken for 7 days. (a) Box plots depicting viral load (gRNA) in swabs across the 7 days; box and whiskers represent the median, minimum, maximum, and individual Ct values. Gray lines represent the mean Ct value of oropharyngeal swabs for each day. Pie charts show results of oropharyngeal swabs tested by InteliSwab™; blue = positive; orange = negative. For b and c, statistical significance was measured by the Kruskal–Wallis test. (b) Box plots showing cumulative (area under the curve (AUC) analysis) respiratory shedding of SARS-CoV-2 variants viral load in oropharyngeal swabs measured by gRNA. Box and whiskers represent the median, minimum, and maximum cumulative respiratory shedding. For lineage A and Omicron, p = 0.0083. For Alpha and Omicron, p = 0.0385. (c) Box plots representing the positive OraSure InteliSwabs™ from all oropharyngeal swabs measured across the 7 days. Box and whiskers represent the median, minimum, and maximum Ct values (from left to right, N = 35, 28, 38, 32, 26, and 10), ns = not significant.

4. Discussion

As SARS-CoV-2 continues to evolve in the human population, there is a concern that diagnostic assays originally designed using the ancestral lineage A strain will not be able to detect new variants. Previous studies have demonstrated no variation in sensitivity for some of the RDT tests between the variants Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and the ancestral strain [9,10,11,12]. However, only a few studies have included Omicron [13]. Because such a pan-variant of concern antigen test is crucial for public health, there is a need to evaluate RDTs on the current VOCs. Using recombinant protein and cell-cultured SARS-CoV-2 variants, we observed only minor differences in the sensitivity of the InteliSwab™ for Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, and Omicron compared to the initial lineage A variant. Thus, we conclude that the mutations present in the NPs for the current VOCs do not affect the detection ability of this RDT. In addition, based on Ct values, no difference in sensitivity was observed when using the InteliSwab™ on Syrian golden hamsters experimentally infected with the different VOCs. When compared to other manufactured RDTs, the InteliSwab™ demonstrated similar sensitivity for lineage A and the VOCs. For example, the commonly used Abbott BinaxNOW™ COVID-19 Antigen Self-Test was initially reported to have a LOD between 8 × 105–2 × 106 genome copies/mL, while the Quidel QuickVue® At-Home OTC COVID-19 Test was determined to have a LOD of 2 × 104 TCID50/mL for lineage A [14,15]. Additionally, when evaluating the sensitivity of 4 other rapid tests, a study found all tests to have a general LOD between 2 × 106–5 × 106 genome copies/mL for lineage A, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta [9]. Ten rapid tests were also previously shown to be capable of detecting the Omicron variant at 2 × 106 copies/mL [13]. Based on our results, recombinant NP can act as a valuable analytical tool for rapid screening the function of RDTs. Differences in post-translational modification in E. coli expressed NP appear not to impact monoclonal antibodies cross recognition of the de facto proteins clinically. This suggests that recombinant NP could be used as a surrogate to live viral testing and would enable easy routine monitoring of emerging VOCs. It is worth noting that peak shedding of lineage A, Alpha, Beta, Gamma, and Delta variants, as determined by the lowest Ct value, was observed at 1 DPI, while peak shedding of Omicron was observed at 2 DPI. In addition, shedding with Omicron in the hamster model trailed off faster as compared to the other VOCs. Therefore, the delay in the detection ability of this RDT in the samples obtained from Syrian golden hamsters inoculated with Omicron suggests that the overall temporal dynamics in viral shedding might have an impact on the RDT’s ability to detect infection. Preliminary human data suggest a shift towards a delay in the peak of viral shedding in humans with Omicron, similar to what is shown here in the hamster model [16,17]. This shedding delay could result in an inability for the RDTs to detect a SARS-CoV-2 infection in its early stages. SARS-CoV-2 has previously shown to have Ct values ranging between 18.77–40 in human oropharyngeal/nasal swabs [18]. While our study is limited by not evaluating the LOD of the InteliSwab™ for human samples, our results support the current rapid antigen testing guidelines made by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a negative result should not be used as a confirmatory result [19]. To conclude, the OraSure InteliSwab™ Test showed comparable sensitivity between the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and all the VOCs including Omicron. Our data would suggest that the InteliSwab™ Test is not affected by the current mutations in the NP; however, it is not clear if future mutations may affect the RDT’s sensitivity. Therefore, there is a need to continuously evaluate existing diagnostic tests. With the potential changes in the temporal dynamics of viral shedding in humans, this should also include the real-world performance of RDTs.
  15 in total

Review 1.  Point-of-care testing detection methods for COVID-19.

Authors:  Qi Song; Xindi Sun; Ziyi Dai; Yibo Gao; Xiuqing Gong; Bingpu Zhou; Jinbo Wu; Weijia Wen
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 6.799

2.  Comparison of four commercial, automated antigen tests to detect SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern.

