| Literature DB >> 35336639 |
Milica Kanjevac1, Dragana Jakovljević1, Marija Todorović1, Milan Stanković1, Svetlana Ćurčić2, Biljana Bojović1.
Abstract
Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) is a vegetable cultivated worldwide because of its large succulent hypocotyls. The priming method initiates metabolic processes at early stages and regulates the metabolic events in seed necessary for germination. This research was conducted to examine the influence of various priming treatments on physiological performance (germination, growth, lipid peroxidation, primary and secondary metabolism) and antioxidant activity of radish seedlings. On the basis of germination and growth characteristics, vigor index, and relative water content in leaves, it was confirmed that priming treatments with 0.01% ascorbic acid (AA) and 1% KNO3 improves the initial stages of radish development. Furthermore, the efficiency of AA as a priming agent was confirmed through the reduction of malondialdehyde (MDA) level compared to unprimed seedlings. On the other hand, hormopriming with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) significantly increased the concentration of photosynthetic pigments and total soluble leaf proteins compared to non-primed seedlings. The highest content of total phenolic compounds, including flavonoids, were obtained after hormopriming with 1 mM IAA and halopriming with 1% MgSO4. On the basis of the percentage of inhibition of DPPH radicals, it was confirmed that treatments with IAA and AA can improve the antioxidant activity of radish seedlings. This study provides useful information regarding the possibilities of pregerminative metabolic modulation through the seed priming for the biochemical and physiological improvement of radish, and this topic should be further investigated in order to determine the potential use of AA and IAA as suitable priming agents in radish commercial production.Entities:
Keywords: DPPH; MDA; flavonoids; phenolics compounds; priming; vegetable
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336639 PMCID: PMC8949023 DOI: 10.3390/plants11060757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1The moisture content of radish (R. sativus) seeds after priming for 24 h and after desiccation of primed seeds for 48 h prior to germination; control—unprimed seeds. The values represent the means of five replicates ± standard error. Small alphabetical letters (a,b) above the means show the differences (p ≤ 0.05) between primed seeds after desiccation and unprimed seeds, while capital alphabetical letters reveal the differences (p ≤ 0.05) between seeds immediately after 24 h of application of different priming agents by Tukey’s test.
Effect of different priming treatments on germination percentage (%) (GP), mean time for germination (MTG), and rate of germination (RG) of radish (R. sativus).
| Treatment | GP | MTG | RG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 65.56 ± 5.88 #c | 2.73 ± 0.17 c | 36.90 ± 2.28 c |
| GA3 | 82.22 ± 2.94 ab | 1.65 ± 0.16 ab | 61.69 ± 6.24 ab |
| IAA | 68.51 ± 1.49 bc | 2.37 ± 0.11 bc | 42.36 ± 1.85 bc |
| MgSO4 | 84.45 ± 2.22 a | 2.06 ± 0.05 abc | 48.68 ± 1.21 abc |
| KNO3 | 87.78 ± 2.22 a | 1.69 ± 0.06 ab | 59.44 ± 2.13 abc |
| AA | 89.92 ± 3.78 a | 1.91 ± 0.34 ab | 55.75 ± 9.81 abc |
| H2O2 | 82.22 ± 2.22 ab | 1.50 ± 0.10 a | 67.12 ± 4.36 a |
| H2O | 81.11 ± 2.94 abc | 1.89 ± 0.14 ab | 53.58 ± 3.95 abc |
# The values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Effect of different priming treatments on shoot and root length (cm), fresh and dry weight (g), leaf relative water content—RWC (%), seedling weight vigor index (SWVI), and seedling length vigor index (SWVI) of radish (R. sativus).
