Literature DB >> 32276061

Comparing MEG and EEG in detecting the ~20-Hz rhythm modulation to tactile and proprioceptive stimulation.

Mia Illman1, Kristina Laaksonen2, Mia Liljeström3, Veikko Jousmäki4, Harri Piitulainen5, Nina Forss6.   

Abstract

Modulation of the ~20-Hz brain rhythm has been used to evaluate the functional state of the sensorimotor cortex both in healthy subjects and patients, such as stroke patients. The ~20-Hz brain rhythm can be detected by both magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG), but the comparability of these methods has not been evaluated. Here, we compare these two methods in the evaluating of ~20-Hz activity modulation to somatosensory stimuli. Rhythmic ~20-Hz activity during separate tactile and proprioceptive stimulation of the right and left index finger was recorded simultaneously with MEG and EEG in twenty-four healthy participants. Both tactile and proprioceptive stimulus produced a clear suppression at 300-350 ​ms followed by a subsequent rebound at 700-900 ​ms after stimulus onset, detected at similar latencies both with MEG and EEG. The relative amplitudes of suppression and rebound correlated strongly between MEG and EEG recordings. However, the relative strength of suppression and rebound in the contralateral hemisphere (with respect to the stimulated hand) was significantly stronger in MEG than in EEG recordings. Our results indicate that MEG recordings produced signals with higher signal-to-noise ratio than EEG, favoring MEG as an optimal tool for studies evaluating sensorimotor cortical functions. However, the strong correlation between MEG and EEG results encourages the use of EEG when translating studies to clinical practice. The clear advantage of EEG is the availability of the method in hospitals and bed-side measurements at the acute phase.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beta rebound; Beta rhythm; Beta suppression; Passive movement; Sensorimotor cortex; Tactile stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32276061     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  5 in total

1.  Altruistic acting caused by a touching hand: neural underpinnings of the Midas touch effect.

Authors:  Michael Schaefer; Anja Kühnel; Franziska Rumpel; Matti Gärtner
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 4.235

2.  Reliability of Upper Limb Pin-Prick Stimulation With Electroencephalography: Evoked Potentials, Spectra and Source Localization.

Authors:  Lisa Tedesco Triccas; Kenneth P Camilleri; Camilleri Tracey; Fahimi Hnazaee Mansoureh; Wittevrongel Benjamin; Muscat Francesca; Boccuni Leonardo; Mantini Dante; Verheyden Geert
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 3.473

3.  Reproducibility of Rolandic beta rhythm modulation in MEG and EEG.

Authors:  Mia Illman; Kristina Laaksonen; Veikko Jousmäki; Nina Forss; Harri Piitulainen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Towards Cognitive Authentication for Smart Healthcare Applications.

Authors:  Ali Hassan Sodhro; Charlotte Sennersten; Awais Ahmad
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  The effect of alertness and attention on the modulation of the beta rhythm to tactile stimulation.

Authors:  Mia Illman; Kristina Laaksonen; Mia Liljeström; Harri Piitulainen; Nina Forss
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-06
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.