| Literature DB >> 35336663 |
Rosa Tundis1, Nicodemo Giuseppe Passalacqua2, Marco Bonesi1, Monica Rosa Loizzo1.
Abstract
Even though Salvia is one of the most known genera of the Lamiaceae family, some traditionally used Salvia species are still now less investigated. To that end, the present study aims to evaluate the chemical profile and the potential bioactivities of extracts and related fractions obtained from the endemic sage Salvia haematodes L. by applying a traditional extraction method such as Soxhlet apparatus (SHS) and the rapid solid-liquid dynamic extraction (RSLDE) by Naviglio extractor® (SHN), considered among the "green techniques" operating at room temperature and with minimum solvent employment and minimum energy. Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) inhibitory activity was measured by a modified Ellman's method. The antioxidant activity was investigated by using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), 2,2'-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), ferric reducing ability power (FRAP), and β-carotene bleaching tests. The SHN methanol fraction resulted the most active in all assays in particular in inhibiting lipid peroxidation with IC50 of 1.7 and 1.6 μg/mL, respectively, after 30 and 60 min of incubation. The SHN n-hexane fraction exhibited a selective activity against AChE with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 22.9 μg/mL, while the SHS n-hexane extract was more active against BChE (IC50 of 30.9 μg/mL). Based on these results, these fractions were subjected to further bio-fractionation by Medium Pressure Liquid Chromatography (MPLC) and the relative obtained fractions were investigated for their AChE and BChE inhibitory activity. A comparative analysis with bio-activity and chemical profile was performed. The observed biological effects provided us with a good starting point for further studies on S. haematodes extracts and fractions such as agents beneficial for the treatment of AD.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Salvia haematodes; Soxhlet apparatus; antioxidant potential; extractor Naviglio®; medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC); rapid solid–liquid dynamic extraction (RSLDE)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336663 PMCID: PMC8956035 DOI: 10.3390/plants11060781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Salvia haematodes L. from Calabria (Southern Italy): (a) full plant in flower, and (b) inflorescence.
Cholinesterases (AChE and BChE) inhibitory activity (IC50 μg/mL) of S. haematodes.
|
| Extract/Fraction | AChE | BChE | SI # |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHN | Total | 396.4 ± 3.4 a | 559.9 ± 5.2 a | 1.4 |
| Methanol | 4.5% # | 33.1% # | - | |
| 22.9 ± 1.0 a | 408.4 ± 3.8 a | 17.8 | ||
| SHS | Total | 249.8 ± 2.7 a | 35.8 ± 0.9 a | 0.1 |
| Methanol | 458.2 ± 4.2 a | 312.1 ± 3.4 a | 0.7 | |
| 214.2 ± 3.2 a | 30.9 ± 1.1 a | 0.1 | ||
| Physostigmine | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 2.4 ± 0.04 | 12 |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). SHN: S. haematodes aerial parts extracted by extractor Naviglio®; SHS: S. haematodes aerial parts extracted by Soxhlet apparatus. # SI (Selectivity Index): IC50 BChE/IC50 AChE. # percentage of inhibition at the concentration of 500 µg/mL. AChE and BChE tests: One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by a multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with physostigmine.
The main constituents (%) of S. haematodes n-hexane fractions.
| Compound | Class | RI a | SHN | SHS | I.M. b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabinene | MH | 973 | 1.3 ± 0.04 | tr | 1, 2, 3 |
| Eugenol | PH | 1354 | 0.7 ± 0.02 | - | 1, 2 |
| SH | 1415 | 7.7 ± 2.3 | 4.6 ± 0.7 | 1, 2, 3 | |
| α-Humulene | SH | 1455 | 1.5 ± 0.2 | tr | 1, 2 |
| γ-Muurolene | SH | 1478 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | - | 1, 2 |
| γ-Cadinene | SH | 1515 | 0.4 ± 0.05 | 0.3 ± 0.04 | 1, 2 |
| δ-Cadinene | SH | 1526 | 1.4 ± 0.01 | 0.5 ± 0.06 | 1, 2 |
| Caryophyllene oxide | OS | 1580 | tr | 3.5 ± 1.0 | 1, 2 |
| Neophytadiene | DI | 1837 | 24.9 ± 2.3 | 17.8 ± 1.5 | 1, 2 |
| Phytol | DI | 2111 | 2.5 ± 1.2 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 1, 2 |
| Methyl myristate | FA | 1726 | 0.9 ± 0.02 | - | 1, 2 |
| Methyl palmitate | FA | 1928 | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 6.7 ± 0.7 | 1, 2 |
| Methyl linoleate | FA | 1996 | 3.1 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 0.03 | 1, 2 |
| Methyl heptadecanoate | FA | 2030 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 1, 2 |
| Methyl stearate | FA | 2128 | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | 1, 2 |
| Tetradecane | AL | 1400 | 0.7 ± 0.02 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Heptadecane | AL | 1700 | 0.5 ± 0.03 | tr | 1, 2, 3 |
| Octadecane | AL | 1800 | 0.7 ± 0.01 | 0.4 ± 0.05 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Nonadecane | AL | 1900 | 0.3 ± 0.01 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Docosane | AL | 2200 | 1.1 ± 0.02 | 1.0 ± 0.06 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Tetracosane | AL | 2400 | 1.2 ± 0.01 | tr | 1, 2, 3 |
| Pentacosane | AL | 2500 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 8.6 ± 0.7 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Heptacosane | AL | 2700 | 1.8 ± 0.04 | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Octacosane | AL | 2800 | 0.9 ± 0.01 | 1.3 ± 0.01 | 1, 2, 3 |
| Stigmasterol | ST | 17.2 ± 1.5 | 5.4 ± 0.9 | 1, 2 | |
| β-Sitosterol | ST | 20.1 ± 2.1 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 1, 2 |
Data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). tr: traces. -: not identified. a RI: Retention indices on the HP-5 column. b IM, identification method: 1: Cmparison of retention times; 2: Comparison of mass spectra with MS libraries, 3: Comparison with authentic compounds. Monoterpene Hydrocarbons: MH; Sesquiterpene Hydrocarbons: SH; Oxygenated Sesquiterpenes: OS; Phenolic compound: PH; Diterpenes: DI; Fatty acids derivatives: FA; Sterols: ST.
