| Literature DB >> 35336633 |
Elizaveta A Porokhovinova1, Tatyana V Shelenga1, Yulia A Kerv1, Valentina I Khoreva1, Alexey V Konarev1, Tamara V Yakusheva1, Andrey V Pavlov1, Anastasia A Slobodkina1, Nina B Brutch1.
Abstract
Flax is one of the oldest oil crops, but only since the end of the twentieth century nutritional use of its whole seeds and flour has been resumed. This crop has been evaluated for its oil fatty acid composition, content of sterols and tocopherols, carbohydrate composition of mucilage, but a comprehensive study has never been carried out, so the aim of the work was to identify differences in the metabolomic profiles of flax lines contrasting in color and size of seeds. The biochemical composition of seeds from 16 lines of the sixth generation of inbreeding was tested using gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. In total, more than 90 compounds related to sugars (78% of the identified substances), free fatty acids (13%), polyatomic alcohols (5%), heterocyclic compounds, free amino acids, phytosterols and organic acids (no more than 2.5% in total) were identified. Statistical analyses revealed six main factors. The first is a factor of sugar content; the second one affects most of organic acids, as well as some free fatty acids, not related to reserve ones, the third factor is related to compounds that play a certain role in the formation of "storage" substances and resistance to stress, the fourth factor is influencing free polar amino acids, some organic and free fatty acids, the fifth one is a factor of phenolic compounds, the sixth factor combined substances not included in the first five groups. Factor analysis made it possible to differentiate all 16 lines, 10 of which occupied a separate position by one or two factors. Interestingly, the first two factors with the highest loads (20 and 15% of the total variability, respectively) showed a separate position of the gc-432 line, which differed from the others, not only by chemical composition, but also by the phenotype of the seeds, while gc-159 differed from the rest ones by the complex of organic acids and other substances taking about 1% of the extracted substances of the seed. Thus, the analysis of metabolomic profiles is promising for a comprehensive assessment of the VIR flax genetic collection, which has wide biochemical diversity.Entities:
Keywords: Linum usitatissimum; biochemical composition of seeds; correlations; genetic collection; metabolomic profiling
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336633 PMCID: PMC8953942 DOI: 10.3390/plants11060750
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
The amount of biologically active substances presented as average values (in n.u.) from all studied VIR flax genetic collection lines.
| Abbreviation | Substance | Average ± Se | Abbreviation | Substance | Average ± Se |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| ||||
| Xyl | xylose | 17.4 ± 4.2 | campstrl | campesterol | 38.2 ± 4.1 |
| Ara | arabinose | 54.8 ± 8.2 | sitostrl | sitosterol | 62.7 ± 3.2 |
| Lyx | lyxose | 1.72 ± 0.30 |
|
|
|
| Rib | ribose | 27.3 ± 4.6 | coniferol | coniferol | 15.9 ± 2.6 |
|
|
|
| kaemph | kaempferol | 26.2 ± 4.8 |
| Fruct | fructose | 38.4 ± 6.6 | caffeic | caffeic acid | 0.89 ± 0.28 |
| Sorb | sorbose | 9.97 ± 2.84 | vanillic | vanillic acid | 0.46 ± 0.09 |
| Gal | galactose | 10.7 ± 3.6 | ferulic | ferulic acid | 96.2 ± 19.5 |
| Glc | glucose | 53.7 ± 8.7 |
|
|
|
| Man | mannose | 60.3 ± 8.0 | quinoline | quinoline | 3.63 ± 0.86 |
| methGluD | methyl glucose | 3.06 ± 0.31 | Iquinoline | isoquinoline | 2.50 ± 0.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Suc | sucrose | 3263 ± 162 |
| ||
| Melib | melibiose | 981 ± 113 | Ala | alanine | 14.2 ± 1.6 |
| Malt | maltose | 26.9 ± 4.3 | Gly | glycine | 10.4 ± 1.0 |
