| Literature DB >> 35336276 |
Ali Hassan Sodhro1,2, Charlotte Sennersten1, Awais Ahmad3.
Abstract
Secure and reliable sensing plays the key role for cognitive tracking i.e., activity identification and cognitive monitoring of every individual. Over the last years there has been an increasing interest from both academia and industry in cognitive authentication also known as biometric recognition. These are an effect of individuals' biological and physiological traits. Among various traditional biometric and physiological features, we include cognitive/brainwaves via electroencephalogram (EEG) which function as a unique performance indicator due to its reliable, flexible, and unique trait resulting in why it is hard for an un-authorized entity(ies) to breach the boundaries by stealing or mimicking them. Conventional security and privacy techniques in the medical domain are not the potential candidates to simultaneously provide both security and energy efficiency. Therefore, state-of-the art biometrics methods (i.e., machine learning, deep learning, etc.) their applications with novel solutions are investigated and recommended. The experimental setup considers EEG data analysis and interpretation of BCI. The key purpose of this setup is to reduce the number of electrodes and hence the computational power of the Random Forest (RF) classifier while testing EEG data. The performance of the random forest classifier was based on EEG datasets for 20 subjects. We found that the total number of occurred events revealed 96.1% precision in terms of chosen events.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; IoT; biometrics; cognitive authentication; healthcare; sensing
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336276 PMCID: PMC8949031 DOI: 10.3390/s22062101
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Related Works.
| Ref. No. | Applications | Proposed Solution | Merits | Demerits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | EEG, ECG, Secure BSN for medical care | Security and privacy | Energy efficient | Complex and inefficient |
| [ | Smart, secure, and private media and bio-signal based Healthcare, IoT, physiological signals | Secure power control | Duty-cycle, data rate | High energy and battery drain during media transmission |
| [ | Vital sign signals, security in cloud healthcare, EEG, ECG, medical IoT | Cloud and battery enabled | Fairy and battery efficient | Less power-aware and secure |
| [ | WSNs, Secure and energy-aware IoT and BSN, EEG, vital sign signals | Frameworks and protocols | Extensive survey for healthcare | Not focused on mobile healthcare |
| [ | Medical IoT, EEG, Data integrity and security in healthcare | Energy-aware and routing protocols | Energy optimization and efficient routing | Complex and less battery-efficient |
| [ | EEG, Privacy in medical industrial applications, smart healthcare | Energy harvesting and duty-cycle enabled | Battery and energy-aware | Inappropriate for medical healthcare |
| [ | EEG, medical IoT, Security and privacy in Telemedicine and BAN | QoS optimization based | Efficient QoS management | Less Battery and energy -efficient for healthcare |
| [ | EEG, ECG, SpO2, smart and Secure healthcare, efficient Cellular networks | TPC and relay selection based | Novel Architecture and resource allocation method | High battery and energy drain in medical healthcare system |
| [ | Private and secure communication systems | TPC and resource allocation | Energy optimization in wireless and sensor networks | Complex and less reliable for dynamic healthcare |
| [ | ECG based secure BSN, Telemedicine, remote healthcare | Energy and battery-based frameworks and method | Efficient resource allocation | Complex and less battery-aware for medical services |
| [ | Resource allocation in smart medical networks, EEG | TPC and radio-aware | Intelligent resource monitoring in radio networks | Unsuitable for healthcare system |
| [ | Efficient and secure Future Networks, EEG, vital sign signals | QoS and Energy Scavenging | Novel energy and QoS efficient | Complex and less reliable for healthcare system |
| [ | ECG, EEG, physiological signals, smart healthcare, IoT, lifecycle | TPC and QoS-aware framework | Detailed survey | Not focus at joint duty-cycle and TPC |
| [ | Secure and cryptographic IoT for healthcare | Energy and battery-oriented | Novel Physical layer and framework for healthcare | Complex, less reliable without duty cycle |
| [ | Green, battery-aware healthcare, BSN, medical IoT, ECG, EEG | Fuzzy based secure | Secure home monitoring | High energy drain |
| [ | EEG, ECG, secure and pervasive WSN | TPC and battery-based | Efficient media transmission | More battery drain |
| [ | Smart healthcare, Biometric based IoT, vital sign signals | Framework and battery-aware | Efficient lifecycle management | Less energy saving |
| [ | EEG, medical IoT, Secure Telemedicine and CPS | Optimal resource allocation | QoS monitoring and management | More energy and battery drain |
| [ | EEG, healthcare, Ubiquitous secure and digital based | TPC based and framework | Novel ECG monitoring algorithm and framework | More battery drain |
| [ | Smart and Green systems, EEG, Security | Routing protocols and framework | Routing and battery-based | More energy dissipation |
| [ | Smart healthcare, Cryptography and privacy | TPC-aware | Novel Framework and method | High battery drain |
| [ | BCI, EEG datasets | EDF tool for data | Performance metrics | RF classifier |
Experimental analysis of EEG data by using Random Forest classifier.
| Subject | Accuracy | TP Rate | Precision | AUC |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 86.01% | 0.86 | 0.902 | 0.956 |
| S2 | 67.3% | 0.670 | 0.654 | 0.836 |
| S3 | 90.01% | 0.90 | 0.951 | 0.956 |
| S4 | 96.11% | 0.961 | 0.961 | 0.987 |
| S5 | 64.41% | 0.644 | 0.65 | 0.713 |
| S6 | 62.34% | 0.623 | 0.624 | 0.81 |
| S7 | 60.12% | 0.601 | 0.62 | 0.713 |
| S8 | 89.37% | 0.894 | 0.892 | 0.951 |
| S9 | 84.11% | 0.841 | 0.80 | 0.930 |
| S10 | 99.43% | 0.994 | 0.965 | 1 |
| S11 | 95.73% | 0.96 | 0.965 | 0.988 |
| S12 | 88.41% | 0.884 | 0.815 | 0.875 |
| S13 | 60.17% | 0.602 | 0.601 | 0.80 |
| S14 | 61.38% | 0.614 | 0.602 | 0.780 |
| S15 | 59.44% | 0.594 | 0.673 | 0.804 |
| S16 | 95.31% | 0.953 | 0.954 | 0.985 |
| S17 | 89.43% | 0.894 | 0.910 | 0.976 |
| S18 | 90.37% | 0.904 | 0.900 | 0.968 |
| S19 | 61.42% | 0.614 | 0.601 | 0.801 |
| S20 | 98.31% | 0.983 | 0.983 | 0.976 |
Figure 1Proposed Cognitive Authentication Framework for smart Healthcare Applications.
Figure 2Energy Efficiency during compressive sensing in IoT devices.
Figure 3Battery Lifetime and Authentication level of IoT devices.
Figure 4Reliability of IoT devices in terms of RSSI.