| Literature DB >> 35336618 |
Dina A Refaay1, Mohammed I Abdel-Hamid1, Amal A Alyamani2, Mamdouh Abdel Mougib3, Dalia M Ahmed4, Amr Negm3,5, Amr M Mowafy1,6, Amira A Ibrahim7, Rania M Mahmoud8.
Abstract
Cyanobacteria comprise a good natural resource of a potential variety of neuro-chemicals, including acetylcholinesterase inhibitors essential for Alzheimer's disease treatment. Accordingly, eight different cyanobacterial species were isolated, identified, and evaluated on their growth on different standard nutrient media. It was found that the modified Navicula medium supported the highest growth of the test cyanobacteria. The effects of methylene chloride/methanol crude extracts of the test cyanobacteria on acetylcholinesterase activity were examined and compared. Anabaena variabilis (KU696637.1) crude extract recorded the highest acetylcholinesterase inhibition (62 ± 1.3%). Navicula medium chemical components were optimized through a Plackett-Burman factorial design. The biomass of Anabaena variabilis increased significantly when grown on the optimized medium compared to that of control. The chemical analysis of the fractions derived from Anabaena variabilis showed the presence of two compounds in significant amounts: the flavonoid 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-4H-chrome-4-one and the alkaloid 4-phenyl-2-(pyridin-3-yl) quinazoline. Molecular docking studies revealed that both compounds interact with the allosteric binding site of acetylcholinesterase at the periphery with π-π stackings with Tyr341 and Trp286 with good, predicted partition coefficient. The compounds obtained from this study open the door for promising drug candidates to treat Alzheimer's disease for their better pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic properties.Entities:
Keywords: 4-phenyl-2-(pyridin-3-yl) quinazoline; 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-4H-chromen-4-one; Anabaena variabilis; Plackett–Burman; acetylcholinesterase
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336618 PMCID: PMC8948897 DOI: 10.3390/plants11060735
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Variables investigated of the modified Navicula medium via Plackett–Burman design for Anabaena variabilis.
| No | Factors | Variables | Zero Level (0) | Low Level (−) | High Level (+) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | X1 | Ca(NO3)2·4H2O | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| 2 | X2 | K2HPO4·3H2O | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.21 |
| 3 | X3 | MgSO4·7H2O | 0.025 | 0.0125 | 0.0375 |
| 4 | X4 | Na2SiO3·9H2O | 0.1 | 0.05 | 0.15 |
| 5 | X5 | Na2CO3 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.03 |
| 6 | X6 | H3BO3 | 0.0028 | 0.0014 | 0.0042 |
| 7 | X7 | MnCl2·4H2O | 0.0009 | 0.00045 | 0.00135 |
| 8 | X8 | CuSO4·5H2O | 0.0008 | 0.0004 | 0.0012 |
| 9 | X9 | HMoO4 | 0.0009 | 0.00045 | 0.00135 |
| 10 | X10 | ZnCl2 | 0.00013 | 0.00006 | 0.00019 |
| 11 | X11 | CoCl2·6H2O | 0.00004 | 0.00002 | 0.00006 |
| 12 | X12 | FeCl3·6H2O | 0.005 | 0.0025 | 0.0075 |
| 13 | X13 | Na·EDTA·2H2O | 0.03 | 0.015 | 0.045 |
| 14 | X14 | Dummy | - |
Figure 1Average freeze-dry weight (mean of three replicates ± SD) of different species of cyanobacteria grown on different nutrient media.
AChE inhibition % in the presence of tested cyanobacteria crude extracts.
| Cyanobacteria Isolates | % Inhibition | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| 25 ± 0.87 | Inhibitory | |
|
| -- * | Stimulatory |
| -- * | Stimulatory | |
|
| -- * | Stimulatory |
|
| -- * | Stimulatory |
|
| 62 ± 1.3 | Inhibitory |
|
| -- * | Stimulatory |
|
| 49 ± 1.5 | Inhibitory |
| -- * | Stimulatory | |
| -- * | Stimulatory | |
| Donepezil | 100 ± 0.0 |
* These crude extracts increase the activity of AChE (stimulatory).