| Treatment | Root Length | Shoot Length | Fresh Weitgh | Dry Weight | SLVI | SWVI | RWC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 7.26 ± 0.64 #b | 4.74 ± 0.16 ab | 0.0818 ± 0.00 ab | 0.0061 ± 0.00 b | 786.68 ± 70.56 e | 5.36 ± 0.48 d | 92.57 ± 0.55 a |
| GA3 | 9.30 ± 0.67 ab | 5.73 ± 0.29 a | 0.0639 ± 0.00 b | 0.0067 ± 0.00 ab | 1235.82 ± 44.18 ab | 5.25 ± 0.19 d | 89.09 ± 2.62 a |
| IAA | 8.19 ± 0.57 ab | 5.20 ± 0.20 ab | 0.0832 ± 0.01 ab | 0.0077 ± 0.00 ab | 917.30 ± 20.00 ce | 5.70 ± 0.13 cd | 90.54 ± 0.18 a |
| MgSO4 | 8.65 ± 0.73 ab | 4.64 ± 0.35 ab | 0.0899 ± 0.01 a | 0.0073 ± 0.00 ab | 1122.29 ± 29.55 bc | 7.59 ± 0.20 a | 93.82 ± 1.00 a |
| KNO3 | 7.82 ± 0.68 b | 4.74 ± 0.24 ab | 0.0931 ± 0.00 a | 0.0081 ± 0.00 a | 1102.47 ± 27.93 bc | 8.17 ± 0.21 a | 96.59 ± 1.17 a |
| AA | 10.85 ± 0.76 a | 4.25 ± 0.25 b | 0.0777 ± 0.00 ab | 0.0075 ± 0.00 ab | 1357.79 ± 57.11 a | 6.98 ± 0.29 ab | 92.33 ± 2.09 a |
| H2O2 | 7.13 ± 0.55 b | 4.45 ± 0.24 b | 0.0846 ± 0.01 ab | 0.0074 ± 0.00 ab | 952.15 ± 25.75 cde | 6.96 ± 0.19 abc | 94.82 ± 1.20 a |
| H2O | 9.34 ± 0.64 ab | 4.56 ± 0.22 b | 0.0740 ± 0.00 ab | 0.0064 ± 0.00 ab | 1127.47 ± 40.87 bd | 6.00 ± 0.22 bd | 93.32 ± 2.79 a |
# The values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Effect of different priming treatments on pigments content (mg g−1 FW) in leaves of radish (R. sativus) seedlings.
| Treatment | Total Chlorophyll | Chlorophyll | Chlorophyll | Carotenoids |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0.953 ± 0.007 #cd | 0.464 ± 0.007 d | 0.366 ± 0.001 b | 0.083 ± 0.0009 f |
| GA3 | 0.779 ± 0.006 f | 0.427 ± 0.002 e | 0.253 ± 0.003 g | 0.098 ± 0.0006 d |
| IAA | 1.235 ± 0.003 a | 0.665 ± 0.001 a | 0.413 ± 0.002 a | 0.119 ± 0.0003 a |
| MgSO4 | 0.958 ± 0.002 c | 0.521 ± 0.001 c | 0.315 ± 0.001 d | 0.106 ± 0.0003 b |
| KNO3 | 1.070 ± 0.003 b | 0.588 ± 0.001 b | 0.345 ± 0.002 c | 0.101 ± 0.0003 c |
| AA | 0.936 ± 0.002 d | 0.514 ± 0.001 c | 0.303 ± 0.001 e | 0.104 ± 0.0006 bc |
| H2O2 | 0636 ± 0.003 g | 0.358 ± 0.001 f | 0.198 ± 0.002 h | 0.070 ± 0.0007 g |
| H2O | 0.805 ± 0.003 e | 0.440 ± 0.001 e | 0.263 ± 0.002 f | 0.090 ± 0.0006 e |
# The values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 2Influence of different priming treatments on the concentration of total soluble proteins in leaves of radish (R. sativus) seedlings; the values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 3Influence of different priming treatments on malondialdehyde (MDA) content in leaves of radish (R. sativus) seedlings; the values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 4Influence of different priming treatments on concentration of total phenolic compounds (mg of GA g−1 of extract) in the aboveground part of radish (R. sativus) seedlings; the values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 5Influence of different priming treatments on concentration of flavonoids (mg of RU g−1 of extract) in the aboveground part of radish (R. sativus) seedlings; the values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Influence of different priming treatments on percentage of DPPH inhibition in the aboveground parts of radish (R. sativus) seedlings.