In vitro antioxidant activity of S. haematodes.
|
| DPPH Test | ABTS Test | FRAP Test * | β-Carotene Bleaching Test | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extract/Fraction | 30 min | 60 min | ||||
| SHN | Total | 0.4 ± 0.07 a | 28.1 ± 1.1 a | 49.6 ± 1.7 a | 5.3 ± 0.05 a | 7.9 ± 0.08 a |
| 17.9 ± 0.8 a | 81.1 ± 2.8 a | 10.3 ± 0.9 a | 7.7 ± 0.02 | 14.0 ± 0.02 | ||
| Methanol | 0.3 ± 0.03 a | 15.6 ± 1.3 a | 70.3 ± 2.8 a | 1.7 ± 0.09 a | 1.6 ± 1.5 a | |
| SHS | Total | 1.2 ± 0.02 b | 42.1 ± 1.9 a | 48.7 ± 1.7 a | 2.9 ± 0.05 a | 2.6 ± 0.05 |
| 41.9 ± 1.6 a | 220.5 ± 2.5 a | 1.2 ± 0.05 a | 2.8 ± 0.03 a | 2.9 ± 0.07 c | ||
| Methanol | 0.9 ± 0.04 b | 18.0 ± 0.9 a | 58.7 ± 1.2 b | 2.7 ± 0.02 a | 2.5 ± 0.04 | |
| Ascorbic acid | 5.2 ± 0.8 | 1.2 ± 0.03 | - | |||
| BHT | - | - | 63.4 ± 4.5 | |||
| Propyl gallate | 1.3 ± 0.04 | 1.2 ± 0.03 | ||||
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). * Samples tested at the concentration of 2.5 mg/mL. DPPH test: One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with ascorbic acid, b p < 0.05 compared with ascorbic acid; ABTS test: One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with ascorbic acid; FRAP test: One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with ascorbic acid, b p < 0.05 compared with BHT; β-Carotene bleaching test (t = 30 min): One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with propyl gallate; β-Carotene bleaching test (t = 60 min): One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with ascorbic acid, c p > 0.05 compared with propyl gallate.
Total phenol content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) of S. haematodes.
| TPC a | TFC b | TFC/TPC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHN | 55.2 ± 1.3 | 36.5 ± 1.0 | 0.7 |
| SHS | 29.0 ± 1.1 | 7.2 ± 0.5 | 0.2 |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). a mg of chlorogenic acid equivalents (CA)/g of plant materials. b mg of quercetin equivalents (QE)/gram of plant materials.
AChE and BChE inhibitory activity (IC50, μg/mL) of S. haematodes SHN and SHS fractions.
|
| Fraction | AChE | BChE | SI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHN | N1 | 40.2 ± 1.5 a | 61.5 ± 1.6 a | 1.5 |
| N2 | 180.7 ± 4.2 a | 166.3 ± 2.4 a | 0.9 | |
| N3 | 62.1 ± 2.6 a | 73.9 ± 2.2 a | 1.2 | |
| N4 | 564.9 ± 3.4 a | 129.8 ± 2.5 a | 0.2 | |
| N5 | 115.2 ± 1.8 a | 52.7 ± 1.3 a | 0.5 | |
| N6 | 408.6 ± 3.5 a | 53.9 ± 1.6 a | 0.1 | |
| N7 | 141.9 ± 2.8 a | 55.9 ± 1.5 a | 0.3 | |
| N8 | 110.0 ± 2.0 a | 31.5 ± 1.0 a | 0.3 | |
| N9 | 39.5 ± 1.2 a | 43.4 ± 1.1 a | 1.1 | |
| SHS | S1 | 40.4 ± 1.1 a | 112.6 ± 2.4 a | 2.8 |
| S2 | 114.4 ± 3.1 a | 51.4 ± 1.1 a | 0.4 | |
| S3 | 90.9 ± 2.2 a | 82.2 ± 1.4 a | 0.9 | |
| S4 | 418.7 ± 3.6 a | 207.7 ± 4.4 a | 0.5 | |
| S5 | 444.8 ± 3.9 a | 167.0 ± 3.5 a | 0.4 | |
| S6 | 458.7 ± 3.7 a | 110.1 ± 1.2 a | 0.2 | |
| S7 | 307.8 ± 2.8 a | 173.8 ± 4.0 a | 0.6 | |
| Physostigmine | 0.2 ± 0.02 | 2.4 ± 0.04 | 12 |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). SI: IC50 BChE/IC50 AChE. AChE and BChE tests: One-way ANOVA *** p < 0.0001 followed by multicomparison Dunnett’s test: a p < 0.01 compared with physostigmine.