Authors:  Andreas Osterman; Maximilian Iglhaut; Andreas Lehner; Patricia Späth; Marcel Stern; Hanna Autenrieth; Maximilian Muenchhoff; Alexander Graf; Stefan Krebs; Helmut Blum; Armin Baiker; Natascha Grzimek-Koschewa; Ulrike Protzer; Lars Kaderali; Hanna-Mari Baldauf; Oliver T Keppler
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Analytical Sensitivity of the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Ag Card.

Authors:  Garrett A Perchetti; Meei-Li Huang; Margaret G Mills; Keith R Jerome; Alexander L Greninger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen test: Potential to help reduce community spread?

Authors:  Tuna Toptan; Lisa Eckermann; Annika E Pfeiffer; Sebastian Hoehl; Sandra Ciesek; Christian Drosten; Victor M Corman
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 3.168

5.  Point of care detection of COVID-19: Advancement in biosensing and diagnostic methods.

Authors:  Shariq Suleman; Sudheesh K Shukla; Nitesh Malhotra; Shikandar D Bukkitgar; Nagaraj P Shetti; Roberto Pilloton; Jagriti Narang; Yen Nee Tan; Tejraj M Aminabhavi
Journal:  Chem Eng J       Date:  2021-01-31       Impact factor: 13.273

6.  Systematic review with meta-analysis of the accuracy of diagnostic tests for COVID-19.

Authors:  Beatriz Böger; Mariana M Fachi; Raquel O Vilhena; Alexandre F Cobre; Fernanda S Tonin; Roberto Pontarolo
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.918

7.  Lateral flow antigen tests can sensitively detect live cultured virus of the SARS-CoV-2 B1.1.7 lineage.

Authors:  Konstantina Kontogianni; Ana I Cubas-Atienzar; Dominic Wooding; Kate Buist; Caitlin R Thompson; Christopher T Williams; Lisa Baldwin; Camille Escadafal; Jilian A Sacks; Emily R Adams; Thomas Edwards
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 6.072

8.  Comparative performance of SARS-CoV-2 lateral flow antigen tests and association with detection of infectious virus in clinical specimens: a single-centre laboratory evaluation study.

Authors:  Suzanne Pickering; Rahul Batra; Blair Merrick; Luke B Snell; Gaia Nebbia; Sam Douthwaite; Fiona Reid; Amita Patel; Mark Tan Kia Ik; Bindi Patel; Themoula Charalampous; Adela Alcolea-Medina; Maria Jose Lista; Penelope R Cliff; Emma Cunningham; Jane Mullen; Katie J Doores; Jonathan D Edgeworth; Michael H Malim; Stuart J D Neil; Rui Pedro Galão
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2021-06-30
View more
  6 in total

1.  Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) attenuates severe acute respiratory coronavirus disease 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection by blocking the interaction of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2.

Authors:  Tomokazu Ohishi; Takayuki Hishiki; Mirza S Baig; Sajjan Rajpoot; Uzma Saqib; Tomohiko Takasaki; Yukihiko Hara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Analytical Sensitivity of Six SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Tests for Omicron versus Delta Variant.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Bayart; Jonathan Degosserie; Julien Favresse; Constant Gillot; Marie Didembourg; Happy Phanio Djokoto; Valérie Verbelen; Gatien Roussel; Céline Maschietto; François Mullier; Jean-Michel Dogné; Jonathan Douxfils
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 3.  Performance and application evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay.

Authors:  Qing Ye; Wenxia Shao; Hanyan Meng
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 20.693

4.  Evaluation of the DiaSorin LIAISON SARS-CoV-2 antigen assay on nasopharyngeal swabs in two different SARS-CoV-2 pandemic waves in Switzerland: The impact of the Omicron variant on its performance.

Authors:  Stephanie Uster; Zana Topalli; Thomas Sasse; Franziska Suter-Riniker; Maria Teresa Barbani
Journal:  J Clin Virol Plus       Date:  2022-06-26

5.  ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) or nCoV-19-Beta (AZD2816) protect Syrian hamsters against Beta Delta and Omicron variants.

Authors:  Neeltje van Doremalen; Jonathan E Schulz; Danielle R Adney; Taylor A Saturday; Robert J Fischer; Claude Kwe Yinda; Nazia Thakur; Joseph Newman; Marta Ulaszewska; Sandra Belij-Rammerstorfer; Greg Saturday; Alexandra J Spencer; Dalan Bailey; Colin A Russell; Sarah C Gilbert; Teresa Lambe; Vincent J Munster
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 17.694

6.  Analytical sensitivity of six lateral flow antigen test kits for variant strains of SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Yoshitomo Morinaga; Hiroshi Yamada; Yoshihiro Yoshida; Hitoshi Kawasuji; Yoshihiro Yamamoto
Journal:  J Infect Chemother       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.065

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.