|
|
|
| Pro | proline | 20.0 ± 3.0 |
| Raf | raffinose | 3080 ± 171 | Hyp | hydroxyproline | 12.5 ± 1.4 |
| Tur | turanoseglucopyranoside | 41.0 ± 10.7 | Val | valin | 6.93 ± 0.62 |
|
|
|
| Leu | leucine | 4.66 ± 1.74 |
|
|
|
| Ser | serine | 2.72 ± 0.45 |
| 2OgliDgal | 2-O-glycerol-d-galactopyranoside | 8.92 ± 6.12 | Thr | threonine | 5.99 ± 0.52 |
| glAld | glyceraldehyde | 2.59 ± 0.39 | Asp | aspartic acid | 21.0 ± 2.1 |
|
|
|
| Orn | ornithine | 0.90 ± 0.17 |
|
| Glu | glutamic acid | 19.6 ± 3.7 | ||
| pel | Pelargonic acid | 1.00 ± 0.13 | GABA | gamma-aminobutyric acid | 0.49 ± 0.16 |
| lau | lauric acid | 0.29 ± 0.05 | Phe | phenylalanine | 9.83 ± 1.70 |
| pal | palmitic acid | 94.1 ± 9.5 | His | histidine | 1.12 ± 0.25 |
| lio | linoleic acid | 296 ± 27 | Tyr | tyrosine | 2.55 ± 0.46 |
| ole | oleic acid | 339 ± 37 | carbam | carbamide | 0.63 ± 0.13 |
| lin | alpha-linolenic acid | 349 ± 51 |
|
|
|
| vac | vaccenic acid | 24.6 ± 3.5 |
| ||
| ste | stearic acid | 51.1 ± 6.8 | lactic | lactic acid | 2.93 ± 0.25 |
| eic | eicosanoic acid | 7.79 ± 0.70 | pyruvic | pyruvic acid | 0.71 ± 0.14 |
| glin | gamma-linolenic acid | 40.6 ± 9.6 | methylmalonic | methylmalonic acid | 0.76 ± 0.21 |
| lign | lignoceric acid | 7.09 ± 1.19 | oxalic | oxalic acid | 3.48 ± 0.22 |
|
|
|
| 3hydroxypr | 3-hydroxypropionic acid | 0.98 ± 0.08 |
| MAG1 | monoacylglycerol 16:0 | 8.39 ± 1.36 | phosph | phosphate | 40.1 ± 3.7 |
| MAG2 | monoacylglycerol 18:2 | 35.5 ± 8.1 | methph | methyl phosphate | 1.00 ± 0.06 |
| MAG3 | monoacylglycerol 18:0 | 6.55 ± 0.99 | benzoic | benzoic acid | 0.40 ± 0.08 |
| DAG | diacylglycerol | 32.9 ± 3.2 | PHBA | 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 1.14 ± 0.40 |
|
|
|
| nicotinic | nicotinic acid | 0.22 ± 0.03 |
| parC18 | paraffin wax C18 | 1.65 ± 0.23 | succinic | succinic acid | 1.63 ± 0.29 |
|
|
|
| glyceric | glyceric acid | 0.62 ± 0.08 |
|
| 5hydroxypipecolic | 5-hydroxypipecolic acid | 0.43 ± 0.05 | ||
| erythl | erythritol | 26.8 ± 1.6 | malic | malic acid | 10.2 ± 1.1 |
| glycerol | glycerol | 141 ± 30 | Salicylic | salicylic acid | 0.61 ± 0.10 |
| glyclphs | glycerol-phosphate | 16.4 ± 2.0 | Threonate | threonic acid | 0.89 ± 0.09 |
| xyltl | xylitol | 19.2 ± 4.6 | Tartaric | tartaric acid | 3.53 ± 0.52 |
| mannitol | mannitol | 12.2 ± 5.5 | azelaic | azelaic acid | 8.73 ± 1.01 |
| dulcl | dulcitol | 5.34 ± 0.77 | ribonic | ribonic acid | 2.13 ± 0.26 |
| mInosl | myo-Inositol | 27.3 ± 2.0 | gluALactn | gluconic acid 1,5-lactone | 10.8 ± 2.9 |
| Inosl | inositol | 132 ± 6 | gallic | gallic acid | 2.02 ± 0.32 |
| galtl | galactinol | 67.3 ± 10.8 | gluconic | gluconic acid | 1.16 ± 0.16 |
|
|
|
| IdPUA | L-iduronic acid | 1.01 ± 0.26 |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| |||
Figure 1Box-whiskers plots of substances groups’ contents in seeds of all evaluated VIR flax genetic collection lines (in n.u.). (a) All substance, total sugars and glyceraldehyde; (b) total fatty acids and glycerol, polyhydric alcohols, secondary metabolites, amino acids and carbamide, organic acids and phosphate. Middle point is mean, Box is mean ± standard error, whiskers are min-max intervals.
Figure 2Correlation analysis of biologically active substances in flax seeds. (a) groups of substance; (b) sugars, glyceraldehyde; (c) fatty acids, glycerols, paraffin; (d) polyhydric alcohols; (e) secondary metabolites; (f) amino acids, carbamide; (g) organic acids. In (b–d) small red circles are separate substances, big circle is group of substances, related to each other 0.5 > r > 0.9, individual correlations are not shown, substances without circle are independent from the others. —All substances are related to each other 0.5 > r > 0.9, individual correlations are not shown. r > 0.9, 0.9 > r > 0.7, 0.7 > r > 0.5, r < 0.
