| Literature DB >> 35336724 |
Teresa Rampino1, Marilena Gregorini1,2, Giuliana Germinario3,4, Eleonora Francesca Pattonieri1, Fulvia Erasmi1, Maria Antonietta Grignano1, Stefano Bruno5,6, Esra Alomari5, Stefano Bettati6,7, Annalia Asti1, Marina Ramus1, Mara De Amici8, Giorgia Testa9, Stefania Bruno10, Gabriele Ceccarelli11, Nicoletta Serpieri1, Carmelo Libetta1,2, Vincenzo Sepe1, Flavia Blasevich12, Federica Odaldi3, Lorenzo Maroni3, Francesco Vasuri13, Gaetano La Manna14, Matteo Ravaioli3,4.
Abstract
The poor availability of kidney for transplantation has led to a search for new strategies to increase the donor pool. The main option is the use of organs from extended criteria donors. We evaluated the effects of hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) with and without extracellular vesicles (EV) derived from mesenchymal stromal cells on ischemic/reperfusion injury of marginal kidneys unsuitable for transplantation. For normothermic reperfusion (NR), we used artificial blood as a substitute for red blood cells. We evaluated the global renal ischemic dam-age score (GRS), analyzed the renal ultrastructure (RU), cytochrome c oxidase (COX) IV-1 (a mitochondrial distress marker), and caspase-3 renal expression, the tubular cell proliferation index, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) tissue levels, and effluent lactate and glucose levels. HOPE+EV kidneys had lower GRS and better RU, higher COX IV-1 expression and HGF and VEGF levels and lower caspase-3 expression than HOPE kidneys. During NR, HOPE+EV renal effluent had lower lactate release and higher glucose levels than HOPE renal effluent, suggesting that the gluconeogenesis system in HOPE+EV group was pre-served. In conclusion, EV delivery during HOPE can be considered a new organ preservation strategy for increasing the donor pool and improving transplant outcome.Entities:
Keywords: COXIV-1; HGF; VEGF; caspase 3; expanded criteria donors; extracellular vesicles; ischemia/reperfusion injury; kidney transplantation; machine perfusion; mesenchymal stromal cells
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336724 PMCID: PMC8945029 DOI: 10.3390/biology11030350
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biology (Basel) ISSN: 2079-7737
Figure 1Trial design. Samples of effluent were collected at the beginning and end of HOPE and normothermic reperfusion. Biopsies were performed at the end of hypothermic and normothermic preservations. SCS, static cold storage; HOPE, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion; HOPE+EV, hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion with extracellular vesicles derived from mesenchymal stromal cells; HBOCs, hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers; NR HOPE, normothermic reperfusion of HOPE-perfused kidneys; NR HOPE+EV, normothermic reperfusion of HOPE+EV-perfused kidneys.
Donors and kidney characteristics.
| Donor 1 | Donor 2 | Donor 3 | Donor 4 | Donor 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 72 | 72 | 80 | 81 | 81 |
|
| F | F | M | F | F |
| 90 | 72 | 85 | 80 | 80 | |
| 1.55 | 1.60 | 1.75 | 1.50 | 1.50 | |
| 37.50 | 28.10 | 27.80 | 35.60 | 35.60 | |
|
| A | 0 | A | A | 0 |
|
| Pos | Pos | Pos | Pos | Neg |
|
| ch | ch | ch | is | ch |
|
| 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 8 |
|
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
|
| DBD | DBD | DBD | DBD | DBD |
| 17 | 37 | 32 | 22 | 16 |
BMI, body mass index; BG, blood group; R, right; L, left; ch, cerebral hemorrhage; is, ischemic stroke; DBD, donor after brain death; SCS, static cold storage; h, hours.