Statistical analysis of the results of Plackett–Burman experiment of each variable.
| Variable | Effect | Coefficient | T-Value | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 (Ca(NO3)2·4H2O) | −0.4305 | −0.215 | −1.45 | 0.28 | NS |
| X2 (K2HPO4·3H2O) | −0.0251 | −0.0126 | −0.07 | 0.94 | NS |
| X3 (MgSO4·7H2O) | 0.126 | 0.063 | 0.35 | 0.742 | NS |
| X4 (Na2SiO3·9H2O) | 0.155 | 0.077 | 0.43 | 0.68 | NS |
| X5 (Na2CO3) | 0.236 | 0.118 | 0.65 | 0.54 | NS |
| X6 (H3BO3) | 0.122 | 0.061 | 0.34 | 0.74 | NS |
| X7 (MnCl2·4H2O) | 0.472 | 0.236 | 1.59 | 0.135 | NS |
| X8 (CuSO4·5H2O) | 0.831 | 0.415 | 2.8 | 0.014 | S |
| X9 (HMoO4) | 0.337 | 0.168 | 0.93 | 0.39 | NS |
| X10 (ZnCl2) | −0.568 | −0.284 | −1.91 | 0.076 | S |
| X11 (CoCl2·6H2O) | 0.2449 | 0.122 | 0.68 | 0.52 | NS |
| X12 (FeCl3·6H2O) | 0.7227 | 0.361 | 2.43 | 0.029 | S |
| X13 (Na·EDTA·2H2O) | −0.383 | −0.194 | −1.06 | 0.33 | NS |
NS = non-significant at p < 0.1 and S = significant at p < 0.1.
Figure 2Average freeze-dry weight of Anabaena variabilis grown in control and verified (optimized) Navicula medium.
Figure 3The phylogenetic tree was constructed via the bootstrap test of maximum-likelihood (ML) algorithm based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence of A. variabilis (highlighted in yellow).
The chemical constituents of different fractions of A. variabilis extract and their corresponding effect on AChE activity.
| Fractions | Components | % Inhibition |
|---|---|---|
| F1 | Saturated fatty acids | - |
| F2 | Saturated fatty acids | - |
| F3 | Saturated fatty acids | - |
| F4 | Saturated fatty acids | - |
| F5 | Saturated fatty acids | - |
| F6 | Saturated fatty acids | 32.8 |
| F7 | Aromatic compounds, saturated and unsaturated fatty acids | 73.6 |
| F8 | Aromatic compounds, saturated and unsaturated fatty acids | 50 |
| F9 | Fatty materials | 8 |
| F10 | Fatty materials | 45.2 |
| Donepezeil | - | 100 ± 0.0 |
Figure 4The chemical nature of some of the identified compounds in F7 (a) 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-4H-chrome-4-one and (b) 4-phenyl-2-(pyridin-3-yl) quinazoline compounds.
Figure 5Alignments of DHI (green), donepezil (grey), 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-4H-chromen-4-one (pink) and 4-phenyl-2-(pyridin-3 yl)quinazoline (orange) in the active site of AChE (Left: face view, Right: side view).
Figure 6The 3D binding mode of DHI (a), 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-4H-chrome-4-one (b) and 4-phenyl-2-(pyridin-3-yl)quinazoline (c) showing π-π interactions as orange lines and hydrogen bonds as green dotted lines with the interacting amino acids (the rest of the binding site amino acids are hidden for simplification).
Binding energies of the selected poses of DHI and test molecules.
| Compound | CDOCKER Interaction Energy | CDOCKER Energy | Scoring Function | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LigScore1 | LigScore2 | PLP1 | PLP2 | Jain | |||
| Donepezil | 45.18 | 7.24 | 2.68 | 5.52 | 86.14 | 84.95 | 3.81 |
| DHI | 38.92 | 1.30 | 3.28 | 5.54 | 99.96 | 91.50 | 4.27 |
| A | 35.28 | 30.23 | 4.17 | 5.57 | 79.80 | 85.20 | 2.52 |
| B | 32.65 | 5.64 | 1.76 | 5.20 | 76.97 | 68.99 | 0.37 |
ADMET prediction descriptors calculated by Discovery Studio 2.5.
| ADMET Tests | ADMET Level | Donepezil | A | B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A log P 98 | <5 (good) | 4.12 | 2.652 | 5.301 |
| PSA | <140 Å (good) | 38.77 | 67.861 | 33.783 |
| Absorption | 0 (good) | 0 | 0 | |
| BBB | 0.9 (very good) | 0.9953 | 0.408 | 0.95 |
| Solubility | 1 (poor) | −3.259 | −6.895 | |
| Hepatotoxicity | 1 (toxic) | 0.933 | 0.933 | |
| CYP2D6 | 1 (inhibitor) | 0.8684 | 0.772 | 0.801 |
| PPB level | 2 (binding ≥ 95%) | 96% | 2 | 2 |