Figure 3Box-whiskers plots of substances groups’ contents in seeds of all evaluated VIR flax genetic collection lines) (in n.u.). (a,b)–sugars; (c,d)–fatty acids, glycerols, paraffin; (e)–polyatomic alcohols, (f,g)–phytosterols, phenol-containing substances, heterocyclic aromatic substances; (h)–amino acids and carbamide; (i,j)–organic acids. Middle point is mean, Box is mean ± standard error, whiskers are min-max interval. Abbreviations see in Table 1.
Figure 4Factor analysis of flax metabolomic profile for 90 substances and 16 lines. (a) Factor 1 and Factor 2 system for substances; (b) Factor 1 and Factor 2 system for lines; (c) Factor 3 and Factor 4 system for substances; (d) Factor 3 and Factor 4 system for lines; (e) Factor 5 and Factor 6 system for substances; (f) Factor 5 and Factor 6 system for lines.
Comparison of the substances content in flax lines differing in morphological characteristics according to the criteria of U-Mann-Whitney and t-Student. *—differences between alternative groups by the analyzed parameter are significant at p < 0.05.
| Substance | Morphological Character Presence | Test | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | U-Mann-Whitney | ||||||||
|
| Mean ± Se | Rank Sum |
| Mean ± Se | Rank Sum | Z Adjusted | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 6 | 8.2 ± 3.8 | 28 | 10 | 26.5 ± 4.3 | 109 | 2.57 | 0.01 | 2.91 | 0.01 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 6 | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 80 | 10 | 1.2 ± 0.3 | 56 | −3.15 | 0.002 | 4.77 | 0.0003 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 4 | 0.66 ± 0.09 | 15 | 12 | 1.09 ± 0.05 | 121 | 2.30 | 0.02 | 2.71 | 0.02 |
|
| 4 | 26 ± 2 | 14 | 12 | 45 ± 4 | 122 | 2.43 | 0.02 | 2.50 | 0.03 |
|
| 4 | 1.10 ± 0.21 | 13 | 12 | 2.48 ± 0.28 | 123 | 2.55 | 0.01 | 2.71 | 0.02 |
|
| 4 | 61 ± 6 | 14 | 12 | 107 ± 9 | 122 | 2.43 | 0.02 | 2.66 | 0.02 |
|
| 4 | 14 ± 2 | 16 | 12 | 24 ± 2 | 120 | 2.18 | 0.03 | 2.38 | 0.03 |
|
| 4 | 47 ± 4 | 10 | 12 | 68 ± 3 | 126 | 2.91 | 0.004 | 3.84 | 0.002 |
|
| 4 | 2312 ± 256 | 13 | 12 | 3336 ± 154 | 123 | 2.55 | 0.01 | 3.36 | 0.005 |
Characters of VIR genetic collection lines.
| Line | Pedigree | Genes | Seeds Color | Characters |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gc-2 | l-1 from k-48, Altgauzen breeding, Russia | red-brown | wild type, earliness, high iodine number of oil | |
| gc-65 | l-3 from k-3178, local Russia, Tver region |
| speckled | orange anthers, earliness |
| gc-432 | l-5 from k-4043, Deep Pink, The Netherlands |
| black | pink petals, earliness |
| gc-109 | l-3-2 from k-6099, Macovi M.A.G., Argentina |
| red-brown | white petals, early flowering |
| gc-119 | l-2-3 from k-6210, NP (RR) 38, India |
| red-brown | light blue petals, orange anthers, a lot of |
| gc-121 | l-1-1 from k-6272, L.Dominion, N. Ireland |
| light-yellow-brown | Violet petals, high yield |
| gc-124 | l-1 from k-6284, Stormont Motley, N. Ireland |
| spotted | earliness, dilution of anthocyanin pigmentation in all plant |
| gc-129 | l-2 from k-6392, Bolley Golden, USA |
| yellow | pink petals, high iodine number of oil |
| gc-132 | l-1 from k-6608, Currong, Australia |
| red-brown | no anthocyanins in hypocotyl and flower, white deformated petals, rust resistance, a lot of arabinoxilans in mucilage |
| gc-136 | l-1 from k-6634, Mermilloid, Czech |
| yellow | no anthocyanins in plant, white deformated petals, a lot of |
| gc-141 | l-1 from k-6815, K-6, Russia |
| dark yellow-brown | pink petals |
| gc-159 | l-1-1 from k-7659, Bionda, Germany |
| yellow | a lot of arabinoxilans in mucilage, low amount of pectins and |
| gc-173 | l-1 from i-548145, 48254, Ottawa 2152, Germany |
| dark-yellow | violet petals, a lot of |
| l-1 |
| red-brown | light blue petals, yellow-green color of the plant, a lot of arabinoxilans in mucilage | |
| gc-391 | l-1-2 from i-601679, Eyre, Australia |
| yellow | no anthocyanins in the plant, white deformated petals, low content of |
| gc-473 | l-1 from i-606307, B-200, Lithuania | red-brown | yellow-green color of the plant |