Perfusion parameters.
| Time | Variables | HOPE | HOPE+EV | NR HOPE | NR HOPE+EV | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Flow | 67.0 | 64.4 | 141.8 | 163.0 | NS |
| Resistances | 0.36 | 0.39 | 0.29 | 0.29 | NS | |
|
| Flow | 68.3 | 62.2 | 183.0 | 183.3 | NS |
| Resistances | 0.31 | 0.38 | 0.25 | 0.23 | NS |
T0, time at the beginning of HOPE or NR HOPE with and without EV. Tend, time at the end of HOPE or NR HOPE with and without EV.
Figure 2Renal morphology. PAS staining of representative renal sections from the SCS group (A), HOPE group (B), HOPE+EV group (C), NR HOPE group (D), and NR HOPE+EV group (E). ×20 magnification.
Figure 3Renal ultrastructure. Representative TEM renal sections of all groups. (A) SCS kidney sections showing loss of normal cell architecture, cell shrinkage and necrosis, and thickened chromatin on the nuclear membrane. Bar = 2 µm. (B) At greater magnification, dysmorphic and swollen mitochondria with loss or distortion of cristae can be seen. Bar = 2 µm. (C) HOPE kidney sections showing partial loss of cell architecture and nuclear membrane invagination. Bar = 2 µm. (D) At greater magnification: spheroidal (arrow) and elongated (arrowhead) mitochondria can be seen. Bar = 5 µm. (E) HOPE+EV kidney sections showing well-preserved cell architecture, normal nucleus and basal membrane, and numerous basal micropedici (arrow). Bar = 2 µm. (F) Higher magnification showing that normal morphology of the mitochondria and cristae was well preserved. Bar = 2 µm. (G) NR HOPE kidney sections showing cytoplasmic vacuolization (arrow). Bar = 5 µm. (H) At greater magnification, brush borders with short and spaced microvilli (arrow) can be seen. Bar = 2 µm. (I) NR HOPE+EV sections showing cells with normal morphology and organelles. Bar = 5 µm. (L) At greater magnification, a long, preserved brush border can be seen. Bar = 2 µm.
Figure 4COX IV-1 renal expression. Top: Representative renal sections of COX IV-1 staining in the HOPE group (A), HOPE+EV group (B), NR-HOPE group (C), and NR-HOPE+EV group (D). ×20 magnification. Bottom: Columns represent COX IV-1 positive staining percentage in all groups. Data are the median and IQR, or min and max. (NR HOPE+EV vs. HOPE and HOPE+EV **** p < 0.0001; vs. NR HOPE ** p < 0.005).
Figure 5(A) Caspase-3 renal expression: columns represent caspase-3-positive cells/HPF in all groups. Data are represented as median and IQR (boxes), and min and max (whiskers). ** p < 0.05 vs. HOPE, *** p < 0.001 vs. HOPE. (B) Tubular cell proliferation index: the number of PCNA-positive nuclei/total nuclei of each tubule was lower in the HOPE and NR HOPE groups than in the HOPE+EV and NR HOPE+EV groups (ANOVA, p < 0.0001; Tukey Multiple Comparison Test, HOPE vs. HOPE+EV **** p < 0.0001 and vs. NR HOPE ** p < 0.005; HOPE+EV vs. NR HOPE+EV p < 0.001; NR HOPE vs. NR HOPE+EV p < 0.0001).
Lactate and glucose concentrations in effluent fluid at the beginning and end of HOPE with and without EV.
| Variables | HOPE | HOPE+EV | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | Tend | T0 | Tend | ||
| Lactate | 0.7 | 1.4 * | 0.6 | 1.9 ° | <0.05 |
| Glucose | 174.3 | 165.8 | 184.4 (9.6) | 170.2 § | <0.05 |
* p < 0.05 vs. T0 HOPE, ° p < 0.05 vs. T0 HOPE+EV; § p < 0.05 vs. T0 HOPE+EV.
Figure 6Effluent lactate and glucose levels in all groups at the beginning and end of HOPE and NR HOPE with or without EV, expressed as the Tend/T0 ratio. * p < 0.05 vs. NR HOPE.