| Extract Concentration | Treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | GA3 | IAA | MgSO4 | KNO3 | AA | H2O2 | H2O | |
| 500 | 64.96 ± 0.24 #b | 64.45 ± 0.06 b | 66.81 ± 0.59 a | 62.30 ± 0.12 c | 67.32 ± 0.18 a | 66.91 ± 0.65 a | 61.69 ± 0.12 c | 65.98 ± 0.01 ab |
| 250 | 43.24 ± 1.54 a | 42.63 ± 0.59 a | 45.80 ± 0.06 a | 44.67 ± 6.27 a | 48.16 ± 1.78 a | 51.64 ± 2.48 a | 42.93 ± 0.06 a | 46.72 ± 1.89 a |
| 125 | 25.62 ± 0.36 abc | 19.26 ± 3.32 c | 22.44 ± 2.90 bc | 25.41 ± 0.35 abc | 30.23 ± 2.90 ab | 32.89 ± 2.07 a | 24.90 ± 0.06 abc | 26.85 ± 1.78 abc |
| 62.5 | 16.29 ± 1.48 a | 14.96 ± 1.89 a | 17.52 ± 1.13 a | 15.57 ± 0.12 a | 19.16 ± 0.06 a | 19.78 ± 0.06 a | 16.60 ± 0.95 a | 16.80 ± 1.42 a |
| 31.25 | 12.09 ± 1.54 a | 11.89 ± 1.65 a | 12.50 ± 1.89 a | 12.19 ± 1.95 a | 13.01 ± 1.00 a | 13.73 ± 1.06 a | 12.81 ± 1.24 a | 11.68 ± 1.89 a |
| 15.62 | 11.27 ± 1.30 a | 10.76 ± 2.19 a | 10.66 ± 1.78 a | 10.86 ± 2.13 a | 10.15 ± 1.24 a | 10.45 ± 1.30 a | 11.48 ± 1.54 a | 10.56 ± 2.07 a |
| 7.81 | 10.56 ± 1.12 a | 9.73 ± 1.71 a | 9.63 ± 2.13 a | 9.53 ± 2.19 a | 8.92 ± 1.60 a | 9.74 ± 1.60 a | 10.86 ± 1.42 a | 9.84 ± 1.78 a |
| 3.9 | 9.74 ± 1.36 a | 9.22 ± 1.89 a | 9.02 ± 2.13 a | 9.02 ± 2.25 a | 8.61 ± 1.54 a | 9.02 ± 1.89 a | 9.53 ± 1.13 a | 9.53 ± 1.71 a |
| 1.9 | 9.02 ± 1.07 a | 8.51 ± 2.07 a | 8.61 ± 2.25 a | 8.71 ± 2.31 a | 8.10 ± 1.72 a | 8.51 ± 2.07 a | 8.92 ± 1.24 a | 8.20 ± 1.89 a |
| 0.97 | 8.72 ± 1.00 a | 7.89 ± 1.95 a | 8.30 ± 2.19 a | 8.30 ± 2.43 a | 7.07 ± 1.24 a | 8.20 ± 2.13 a | 9.12 ± 1.71 a | 7.38 ± 2.13 a |
# The values represent the means of six replicates ± standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between treatments according to Tukey’s test.
Summary of the applied priming treatments.
| Priming Treatments | Concentration |
|---|---|
| Gibberellic acid—GA3 | 1 mM |
| Indol-3-acetic acid—IAA | |
| MgSO4 | 1% |
| KNO3 | |
| Hydrogen peroxide—H2O2 | 1% |
| Ascorbic acid—AA | 0.01% |
| H2O | - |