| Literature DB >> 35336150 |
Ge Gao1, Yan Zhang1, Shaofang Niu1, Yu Chen1, Shaojing Wang1, Nusratgul Anwar1, Shuai Chen1, Guoqiang Li1,2, Ting Ma1,2.
Abstract
Precise classification of bacteria facilitates prediction of their ecological niche. The genus Enterobacter includes pathogens of plants and animals but also beneficial bacteria that may require reclassification. Here, we propose reclassification of Enterobacter FY-07 (FY-07), a strain that has many plant-growth-promoting traits and produces bacterial cellulose (BC), to the Kosakonia genera. To re-examine the taxonomic position of FY-07, a polyphasic approach including 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, ATP synthase β subunit (atpD) gene sequence analysis, DNA gyrase (gyrB) gene sequence analysis, initiation translation factor 2 (infB) gene sequence analysis, RNA polymerase β subunit (rpoB) gene sequence analysis, determination of DNA G + C content, average nucleotide identity based on BLAST, in silico DNA-DNA hybridization and analysis of phenotypic features was applied. This polyphasic analysis suggested that Enterobacter sp. FY-07 should be reclassified as Kosakonia oryzendophytica FY-07. In addition, the potential of FY-07 to promote plant growth was also investigated by detecting related traits and the colonization of FY-07 in rice roots.Entities:
Keywords: Enterobacter; FY-07; Kosakonia; promote plant growth; reclassification
Year: 2022 PMID: 35336150 PMCID: PMC8951479 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10030575
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Neighbor-joining tree showing the 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic relationships of strain FY-07 and phylogenetically related reference strains. Bootstrap values based on 1000 resampling tests are shown at branch nodes. Bar, 1% substitution rate per site.
Pairwise comparisons of isDDH and ANI values of FY-07 and type strains of the genus Kosakonia.
| 96.10 | 26.50 | 26.40 | 26.40 | 26.10 | 26.50 | 25.60 | 25.30 | ||
| 99.45 | 26.20 | 26.30 | 26.20 | 26.10 | 26.20 | 25.60 | 25.30 | ||
| 84.13 | 84.21 | 59.10 | 28.00 | 50.90 | 27.80 | 26.70 | 26.60 | ||
| 84.07 | 84.08 | 94.94 | 27.80 | 48.60 | 27.70 | 27.00 | 26.50 | ||
| 83.89 | 83.89 | 84.95 | 84.74 | 27.40 | 66.40 | 53.10 | 51.30 | ||
| 83.83 | 83.90 | 93.29 | 92.71 | 84.45 | 27.40 | 26.60 | 26.40 | ||
| 83.78 | 83.78 | 84.66 | 84.52 | 95.85 | 84.36 | 54.30 | 52.40 | ||
| 83.08 | 83.15 | 83.99 | 84.13 | 92.92 | 83.80 | 93.04 | 54.80 | ||
| 82.78 | 82.99 | 83.86 | 83.80 | 92.62 | 83.69 | 92.80 | 93.36 | ||
| 82.37 | 82.48 | 83.66 | 83.71 | 83.17 | 83.27 | 82.98 | 82.39 | 82.10 |
The upper triangle (blue portion) displays isDDH values (%), and the lower triangle (yellow portion) displays ANI values (%). Boxes with isDDH ≥ 70% or ANI ≥ 95% are colored red.
Figure 2Genomic synteny shared between Kosakonia sacchari LMG 26783T (a), FY-07 (b), Kosakonia quasisacchari WCHEs120001T (c), Kosakonia oryzendophytica LMG 26432T (d) and Kosakonia oryzae LMG 24251T (e).
Phenotypic features of strain FY-07 and strain types of Kosakonia species [4,5,6,7]: 1, FY-07; 2, Kosakonia oryzendophytica; 3, Kosakonia sacchari; 4, Kosakonia pseudosacchari; 5, Kosakonia oryzae; 6, Kosakonia quasisacchari; 7, Kosakonia radicincitans; 8, Kosakonia oryziphila; 9, Kosakonia arachidis; 10, Kosakonia cowanii. +, positive; −, negative.
| Characteristic | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-Galactosidase | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Arginine dihydrolase | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Lysine decarboxylase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Ornithine decarboxylase | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | + | − |
| Citrate utilization | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| H2S production | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Urea hydrolysis | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Indole production | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| Voges-Proskauer reaction | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Gelatinase | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | − |
| d-Glucose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| d-Mannitol | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Inositol | − | + | − | − | − | − | − | + | + | − |
| d-Sorbitol | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Sucrose | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Melibiose | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | − | − | + |
Genes of FY-07 involved in plant growth-promotion.
| Traits | Genes |
|---|---|
| Nitrogen fixation and metabolism | |
| Phosphate solubilization | |
| Plant hormone synthesis | |
| Siderophore production | |
| ACC deaminase production |
|
| Betaine production | |
| Acetoin and butanodiol sythesis |
Figure 3Identification of plant growth promoting traits of FY-07. (a), colony morphology of FY-07 on DF salt minimal medium without ACC added; (b), colony morphology of FY-07 on DF medium with ACC; (c), colony morphology of FY-07 on Modified CAS Agar Medium; (d), comparison of colony morphology between Escherichia coli MG1655 (left) and FY-07 (right) on Jensen’s medium; (e), colony morphology of FY-07 on Pikovskaya medium.
Figure 4Number and morphology of colonies from rice roots with (a) and without (b) FY-07 treatment grown on LB plates with (right) and without (left) kanamycin.